But if I'd had a better presentation at the end of the book, it might have led to
more backlist sales as a result.
Not exact matches
Authors seem to have realized the value of «
sales,» since at this point 31 % of original and 35 %
backlist titles have been either free or discounted at some point, substantially
more than last time around, especially for
backlist.
You can help prove the most critical assumption — that FaceBook marketing can drive
sales for full price
backlist books if it is done consistently and well (
more about that if your books qualify).
3) Opening up
backlist and some new products published by writers for readers to find can only HELP traditional publishing and their
sales on the same author's books, since
more readers can find the author.
For established clients, agents may assist in getting their
backlists on
sale again, and helping release digital shorts in between larger book releases (a strategy
more and
more authors are using to keep readers engaged and earn extra money in the process).
Most have no idea that they could earn
more being independent on even relatively modest
sales... Being a hybrid continues to give any author the greatest chance of building that all - important fan base without which none of us would make a living, and that's what any author should consider when thinking about adding independent titles to their
backlist: can you afford not to reach
more readers?»
The information is mixed; various Trade publishing houses have mentioned that one of the main facets on eBook
sales volume is because of the interest in buying
more «
backlist» titles.
I added up my
sales last week and multiplied by 52: without increasing at all (and I have 8
more backlist titles and 6 frontlist in the next year to upload) the math says over 1 million dollars earned in a year.
Being critical of many aspects of traditional publishing (the agent requirement, horrible contracts with
more poison pills in them than you'd find in a bottle of arsenic, lack of appreciation for long - tail
backlist sales) doesn't mean that the critic is beating up on authors who prefer that system, or who are contract bound into that system.
The lure of potential
sales will see
more ebooks published especially for
backlist titles that might once have had decent print
sales an area that might see an uptick too.
As an author with a «deep
backlist» of dozens of self - published titles that rarely (some never) make it out of
sales ranks in the millions, I know I have
more company (literally millions) than you've got in your top 7k, and I would love to see * that * part of the reality of self - publishing better represented by real statistics.
Specifically, J. K. Rowling decided to publish the e-book versions of the Harry Potter series herself, and I have personally heard a number of older authors talk about putting up some of the
backlist for
sale themselves and «making
more on it now than I ever did before.»
Sometimes, it's
more advantageous to keep a
backlist work «in print» despite low
sales.
As mentioned, Scout seems to be a
more attractive option for authors who already have a
backlist where those
sales will be boosted by a win.
I do wish, however, that they'd experiment
more, particularly with offering libraries per - checkout fees for their
backlist rather than inflated
sales prices linked to excessive restrictions.
They attributed their success this year to a number of factors, including an increase in skills, such as improved writing and marketing,
more books published, and
sales of
backlist and front list that grow each year.