But it would take
more blind faith to hope that Paxton could win a SB next year, than it would to hope ROmo would.
Not exact matches
You will just tend to be
more cautious than the bulls with
blind faith.
«The recent
blind faith some Republicans have shown toward free trade actually represents
more of an aberration than a hallmark of true American conservatism,» Lighthizer wrote in a Washington Post piece voicing his support for Trump in 2011.
Blind faith is way
more logical!!!
I did not pull anything from a flier.you seam to be an educated and knowledgeable person.maybe the law of entropy in thermodynamics is now outdated.most likely changed to try to make some scientists reasoning work.honestly what are the chances of the earth and man to come out of nothing.it takes
more faith or
blind fanaticism to believe that.
If you are too
blinded by your
faith to see that the facts we accept fit with reality
more than the apparent facts that you accept do, this is your issue - not ours.
How much
more do you believe by
blind faith?
But it is no
more a cop - out than a
blind person believing in the concept of «color» because the sighted person tells them it exists, and they are willing to accept it «on
faith.»
That same family sought me out a few years later; thanked me for forcing them to face a
blind spot in their
faith, and returned to church
more active and committed than ever.
Unless we learn to challenge our own beliefs the way we challenge others», whatever they may be can be no
more than a
blind faith at best or a delusion at worst, be that for or against religion (especially the puerile version of Christianity).
The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the
more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and
blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
It is not a bit of a stretch but an act of total
blind faith to believe in Evolution Dan, in fact it take
more faith to believe in that than in an all knowing, all powerful creator God who said I created all things.
Not by presenting us with
more evidence, but by appeals to our emotions and / or our fears: Either by using, «Our almighty, all - knowing god will protect you and give you eternal life (security and hope)», or, «Our righteous, just, and holy god will torture you for all eternity if you DO N'T make the jump (using
blind faith).»
Please: go to Amazon and look them up and READ one — or
more — , instead of assuming with
blind faith otherwise.
/ my IQ was 129 when tested at age 16, no idea what it is now, may have gone down for all i know, but i have to beleive that smarter people tend to be atheists, they have
more critical thinking and tend not to rely on
blind faith as much.
It is way easier, and
more comforting to have
blind faith.
Blind faith will not do in religion any
more than it will do in science, history, economics, etc..
Speaking as someone who does not, in fact, think one can know with absolute certainty that other people exist at all, and therefore «strongly believes» that indeed other «minds» exist, calling the blief that other minds exist nothing
more than «
blind faith» seems a little out there.
Until then, we're just happy that
more and
more people are losing their
blind faith every day.
This of course can not be the case so typically, especially among
blind faith believers, people will align themselves with one or the other and argue passionately for the view they have become convinced (or want) to be true whilst
more objective believers such as AW Tozer and CS Lewis recognize the dilemma.
You are merely following the
blind faith of hummanism and what is
more tragic is your self perception of intelligence.
I hope everyone read his quotes... because if anyone is a person of
faith... and that is not just someone that is a fanatic then you know it's true... and those who don't are even
more blind and clueless.
You are
blinded by your
faith (belief without evidence) and obviously don't care if what you believe is true or not, you only care that you get to think you're
more intelligent because you have a book written 2000 years ago, by 40 different men that provides what you believe to be the answers.
I was condemning religion, or
more specifically
blind faith (i.e. believing in something without proof).
This theory is no
more plausible or implausible than
blind faith except there actually is a large body of evidence to support this theory across all human cultures and «mythologies» (See Zecharia Sitchin, Rael, G. Cope Schellhorn, many others).
We now see that the leap of
faith is not just one leap; it is a leap repeatedly made, and a leap that becomes
more difficult to take the
more it is taken, reaching its pinnacle in
blind allegiance and active denial and rejection of any other possibilities.
So my question for the Wenger supporters is... how many
more years does one keep saying these things when defending Wenger, having this
blind faith and ignoring facts?
But as I said in my earlier I am interested in listening from people who don't share my opinion but not
blind faith statements but
more concrete grasps through the season and at the end of it rather than saying let's wait for end of season.
SEE
MORE: (Video) Former Invincible Gael Clichy sets up Arsenal equaliser at Man City with bizarre assist Arsene Wenger's
blind faith in Arsenal star exactly why he faces so much criticism Feature: Bewildering Hodgson
faith in Arsenal midfielder could spell bad news for Liverpool duo
i am optimistic by nature and even tho theres been some woeful displays in recent seasons i always go back and watch the next game even tho i id become dissapointed and disillusioned with our decline, but its not just about
blind faith and hope... the manager hasnt givin us much to get excited bout in a while and i think fans have been
more than patient..
My husband didn't get this question; there was way
more more blind faith that he could manage this new normal without having to make professional sacrifices.
Each of the three Heralds harbor their own sins and are perhaps even
more psychotic than that of Vaas or Pagan Min, each driven into a certain madness by their
blind faith to the Father.
His introduction comes with some glaring clichés: He's married to his job, his wife has replaced him with a
more emotionally available «lesser» man, and he has a son who has a whole lot of
blind faith in him.
Blind faith in technology and the infallibility of architects and builders is replaced by a better and
more direct understanding of how the school is to be used and managed.
However, I don't think we can allow our sentiments to obscure the fact that we can no longer afford to continue providing our children with schools that run on little
more than
blind faith and good intentions.
His
blind faith and charisma turning them into sounds
more melodious than the songs of angels.
But the greater the multiple &
blind faith it enjoys, the
more it risks being felled, if / when an abrupt change in sentiment finally hits... as we saw with Aryzta.
Each of the three Heralds harbor their own sins and are perhaps even
more psychotic than that of Vaas or Pagan Min, each driven into a certain madness by their
blind faith to the Father.
Coming up: «
Blind Faith — Between the Visceral and the Cognitive in Contemporary Art» - Group Exhibition March 2 — August 19, 2018 Haus der Kunst, Munich
More info
It's hard to say, though I'd have preferred
more of a position from Hancock; any opinion at all is better than being driven by
blind faith.
Here's an interesting link: (Header: The era of
blind faith in big data must end) «Algorithms decide who gets a loan, who gets a job interview, who gets insurance and much
more — but they don't automatically make things fair, and they're often far from scientific.