Sentences with phrase «more aggressive man»

Kolasinac, I feel is the same problem as Xhaka — nothing to do with the system, it's just that some players need more aggressive man - management, and these 2 are perfect examples of players who would be better under Ferguson or even Mourinho.

Not exact matches

In particular, men were more aggressive when they negotiated with counterparts they knew... were female, using hardball tactics more often.

Men got way more aggressive.

The Seki Edge AS - D2 is also notable for delivering a very mild shave — great for those with sensitive skin — although admittedly, men who need a more aggressive razor might be underwhelmed with its performance.

However, women are still promoted less than men, and those that do negotiate are 67 percent more likely, than men or than women who don't negotiate, to have their personal style described in reviews as «bossy» or «too aggressive.»

According to the study, women who negotiate are more likely than men who negotiate to receive feedback that they are «intimidating,» «too aggressive,» or «bossy».

This is the stealthy cultural buildup that might cause you to recoil when a woman is aggressive but find the same behavior charming in a man, for example, even though few people these days would consciously agree with a statement like «women should be more submissive.»

But we looked at the behaviors of people making pitches, and categorized them based on the stereotypes around masculinity and femininity — men are assumed to be more confident, aggressive and bold, and women are supposed to be more expressive.

I worried that the people I saw in managing roles (all men, by the way) had a very different leadership style than I did — more aggressive, less collaborative.

While the 41 is recommended for experienced wet shavers, some men prefer a more aggressive razor.

Men tend to be more aggressive on the whole because their aggression is rewarded as confidence by society.

Self - involved, self - righteous, and sullen, the adult Scout is a young woman trying to make sense of her relationship to the town, or more precisely, trying to make sense of what it means to remain in continuity with this world when its aggressive reaction to national events is at odds with her own, which, it has to be said, is not without some unseemly elements (as when she assures a relative that while she supports civil rights, she'd never want to marry a black man, personally).

The moment we say «women are gentle» we instantly think of men who are more so and women who are not at all; as soon as we assert «men are aggressive» contrary examples come to mind.

The story is told from the point of view of the more primitive, less aggressive, Neanderthal man.

When we are going to play a more aggressive team — one that might control a lot of possession — like a Chelsea or Man City, I think we need a defensive player who can help regain possession and start the counter.

You are spot on on Perez being better than ozil if he's given the chance, but neither of them are at wilshere's level when fit Wilshere is aggressive, you can't get the ball off him unless you foul him which gives us enough set pieces, he's a big game player, watch our games against Bayern, barca, Chelsea, man city, man utd e.t.c when he plays, he creates more chances You just need to watch his games even at Bournemouth against Chelsea, which brings me back to the point that, no coach will ever play ozil while Wilshere is fit except wenger............ Plus, ozil is a pu ** y or a weakling rather

Even though Daniel Ayala performed with distinction against the notoriously rough and tumble aggressive Stoke City attack signing the man mountain that is Greek International Sotirios Kyrgiakos makes a lot of sense both in terms of his abilities and experience but perhaps more importantly in terms of price.

His head securty dude looked like John Malcovichs Cryrus character from Con - Air, except with a more aggressive constant alert look that tells me hes definitely killed a man in a legally sanctioned war.

Liverpools just stuck on their back foot so far because Man City is being much more aggressive than they were in the first leg.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Common denominator: coach with a plan (strategy, tactics, player rotation), well drilled players playing in natural positions, more hands - on / aggressive man management..

These moves are all part of the club's move to adopt a more aggressive transfer policy, one which the Daily Telegraph states will see Man United ready, willing and able to sign a «Luis Suarez a year».

With this mentality, we should forget about the title, because it will only rotate between Chelsea, City and Man U, who are more aggressive and ambitious to win it.

never call gabriel stupid, he did wht a good player supposed to do, it will nt change anything, I have never watch an arsenal match officiated by mike dean which we win it, mike dean hate arsenal, so we hate him, both the referee, the sidelines men should be punished accordingly, english fans shld also be more serious and aggressive

However, when you note Navas has attempted just one shot and one dribble over three matches, it becomes apparent that the former Sevilla man should be more aggressive if he wants to take his game to even greater heights.

