Sentences with phrase «more alarmist claims»

Ultimately the problem is that human experience of weather, particularly as one gets older (and in a position to influence the politics of this), naturally leads most people to dismiss the more alarmist claims.

Personally, I remain unconvinced by the more alarmist claims, for the simple reason that if we get desperate we can convert coal into liquid fuels (as South Africa has done for decades).

Not exact matches

Even more devastating is Connelly's demolition of the claim to moral high ground that the overpopulation alarmists made.

Alarmists have drawn some support for increased claims of tropical storminess from a casual claim by Sir John Houghton of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a warmer world would have more evaporation, with latent heat providing more energy for disturbances.

there has been 15 to 25 times more CO2 than current concentrations; the claim that this time we will reach a tipping point is alarmist, ludicrous, and totally without foundation,» declared atmospheric scientist Robert W. Endlich on July 12, 2009.

But I'm glad to teach you again, because others will see that Maxwell agrees with me, and does not deny the 2nd Law like you and your fellow climate alarmists do when you claim that the cold atmosphere transfers more thermal energy / heat to the earth's surface than the Sun does.

In spite of his rather mild (in comparison to many sceptics» claims) position, Lomborg was the subject of more vitriol from the alarmist propaganda machine than perhaps any other climate - sceptic / denier / realist figure.

«The GHG «theory» based on CO2 is a thermodynamic impossibility» Yes, the climate alarmists peddle their pseudoscience claiming that the ghe works by transferring heat / thermal energy from the cold atmosphere to the warmer surface of the earth, more heat / thermal energy than is transferred by the Sun.

Contrary to Stewart's claim that the world was united by scientific evidence in the early 1990s, even by 1995, there was still only the «suggestion», on the «balance of evidence», that there had been a «discernible human influence on global climate» — and that's in the Summary for Policymakers document, which has consistently been far more alarmist than the more technical parts of the report.

Many climate alarmists claim 97 percent or more climate scientists state carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is causing global warming.

Even alarmists think water vapor is more important given the bogus claim that water vapor enhancement is a larger influence on the surface temperature than the original effect of a CO2 increase.

Jim D If and when we have something resembling evidence that CO2 is the problem that alarmists claim it is, instead of just government - funded science / propaganda supporting the case for yet more taxes, then having those who produce CO2 would indeed make sense.

As we've seen over the last couple of years, many of the more outlandish and alarmist claims in the IPCC reports have been based not on peer - reviewed science, but on «grey literature» — the propaganda sheets and press releases distributed by fanatical green NGOs (many of which are part - funded by the European Commission — but that's another story).

(More cynically, even if we «do nothing» about the crisis de jour and nothing happens said alarmists may have the gall to claim that by «raising awareness of the problem» they still somehow managed to avert it - «and you can make the check out to...») Even worse, alarmists project out that terrible things will happen if we don't take IMMEDIATE (and highly expensive) action to avert the crisis by assuming the worst - case scenario.

By the way, that's something that seems conspicuously absent among the more rabid alarmists who claim to have got it just about all figured out.

I've always been agnostic about [climate change]... I don't completely dismiss the more dire warnings but I instinctively feel that some of the claims are exaggerated... I don't accept all of the alarmist conclusions... You can never be absolutely certain that all the science is in.

-- There is a lot of money to be made in the «green» industry — Alarmist claims brings more funding (supports many careers) and... — A lot of youth votes are to be won by politicians.

Embracing an alarmist view of the future, the President claimed CO2 - induced climate change will lead to «submerged countries,» «abandoned cities,» «fields that no longer grow,» «political disruptions» and «more floods.»

The more ridiculous these claims become, the more desperate the alarmists appear.

CLIMATE change alarmists, like Tim Flannery and the ABC, claim Australian bush fires are unprecedented and becoming more extreme, thanks to human carbon dioxide «pollution» emissions.

Canadians Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris report from Bonn that the IPCC is now resorting to even more spurious «science» than ever in support of its wildly alarmist claims of climate catastrophe around the corner.

Satellite technology was introduced to provide more objective measurement of the sea level rise because properly adjusted tide gauge data was not fitting Alarmists» claims.

More importantly, this piece shows how scientists are not «alarmists» despite the constant claim that they are.

Having once before fallen for a â $ œNorth Pole is melting!â $ scam, even the New York Times — on its blog, mind you, no need to tamp down alarmism on its print pages â $ «admitted that the hyperventilated headline and lede â $ œgo way beyond what Mark Serreze of the National Snow and Ice Data Center tells the reporter.â $ Serreze claimed on an alarmist blog that his actual claims â $ œquickly grew out of all reasonable proportion, â $ admitting that a summer loss of ice at the North Pole â $ œsummer would be purely symbolic, but symbolism can be pretty darned powerfulâ $ (prompting an alarmist, taxpayer - servant to call on his team to invoke such stunts more often).