Sentences with phrase «more backed systems»

Not exact matches

Contractors routinely go back to their clients with demands for more money to cover unexpected complexities in the building process; Gillam has set up rigorous risk - management systems to provide more accurate cost estimates.

This is the question I get most often about the hug your haters system: «What if I respond to a hater, and he replies back with something even more negative?»

Because these devices are small and easily misplaced, backing up your portable USB «computer» is arguably even more important than the backups you do for your main system.

One of the things we're most excited about is the future of food in this country, and how we could figure out ways to develop a more robust food system that actually pays back dividends locally.

More than three decades after the launch of the first space shuttle mission (and three years after the last one), investment in new human spaceflight systems is back with an intensity the aerospace industry hasn't seen since the heady days of the Space Race.

«A more logical usage [of zero - rating] would be if I was a cloud system backup program, if I back up your phone on the cloud, I don't need a fast internet connection to make that a feasible product.

Hartsock harks back to her own status as a Chilean immigrant in describing the less obvious, more emotional impact of lobbying Congress to maintain the H - 1B visa system.

As the craft continues to transmit photos back to Earth, scientists are learning more about the fascinating dwarf planet at the edge of our solar system.

It backs legislation in Congress that would provide more data to the background check system and calls for a ban on accessories like bump stocks that make firearms function more like automatic weapons.

The authors argue that what others perceive as a mess might actually be the result of a system where the «more important, urgent work tends to stay close by and near the top of the clutter» and the less important papers «tends to get buried to the bottom or near the back,» CNN reported.

The 1987 crash, he says, was more like «a bad day at the office; it came and went so fast... The bounce - back was quick, but it was a real shock to the system that that could happen.»

Regulators are now looking for alternatives to the conventional power grid, like microgrids, and are hoping that backing them up with renewable solar and wind power would reduce the bottlenecks in the power system and get the lights back on more quickly after a future disaster.

In Bring Back the Bureaucrats, I crudely calculated that we need about one million more full - time federal workers by 2035 in order to serve the public, stop draining its purse, start improving performance, and create an actual system of national public administration.

But let's back up for a second to make clear why «more equity and less debt» would make our banking system safer.

Many of the miners on Ethereum saw that going back to the old system may be more lucrative for them than the proof of stake system.

When the New York Times suggested in a July 20 op - ed («Our Doddering Mortgage Zombies,») that moving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of conservatorship was the best way to mend the U.S. housing finance system, NAHB Chairman Tom Woods fired back that more needs to be done and that «it's time for Congress to step up to the plate.»

Entrepreneurs, lawmakers, and activists want more of these small, closed - loop transmission systems called microgrids that are backed up with batteries to keep the power on all night.

My objections would have more to do with the lengths some might go to cut their taxes under such a system; selling stocks in droves right before tax season, giving gifts out to family and friends (perhaps with the intent to take them back after the tax man leaves), and of course, owning more assets outside of America.

Per El Al, their new business class cabin boasts a number of upgraded features including a dedicated business class crew, lie flat beds, ergonomic cushions to fully support the neck and back, 16 ″ personal HDTVs with touch screen capability (incorporating Panasonic's AVOD entertainment system), a personal comfort kit, and 30 % more overhead bin space compared to other airlines.

You can sit back and believe that «They are getting what they deserve» or that it's not that the system is broken, «it's just blacks like to commit more crimes,» or whatever you have to tell yourself to ease that feeling of guilt.

It must have been hell to thinking human beings back then... not knowing the basics of how our Solar System works... heck, we just figured out not that long ago that there is more to the universe than our galaxy.

Looking back on that experience I honestly don't think it was a spiritual event any more than many other events are (though I believe all events have a spiritual counterpart just as there are different physical levels of the universe way can overlay on any given system)

Methodist clergy agreed that in those first years they felt like Sisyphus condemned perpetually to roll a huge stone up a high hill only to have the stone roll back down again.4 In both the call system and the appointment system, beginning clergy tend to land in congregations that are so troubled or so marginal they can not attract more skilled and experienced clergy.

Look back at the Wall Street disaster of 2008, or the «Great Depression» before that, and TRY to find any system that has landed MORE people behind the poverty line in such a short span of time.

Visser «t Hooft turns the conversation back to the time before 1932: «In those days we believed that the League of Nations was the answer, that through the League it would be possible to create an international system of law, so that war would simply not be necessary any more.

