Broadly speaking, do parents need
more choice in public education?
Not exact matches
On a number of specific policies, notably parental
choice in education, and,
more important, on principles regarding the right ordering of religion and
public life, JCS is usually and sometimes harshly opposed to the position of the Catholic Church.
Attitudes: support for diversity (racial integration), a perception of inequity (that the
public schools provide a lower quality
education for low - income and minority kids), support for voluntary prayer
in the schools, support for greater parent influence, desire for smaller schools, belief
in what I call the «
public school ideology» (which measures a normative attachment to
public schooling and its ideals), a belief
in markets (that
choice and competition are likely to make schools
more effective), and a concern that moral values are poorly taught
in the
public schools.
by Brett Wigdortz, founder and CEO, Teach First; Fair access: Making school
choice and admissions work for all by Rebecca Allen, reader
in the economics of
education at the Institute of Education, University of London; School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education at the Institute of
Education, University of London; School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
Education, University of London; School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and
Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of
Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief
education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer
in science
education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum
more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of
education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity
in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer
in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy
in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people
in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of
education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of
Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or
education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University o
education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of
Education, University o
Education, University of London.
In response to widespread demands for better public education and for more choice among public schools, a number of state legislatures in the early 1990s permitted educators and local communities to develop charter school
In response to widespread demands for better
public education and for
more choice among
public schools, a number of state legislatures
in the early 1990s permitted educators and local communities to develop charter school
in the early 1990s permitted educators and local communities to develop charter schools.
The growth of for - profit online schools, one of the
more overtly commercial segments of the school
choice movement, is rooted
in the theory that corporate efficiencies combined with the Internet can revolutionize
public education, offering high quality at reduced cost.
Potter, who like many
education reformers supports
public school
choice in the form of charter schools but opposes vouchers, argues Nevada's private schools will be exempt from requirements to teach the
more challenging students, including those with disabilities or those from poor families.
Tom Luna, Idaho Supt. of
Public Instruction: «Fortunately for Idaho the kinds of things that they're looking for are the kinds of things we've been working on for a number of years: pay - for - performance for teachers, expanding choice in public education through more charter schools, more accountability down to the student level.&
Public Instruction: «Fortunately for Idaho the kinds of things that they're looking for are the kinds of things we've been working on for a number of years: pay - for - performance for teachers, expanding
choice in public education through more charter schools, more accountability down to the student level.&
public education through
more charter schools,
more accountability down to the student level.»
Critics were disappointed
in her emphasis on school
choice, rather than the need for
more resources dedicated to special
education in public schools.
«If Dan Patrick and his followers wanted to give all students and their parents a meaningful educational
choice, they would
more adequately fund
public education, so that children of all economic backgrounds would have a full menu of academic offerings and electives
in their neighborhood
public schools,» said Texas State Teachers Association President Noel Candelaria.
From centrist Democrats who think that
choice should only be limited to the expansion of
public charter schools (and their senseless opposition to school vouchers, which, provide money to parochial and private schools, which, like charters, are privately - operated), to the libertarian Cato Institute's pursuit of ideological purity through its bashing of charters and vouchers
in favor of the voucher - like tax credit plans (which explains the irrelevance of the think tank's
education team on
education matters outside of higher ed), reformers sometimes seem
more - focused on their own preferred version of
choice instead of on the
more - important goal of expanding opportunities for families to provide our children with high - quality teaching and comprehensive college - preparatory curricula.
This annual survey — developed and reported by EdChoice and interviews conducted by our partner, Braun Research, Inc. — measures
public opinion and awareness on a range of K — 12
education topics, including parents» schooling preferences, educational
choice policies, the federal government's role
in education and
more.
For
more than 40 years, Miami - Dade County
Public Schools has been at the forefront of the
choice movement
in education.
The plan promoted by Trump and
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos widened a divide
in the school -
choice movement and brought swift condemnation from people who support
more competition for
public schools
in the form of charter schools but oppose sending tax money to private institutions.
But commissioners could not reach a policy consensus on two other divisive issues
in state
public education — Michigan's expansive charter school landscape, and the state's generous schools - of -
choice law, under which
more than 120,000 students attend a
public school outside of district boundaries.
With National School
Choice Week behind us, the battle — and it is a battle — to free our children from a monopoly by zip - code
public education system is being fought on fronts all over the country, and
in red and blue states alike,
more and
more Democrats are breaking ranks and joining Republicans
in the fight.
Our antiquated
education delivery system should be allowed to evolve from a «school system» to a «system of schools», with comprehensive traditional
public school
choice, expanded charter school capability, access to
more choices for special needs children, and a fully paid exit option for students
in failing schools.
Public charter schools were authorized by the Texas Legislature in 1995 to provide more choice and options in public educ
Public charter schools were authorized by the Texas Legislature
in 1995 to provide
more choice and options
in public educ
public education.
Her supporters say those measures offer parents
more choices, but her critics say they drain resources from the
public education system, the most important civic institution
in the United States.
In fact, one can advocate for a much more expansive definition of public education: one that offers greater parental choice in a system that is responsive to local community and parental demand, while absolutely shunning for - profit elementary and secondary school
In fact, one can advocate for a much
more expansive definition of
public education: one that offers greater parental
choice in a system that is responsive to local community and parental demand, while absolutely shunning for - profit elementary and secondary school
in a system that is responsive to local community and parental demand, while absolutely shunning for - profit elementary and secondary schools.
School
choice is an increasingly popular issue
in state legislatures nationwide as
more and
more states consider expanding educational options to help children get a better
education, spur
public school improvement, and save taxpayer dollars.
«The growth of for - profit online schools, one of the
more overtly commercial segments of the school
choice movement, is rooted
in the theory that corporate efficiencies combined with the Internet can revolutionize
public education, offering high quality at reduced cost,» the article notes.
Bruce, the «hype and hoopla» Caroline usually refers to are some high profile charter schools that have touted successes not necessarily deserved, though other pro-reform issues are also part of her agenda to impugn any efforts to create
more parental
choice in public education.
A report commissioned by the Connecticut State Department of
Education entitled Evaluating the Academic Performance of
Choice Programs
in Connecticut compared student achievement
in public schools, charter schools, magnet schools, and among those students bussed from urban areas to the suburbs and did not find evidence that students
in charter schools had greater achievement than other students, even with their
more select student body.
For example, a family that takes the time and effort to apply to a charter school, might be
more involved
in their student's
education than a family that just sends their student to the neighborhood school, and that might be why we see
choice school students performing better than the traditional
public school students.
Improved financial oversight as outlined
in this report and improved financial transparency for the
public, including parents, would enable parents to make
more informed
choices regarding their child's
education and make charters
more accountable to taxpayers.
They offer quality and
choice in the
public education system and have the freedom to be
more innovative while being held accountable for helping students learn and achieve.
In addition to garnering
public opinion on standardized testing, the poll explores an array of
education «hot topics,» including Common Core, school
choice, school performance, school funding, vaccinations, and
more.
Recommendations: Improved financial oversight as outlined
in this report and improved financial transparency for the
public, including parents, would enable parents to make
more informed
choices regarding their child's
education and make charters
more accountable to taxpayers.
Backers of vouchers, who tend to be Republicans, argue that they give
more educational
choices, allowing children the opportunity to receive a better
education than they might
in public schools.
Gainful employment data would help prospective students make
more informed
choices regarding legal
education, and
in the process help law schools regain the
public trust.