Sentences with phrase «more an observation worth»

This is not one of my complaints by the way, more an observation worth noting.

Not exact matches

But I can not leave the subject without relaying a few more of his scattered observations, some of them aphoristic in form, all of them suggestive, all of them worth thinking about, and some of them, to be sure, inviting vigorous argument.

Using several years» worth of observations, they were able to build up a more complete picture of the magnetic field structure that supports the plasma, in structures known as prominences.

Observationally, the long signal gave the LIGO team much more room for confirmation of the observation, further proving the worth of gravitational wave astronomy under diverse circumstances.

The first observation worth making about these three goals is that we don't get to choose;... read more

That doesn't even include one to two more formal observations, two to three informal observations, two focus areas, two student learning objectives and one school wide goal and all with artifacts to prove your worth.

If school leaders just see them as more to get done, and teachers do not grow from the process, then observations really aren't worth the time.

He also makes reference to Hugh Howey's statement that the vast majority of midlist authors should be paid more attention to since they start to make a living from their writing and their income is worth a close observation.

I think its 99 pages are well worth reading, and if half or more of the observations get implemented by the CFA Institute, the Society of Actuaries, and Departments of Business, Finance, and Economics, the entire industry will be better off.

And the third aspect of exploration worth mentioning is more of a simple observation: What idiot called it No Man's Sky when it clearly should've been called No Man's Land?

«More than a century's worth of detailed climate observations shows a sharp increase in both carbon dioxide and temperature.

Lindzen has published a couple of hundred papers in climatology, so I think we can assume he knows that the statement «there has been no statistically significant warming since 1995» means nothing more than «given the variability in the data, we need at least 15 observations to reject the null hypothesis at 95 per cent confidence», a fact so trite as not to be worth mentioning.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.