Sentences with phrase «more case law»

Also, while I can not speculate as to what the ultimate objectives of the Commissioner or the Bureau are, there have been rather few contested abuse of dominance cases in Canada and so it seems reasonable that at least one reason the case is proceeding is in an effort to generate more case law in this (in many ways unsettled) area in Canada.

Every day there is more case law on parties that are sanctioned for data spoliation.

More examples will allow me to find more case law from higher level courts, and this will assist my research and give more weight to the paper.

2014 is likely to see more case law addressing placement orders and also the medium - term effects of the shortened timescales within which care and supervision orders must be concluded.

«2014 is likely to see more case law addressing placement orders and also the medium - term effects of the shortened timescales within which care and supervision orders must be concluded,» she says.

Not exact matches

Businesses large and small have been making the case that they can't afford paying more for labour going back to when laws were first proposed to curb the use of seven year - olds in coal mines or put an end to 16 - hour workdays.

This is often the case in law when you receive a preliminary ruling that does not support your case or, as is often the case, a ruling that makes trial more difficult for both parties.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions called the caravan «a deliberate attempt to undermine our laws and overwhelm our system,» pledging to send more immigration judges to the border to resolve cases if needed.

The case raises an array of labour relations and employment law questions that will surely be answered in the weeks and months ahead as more information comes to light.

So far, he has been more keen to highlight the failure of the FBI to stop the Florida high school carnage and the need to fill loopholes in mental health care than to accept the case for changing firearms laws.

You can increase competition with anti-trust enforcement, and regulate natural monopolies and both (in the case of the newly merged Time Warner Cable), create greater transparency of prices, use government purchasing power, restore previous price controls (and please a federal usury law at no more than 15 %, to prevent debt bubbles of higher inflation).

That seems doomed to fail, as more than a century of case law dating back to the early days of the railroad suggests that provincial measures that directly thwart interprovincial infrastructure may be overruled by federal jurisdiction using 92 (10)(c) and this would be a prime example of when it should be (and has historically) been used.

Canadian mortgage laws are much more strict than in the United States — mortgages are full recourse, for example, so Canadian homeowners have a lot more on the line in the case of default than Americans.

Law enforcement in Broward County has taken steps to seize guns in more cases than anywhere in the state.

And in some instances, it has been Scalia and Thomas who have done so more than those who may think of themselves less as originalists (in one recent case in particular Scalia and Thomas dissented from the majority which held that convicted child molesters could be indefinitely imprisoned despite having fully served their sentences based on subtle shifts of language and the over-application of prior case law — no one wants a child molester free and about, but such results focused outcomes are always dangerous).

Yet even in the case of blood vengeance, biblical law at least keeps the system under the watchful eye of the elders, who arbitrate the claims of the respective parties, just as in the more direct cases of lex talionis.

That law would be form based upon the belief whether you believe that marriage is for growing families, in which case you make divorce difficult or marriage is based on personal happiness where a divorce law would be more relax.

The Bible certainly contains detailed instructions — e.g. the specifically Jewish Law of the Old Testament (although large parts of that are actually case law and as such are intended as examples to be more widely applied through common sensLaw of the Old Testament (although large parts of that are actually case law and as such are intended as examples to be more widely applied through common senslaw and as such are intended as examples to be more widely applied through common sense).

If I disagree with those laws, the way our healthcare system is set up, our care or lack of it for the poor and homeless, etc., there are avenues for me to contact my representatives and those whose voices are more likely to be heard than mine and plead my case.

IF the torture law was seen to work, and there was a dramatic decrease in violent crimes because bad people realized that they were okay with a death sentence, but 25 years of electric niple clamps was more than they were willing to take on, then the government could make the case that they enacted the will of the people by reducing crime.

In that case it resembles a man who remains true to himself and his nature and the law according to which he has first begun, who becomes identified more and more completely with his origin, expresses his enduring nature more and more, and in that way changes and yet remains precisely the same man.

But you can always make a case that every person has the potential to make society better or more advanced and bringing harm to another human being should be against the law.

Unless amended by the Senate, the law's conscience protections will be more meager than those currently afforded in the case of abortion.

You must not be paying attention to not only how people will be voting, but / and even more importantly the people (especially the hyper - religious) that are running for and getting voted into office are with zealotry... attempting, and in some cases passing laws that are based on their «religious beliefs.»

That he ran and was elected president on a platform of, as he says, treating people differently under the law — in this case not allowing gays to marry — renders this most recent articulation of ideological colonization all the more arrogant and ironic.

Absent such a change in canon law, a bishop seeking to dismiss a priest will have to convince a canon court that the case warrants dismissal, and thus the zero tolerance policy amounts to nothing more than a declaration by the bishops that, because in their view all cases of sexual abuse warrant dismissal from the clerical state, they intend to seek this penalty in all cases.

