Japanese buyers were liable for
more annual road tax for selecting the 2.6 l engine over the smaller engines The US version also featured a «Jet Valve», a small secondary intake valve which improved emissions by enhancing swirl in the combustion chamber, allowing for burning of a leaner mixture.
The 3.0 litre engine also obligated Japanese buyers to pay
more annual road tax which was also a consideration affecting purchases.
The 2.0 L non-turbo engine was replaced with a 2.3 L SOHC I4 engine, rated at 110 hp (82 kW), 127 lb · ft The 2.3 L engine was offered only in the US market, because the larger engine would have obligated Japanese consumers to pay
more annual road tax, thereby affecting sales, as well as the larger engine conflicted with Japanese government regulations concerning maximum displacement for cars classified as «compact».
[12] Japanese buyers were liable for slightly
more annual road tax over the smaller Civic, which had a smaller engine.
The installation of a 2.0 litre engine in Japanese models made buyers liable for
more annual road tax over the smaller 1.8 - litre engine, which affected sales.
Not exact matches
Because it costs
more than # 40,000, BMW M4s are liable for a # 310
tax surcharge in years two to six, bringing the
annual total to # 450, although after this period the
road tax bill will drop to # 140.
Tax thereafter will be # 140 a year, but as the GLE 63 costs more than double the # 40,000 threshold, you'll have to pay an extra # 310 a year for five years, so your total annual road - tax bill during this period will be # 4
Tax thereafter will be # 140 a year, but as the GLE 63 costs
more than double the # 40,000 threshold, you'll have to pay an extra # 310 a year for five years, so your total
annual road -
tax bill during this period will be # 4
tax bill during this period will be # 450.