Not exact matches
It is also a form of control and censor to stop character assassination, vulgarity,
ad hominem arguments, and much
more.
And I don't necessarily disagree, I'm just saying that @jc's point would be
more arguable, perhaps, as a weak analogy fallacy rather that the
ad hominem s / he chose, since the crux of the
argument is the comparison, not the person making the
argument.
Hepcat, Your incessant insults show that you subscribe to
ad hominem argument,
more evidence of weak critical thinking skills.
I know that you called my
argument stupid but you never gave a compelling reason why (which isn't
ad hominem, by the way since you were targeting a
argument and not a person, do read
more about informal fallacies to avoid seeming uneducated).
I am accused of
argument ad hominem, but it seems to me the
argument ad hominem is directed far
more at me.
They misrepresent evidence, engage in
ad hominem attacks and other fallacious
arguments, they continually premise shift, when challenged they change the subject, they use obfuscation and
argument by assertion; they are funded by people with a vested interest in a particular conclusion; and
more.