This is such a truism that one is almost ashamed to pen the words, and yet it remains a fact that, in a great deal of the more conservative biblical scholarship, it does seem to be assumed that the appeal to factual accuracy would he as valid and important a factor in the case of ancient Near Eastern religious texts as it would be in a modern western court of law or in a somewhat literally - minded western congregation.

In a more recent work, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier work.

Nothing has more reinforced my conviction on this score than the recent case of a lieutenant colonel, a rear admiral, a CIA chief and a president conspiring to set themselves above the law, and insisting that we citizens should let them lie to us for our own good.

The situation in Europe, including Britain, is more nuanced than that in North America, largely because Europe's Muslim populations have a longer and more established social and political history in nations where Muslims (of the theological left, right and center) are represented by sophisticated networks of» mosques and political NGOs that defend the rights of Muslims and shape their participation in civic life, including the introduction of Islamic law for civil cases.

More importantly, though, my extended experience, as formalized in scientific laws, tells me that in all those cases in which I personally experience, or believe lam observing, self - determining activity, such activity is the product of a central nervous system.

The HL case does nothing more than to confirm the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of Nov. 1993, which was a near unanimous decision among Democrats (3 dissenters) where the law protects folks» religious freedoms wherever they feel they are being violated.

And if that's the case, are ALL politicians THAT stupid??? That is, to pass «bad» laws just because it will win them more votes?

In other cases the interaction of different laws is much more complicated.

The existence of the second law of thermodynamics and the existence of local enclaves of decreasing entropy, as is the case with life, means that less ordered systems within the whole system of the universe have become more ordered.

That's one of the huge issues today — young and healthy people assume they don't need health care — or in some cases, can not get health care — perhaps as youths they had medical conditions — and prior to Obama's new law — there were more restrictions as to whom qualified as a dependent under their parents policy.

And we could say still further: A style of judging that insists on focusing, in a demanding way, on whether the law is justified fits more aptly the true character of law, whether the judges get the answer in the case right or wrong.

He attempted to enforce clerical celibacy, forbade pluralism, (the holding of two or more church offices and drawing the income from them), endeavored to exclude lay interference in ecclesiastical affairs, affirmed the right of Rome to review important cases under canon law and thus increased appeals to the Holy See, ordered that tithes for the support of the Church be given precedence over all other taxes, and took vigorous measures for the suppression of heresy.

In the Roman case, Coontz isn't entirely wrong in calling it a contract, insofar as marriage law would more often than not be adjudicated in the civil courts just like a contract law.

This is all the more striking as» what Luke could not foresee» the rules on inheritance were to become one of the trickiest and most developed in Islamic religious law, a nest of case studies for students of legal theory.

A thoughtful public may eventually decide that they are not merely unwilling but unable to make a theological case for their position, Since there are so many more people who support reproductive choice, they may succeed in foot - dragging the nation away from a prohibition - era scenario, and may thus win respect for law.

Such was Paul's dynamic theology, and Erasmus had failed, so Luther judged, to understand on the one hand the relative dignity and goodness of the Law, on its own merits, and on the other the fact that in any case to keep it was useless, and indeed largely impossible for most men without Christ: «Fulfilment without faith in Christ, even if it creates men like Fabricius, Regulus and others [heroes of Roman history] who are wholly irreproachable in the sight of men — no more resembles righteousness than sorb apples resemble figs.»

There isn't roomhere to do more than illustrate the case with a few examples, but an attempt will be made to show how rich Paul's view of ethics is, how his teaching on law is original and relevant, how his emphasis on love is important, and how he forces us to consider not only the human act that, as St Thomas says, is what moral theology is all about, but also the adjectival human agent transformed by the grace of the Holy Spirit into a friend, indeed a child of God.

The conclusion that an innocuous disclaimer constitutes an establishment of religion needs more basis in law than a passing reference to unspecified «facts and circumstances of this case.»

Much depends on the outcome of the CAS case against Manchester City — if Man C win then the laws relating to trading in players have more or less gone.

Even if a state's concussion safety law does cover community - based, private sports programs, very few states have enacted laws that cover all aspects of youth sports safety, such as requiring more broad - based safety training for coaches in first - aid, CPR, and the use of an AED, and the development and implementation of an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) to be triggered in case of medical emergencies, such as a cardiac event (e.g. sudden cardiac arrest), asthma attack, allergic reaction to a bee sting, or heat stroke, and environmental emergencies (lighting, tornado, or an excessively high heat index).

Wives were far more likely than husbands to report attempting to enlist the help of outsiders, from divorce attorneys to in - laws, marriage counselors, and psychologists (and in one case a bankruptcy attorney), to solve marital problems.

I will have to pass this along to my sister in law in case she decides to have more children.

The trial of three former leaders of the law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf was declared a mistrial today, after more than four months, by the judge overseeing the case.

@Machavity Case law has interpreted the constitutional prohibition on state level participation in foreign affairs more broadly although there are a few things are are permitted (e.g. sister city relationships, budgetary decisions with international implications).