The whole movement back to a commitment to the church started to make more sense when I reread Erik Erikson's discussion of identity as being tied to the discovery of an ideology, a belief system, which gives one a transcendent fix on the meaning and purpose for existence.

Your servers spend more time caring for customers, and less time running back and forth to the POS system.

Centerra's roots in the cooperative system go back more than 80 years, but its current incarnation was formed in 2017 from the merger of Western Reserve Farm Cooperative and Town & Country Co-op.

The ultimate goal for ChefMod is for its system to provide more information and to offer a fully integrated platform that provides operators with one back office solution.

With a heritage that extends back more than 75 years, the company specializes in the development of full flavor systems, custom flavor profiles and seasoning products — including supporting some of the world's largest and best - recognized food brands.

As the cooking vessel experiences no burn - on, it is possible to perform more back to back cooks with a Steam Infusion system without the possibility of for instance burnt contaminates appearing as flecks within the product.

Under the traditional tipping system, front of house (FOH) staff (servers, bartenders, etc.) make much more than back of house (BOH) staff (cooks, dishwashers, etc.).

MyFarm said it was actively discussing with investors «winding back the clock» to a different farm system that better suits lower, or more variable milk prices.

Walt Disney Parks and Resorts (Lake Buena Vista, Fla.) The Be Our Guest Restaurant utilizes a unique fast - casual restaurant system capable of automating elements throughout the operation, including RF table locators, ordering, checkout, back - of - the - house workflow and more to deliver a personalized, streamlined experience for guests that allows the operation to serve more than 3,000 meals at lunch each day.

Just like Rick Bayless did a few years back with Tortas Frontera (which now has a couple locations within the airport), Kahan and co. prove that it is actually possible to eat thoughtfully sourced, professionally served, beautifully cooked food in the seemingly ever - more post-apocalyptic hell that is our country's aviation system.

Will not buy a replacement, don't have a real DM any more, can't play in another system now, no back up for when AW finally thinks hey this Xhaka guy is not as good as i told myself the past 2 years.

Also it ought to enforce a more disciplined system of communication between the GK and the back four.

It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer

The Foxes will still have the massive Robert Huth but without Morgan they should be much more susceptible to balls into the box, which is why I think Arsenal should also go back to the old back four system and get the full backs to get forward and use the whole width of our pitch.

I don't know about Mings either for that matter but Mings might be a more available option (especially on a loan back system).

Wenger had the balls to stick with three at the back, and it made sense to keep the starting XI the same, as they were more used to the system in a competitive environment, rather than our other players.

Our rivals have not suffered a home defeat since Liverpool beat them there back in September, but more importantly, have been in spectacular fashion since we gave them a 3 - 0 beating at the Emirates Stadium, which led manager Antonio Conte to change his system.

I am still adamant we need more than just 1 more signing i say for our team to really compete we will need 3 GK (since we are looking like we are willing to sell the reserve 2) CM (A Partner for Xhaka in the middle) and CB (with the new 3 at the back system we need a certified defensive addition knowing the way we get plague with injuries)

playing with g - rod up front is like sticking to fingers up to traditional arsenal play of fast movement one twos and pass and move football this is very unlike wenger to make such a major shift away front his normal trends of style of play big man up front with no pace just isn't the wenger way really he needs to go back to the past really to answer the current problem i have noticed all the other top 4 teams are more wenger they are (wengerites to coin a phrase) than wenger himself playing with a big srtong pacey team like we use to have they all copied wengers blueprint and left him behind somewhere along the line and he altered his and its not been the same since do nt change a winning system of power and pace if it is was working for you mr wenger

This is EPL wenger should try and focus more on defence, our system is too much of attack whereas there is no superstar to do the magic, we only base on fast pass tempo, a well organized team, just need to keep the ball from us, play from the back, slow down the tempo and we are well beating.

In fact he has a well deserved reputation for developing young players and after Holding did so well as part of the new back three system towards the end of our last campaign I think us Gooners will be happy to see the boss give him more opportunity.

Also United can have Matic play in a more advanced central role is because they play with 4 at the back and not 3 at the back so your argument is irrelevant as you're not even comparing the same system.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Arsenal have changed their formation from a classic 442 to more of a 4231 over the years, but our current three at the back system looks revolutionary for the Gunners.

The midfielder could well prove to be more than strong enough to allow us to switch back to a back four, freeing up more players to attack, but would be a great addition regardless of his the system in place.