Tell them you want to know
more about standardized tests and what educational purposes they have.
Not exact matches
Champions and Dissidents express very different opinions
about standardized testing.Dissidents are much
more likely to say the amount of time spent on
testing is «too high» (61 percent) compared with Champions (19 percent).
CASEL reports: «A landmark review found that students who receive SEL instruction had
more positive attitudes
about school and improved an average of 11 percentile points on
standardized achievement
tests compared to students who did not receive such instruction.»
«A lot of the current interest among researchers in the policymaking community, and among practitioners, is centered on an attempt to be
more specific
about what it is that is not directly captured by
standardized tests yet contributes to students» success.
In education we talk
about the necessity for the U.S. to become Internationally competitive, but many have the false assumption that
standardized tests are somehow going to help make us
more competitive.
But
testing opposition appears to be
more closely linked to concerns
about teacher evaluation policies: the top two reasons chosen among a national survey of parents who opted out were, «I oppose using students» performance on
standardized tests to evaluate teachers» and «
standardized tests force teachers to teach to the
test.»
Overall, she and Weinstein both say that
more research is needed to draw specific conclusions
about the impact of digital media — and
standardized testing — on creativity and the willingness by students to take risks and break away from the standard mold.
Browse the resources below for
more information
about standardized tests, including new
tests aligned to the Common Core State Standards.
For the families we serve, whose children are
more apt to attend low - performing schools and have less - effective teachers than their privileged peers, the time taken for
standardized tests is a reasonable cost for receiving vital information
about how their children are doing academically.
This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression, improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.), improved attitudes
about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and
more positive attitudes
about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and improved academic performance (e.g.
standardized achievement
test scores).
According to the survey, parent opinion reads like a photocopy of the union's agenda — supportive of
more investment in schools and teachers, wary of
standardized testing, skeptical
about evaluating teachers based on student performance, and resistant to the expansion of choice.
As someone responsible for students with learning disabilities and for closing the achievement gap, and as a school instructional leader, working toward eliminating
standardized tests such as AP's and assessing department based learning outcomes, I am eager to learn
more about three aspects of Finnish education:
It encourages colleges to revise their applications to ask students
about two or three extracurricular activities, rather to encourage them to submit long lists of sports and clubs they participate in and to consider make
standardized tests optional or discouraging students from taking them
more than twice.
Knowing that Finland does not use
standardized testing, I am curious to learn
more about how Finnish teachers build and connect assessments to their curriculums.
Proficiency rates on
standardized tests, as NCLB showed, often revealed
more about the makeup of a school's student body than what the school was doing to improve their education.
Sadly, results from
standardized test most often tell us
more about the family and community economics in which a student lives than how much a student knows or can do.
At one of the most socially difficult times of their lives, over a third of our children have
more anxiety
about standardized tests than any other issue.
State accountability systems focus attention and resources on low performance and remediation, but in many school districts across the country district leaders are as much concerned, if not
more,
about sustaining good performance and
about establishing agendas for student learning beyond proficiency scores on
standardized tests.
When you are being abused or hearing
about children and parents being abused and harassed for opting out of the unfair and discriminatory Common Core SBAC
test or when you are paying
more in taxes and watching important school programs and services cut, now that thanks to our elected and appointed officials we are pissing away $ 100,000,000.00 a year forcing children to take a
test that will tell us that students from rich families tend to do better and student from poor families tend to do worse on
standardized tests.
Learn
more about legal information on
standardized tests, high - stakes
testing, and academic honors.
Jon, AF pays its teachers
about 10 %
more than their host district pays its teachers on average, spends slightly less total $ $ on a per pupil basis, and academically outperforms its host districts by wide margins in terms of
standardized tests in reading, writing, and math, graduation rates, and college entrance.
Standardized tests, benchmark assessments (often designed to see how students are progressing towards achievement on a standardized test), and end - of - course assessments are more about evaluating teaching and
Standardized tests, benchmark assessments (often designed to see how students are progressing towards achievement on a
standardized test), and end - of - course assessments are more about evaluating teaching and
standardized test), and end - of - course assessments are
more about evaluating teaching and instruction.
Making judgments
about student learning and school quality based on a body of work — a select number of pieces of student work from a number of assessments within a given discipline, provides a much richer and
more accurate picture of student learning than a single, disconnected
standardized test.