The use of a back three in the second half allowed Spurs to be more aggressive with ten men.

We shall see if Antonio Conte pushes his men to get more aggressive and attack more in the away leg on March 14.

Alternatively, England could opt for a more aggressive approach with a three - man midfield.

With more women on campuses than men, women have had to be a lot more aggressive — and easier to bed — to attract a guy's attention.

Men with less testosterone are likely to be less aggressive and more caring.

This latest plan, unveiled less than a month before the one - year mark of Eric Garner's death and one week before a video of a cop punching a Harlem man made the news, will likely seek to achieve two things: to create a larger pool of informants, and to utilize public complaints to argue that Bratton's Broken Windows theory — the aggressive policing of low - level offenses to deter more serious crime — is what New Yorkers still want.

When a National Institutes of Health award emphasized «aggressive risk taking» among its criteria, all nine of the first winners were men; later, terms such as «pioneering» and «high impact» attracted and rewarded more women.

Beyond that, «men are more aggressive about getting networks together,» she says, which provides an important leg up for aspiring entrepreneurs.

«Markers for prostate cancer death can identify men in need of more aggressive treatment.»

«Contrary to expectations, the more aggressive, combined treatment did not result in superior cancer control rates at five years follow - up, indicating that men can achieve a similar survival benefit with fewer late side effects through brachytherapy alone.»

At five years following RT, survival rates for men who received brachytherapy alone were comparable to those who underwent more aggressive radiation treatment.

Depressed men with localized prostate cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with more aggressive prostate cancer, received less effective treatments and survived for shorter times than prostate cancer patients who were not depressed, a UCLA study has found.

These findings offer tantalizing hints that even gender behavior differences once attributed solely to nurture — women are more emotionally attuned, while men are more physically aggressive — stem in part from variations in our neural circuitry.

«This combination test is not designed to say definitively at diagnosis whether a man has aggressive prostate cancer, but it can provide a more accurate estimate of the likelihood of having cancer and the likelihood of that cancer being aggressive,» Tomlins says.

By age 80, more than 50 percent of men will develop prostate cancer but not all will have the aggressive, deadly form of the disease.

Of the 113 volunteers enrolled in the study, 41 men — or 36 percent — were found to have more aggressive cancer than initially suspected, meaning they were not good candidates for active surveillance.

UCLA researchers found that conventional «blind» biopsy failed to reveal the true extent of presumed low - risk prostate cancers, and that when targeted biopsy was used, more than a third of these men had more aggressive cancers than they thought.

«For men with prostate cancer, emotional distress may lead to more aggressive treatment.»

«Emotional distress may motivate men with low - risk prostate cancer to choose more aggressive treatment, such as choosing surgery over active surveillance,» said UB's Heather Orom, the lead author on the study, published in the February issue of the Journal of Urology.

The authors stressed that the long - term reduction in aggressive disease was observed only in men after more than a year of testosterone use, and the risk of prostate cancer did not differ between gels and other types of preparations.

Finally, the third explanation stems from the fact that research shows that men tend to be more verbally aggressive when provoked, while women tend to negotiate more.

For example, they use more often communication techniques and have a less aggressive approach to defusing violent situations compared to men in other sectors.

The classic view is that, under stress, men respond with «fight or flight,» i.e. they become aggressive or leave the scene, whereas women are more prone to «tend and befriend,» as has been shown in research by Shelley Taylor.

The researchers found that, rather than becoming more aggressive after stress, men in the stress group actually became more trusting of others, displayed more trustworthy behavior themselves, and were more likely to cooperate and share profits.

«The fact that men in 2013 who presented with metastatic disease had much higher PSAs than similar men in 2004 hints that more aggressive disease is on the rise,» Schaeffer said.