Finally,
standardized test scores are strongly correlated with students» demographic characteristics, which means they tend to tell us
more about the number of economically advantaged students in any particular school than what they are learning.
Asked
about the «increased focus on
standardized testing and data in public schools over the past decade,» 33 percent feels that it has «had little effect,» while 36 percent believes it has «actually done
more harm than good.»
Sample STAR
TEST QUESTIONS — Learn
more about the California
Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) program and view real questions released from actual
tests.
Our instructors believe education is
about more than memorizing information and performing well on
standardized tests.
President Obama has now succumbed to the firestorm in opposition to
standardized and «high stakes»
testing that has swept the country over the past several years, even picking up on the talking points — «Learning is
about so much
more than just filling in the right bubble».
Take a peek below to read a little
more about this reading skill and how you can find it in those long reading passages on
standardized tests.
Because classroom teachers can effectively use all available assessment methods, including the
more labor - intensive methods of performance assessment and personal communication, they can provide information
about student progress not typically available from student information systems or
standardized test results.
Hidden behind the debate
about turnaround programs, charter schools,
standardized testing, evaluation methods and the common core curriculum rages a far
more fundamental argument; what do we actually expect our public education to achieve... What is the purpose of public education?
These measures tell me way
more about my students academic growth and development than
standardized tests do.
But the teachers expressed concern
about how their principals could handle
more time in classrooms and that
standardized tests would be overused.
Please visit the
standardized testing page of the CPA website for
more information
about which students will take which
tests, and review the school calendar to see when each class will be
testing.
As
more and
more parents choose to opt their children out of
standardized tests, some educators and teachers» union representatives have been speculating
about how all those missing scores might impact teacher - evaluation outcomes that are based on
test results.
For those who are interested in knowing
more about why parents despise AzMERIT and
standardized testing, keep reading.
Counselors advise students and parents
about standardized testing, college essays and applications, financial aid options, and
more.
More specific to VAMs, I wrote
about how ESSA will allow states to decide how to weight their
standardized test scores and decide whether and how to evaluate teachers with or without said scores.
For example, the Associated Press recently wrote
about the
standardized testing situation in New Jersey where Governor Christi, like Governor Malloy, is a big fan of having
more standardized testing.
«People are happy
about that because it means students won't have to take
more standardized tests, and it opens doors for students who thought they'd never be college bound because they wouldn't be able to pass the SAT.
A landmark review found that students who receive SEL instruction had
more positive attitudes
about school and improved an average of 11 percentile points on
standardized achievement
tests compared to students who did not receive such instruction.
Although value - added is one of the
more advanced statistical approaches, researchers have raised concerns
about its reliability, as well as potential unintended consequences, such as demoralizing teachers and placing greater emphasis on
standardized tests.
And many of us simultaneously asserted that
standardized testing, and the MAP
test in particular, is a clumsy form of assessment that often hides
more than it reveals
about student knowledge — particularly the thought process and how a student arrived at particular answer.
To answer the original question posed by faculty members
about why
standardized testing is necessary for our students, Finland's history tells a story of
more than the elimination of
standardized tests.
Second, Flowers clearly does not know much
about current
standardized tests in that they are all constructed under contract with the same
testing companies, they all include the same types of items, they all measure (
more or less) the same set of standards... they all undergo the same sets of bias, discrimination, etc. analyses, and the like.
Written by Carrie Wilson, Executive Director (
more about Carrie) After
more than a decade of placing far too much emphasis on
standardized test results, there is (finally) growing acknowledgement that
standardized tests can not be...
It's generally true that schools consider a wide range of factors in admission, and
standardized -
test scores become
more important if they are very low or if schools have other reservations or considerations
about the student.
Visit a college planning site to learn
more about searching for schools, finding the right college for you and tips for
standardized test preparation.
I've previously posted
about studies that have found that the laser - like focus on raising student
test scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see More Evidence Showing The Dangers Of Using High - Stakes Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose Students Achieve High Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Upda
test scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see
More Evidence Showing The Dangers Of Using High - Stakes
Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of
Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose Students Achieve High
Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Upda
Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Update).
This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression, improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.), improved attitudes
about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and
more positive attitudes
about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and improved academic performance (e.g.
standardized achievement
test scores).