Not exact matches
U.S. regulators said on Tuesday that Uber Technologies agreed to do
more to protect the privacy of customer and driver data in settling allegations that the ride - hailing company
had made deceptive privacy and data security
claims.
I know busy CEOs will
claim they don't
have time for this, but the reality is that I am
more productive and
make better decisions that payoff in the long run when I function in joy zone.
Now comes word of
more legal woes: The cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles
have sued the company over allegations that it overcharges consumers, as well as
makes misleading
claims about the safety of its service.
Holmes and Theranos
made waves in Silicon Valley and the diagnostics industry two years ago, when investors lined up to boost the valuation of a company that
claimed it
would soon offer
more than 1,000 varieties of blood diagnostics tests without the need for a syringe.
But when you
claim that you
've «beaten» your main competitor, Lyft, and say that an additional service will be
more expensive and you hear that people don't trust you anymore because things keep changing and they can't
make rational plans, getting angry and blaming them isn't the solution.
«Yelp
has never done this and individuals
making such
claims are either misinformed, or
more typically,
have an axe to grind — whether businesses upset that Yelp will not remove reviews they don't like, or unscrupulous internet marketing «experts» trying to
make a buck off of honest business owners with dubious reputation management schemes.»
«The
more people think they know about a topic, the
more likely they are to
claim that totally
made - up facts are true, psychologists
have found,» PsyBlog notes.
Apple
has claimed that helping the FBI create software to help retrieve data from Farook's iPhone sets a bad precedent that could ultimately
make user information on its devices
more vulnerable to hackers.
To
claim so
would be to ignore longer - term trends, including extreme gerrymandering and the rise of political dark money that
make elected officials
more likely to appeal to extremes.
Tillerson responded to the questions, along with others about Putin's opponents winding up dead, with what's likely to become a familiar refrain for the executive as
more allegations about Russia come to the fore: «I do not
have sufficient information to
make that
claim.»
Vendors
claim that gamification can lead to a 100 to 150 percent pickup in engagement metrics including unique views, page views, community activities and time on site, according to M2 Research, and 63 percent of American adults agree that
making everyday activities
more like a game
would make them
more fun and rewarding, JW Intelligence reports.
«I
would like
more oversight and transparency around restaurant menu labeling, with better data to support
claims made to consumers,» Yates says.
Interestingly, studies
have contradicted those
claims, with one study finding that for some people, clutter can actually
make a person
more productive.
In recent years,
more than 50 women — recall that striking New York Magazine cover —
have made remarkably similar
claims against the 80 - year - old, but only Constand's were adjudicated at the criminal trial.
We
've already
made modest progress: in February, Canada and China signed a Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement, which the federal government
claims will
make doing business in China safer and
more predictable for Canadians.
That
claim, however, is premised on the idea that a buyer who uses PRIMARQ
would have purchased the same home without PRIMARQ, and not
have opted for a less expensive home, on which they could
more easily afford to
make a down payment.
Citron
claimed in the paper that Nvidia
had become «casino stock» since investments were
made more on future potential instead of long - term guarantees.
Our only mistake was to not
make David our keynote speaker and give him
more presentation time as our audience of sales and marketing executives
claimed that he
had the best presentation and offered the most valuable information.
To
make the
claim that cryptocurrency is
more stable than traditionally capitalistic currency
would be absurd, but cryptocurrency is definitively less susceptible to the same problems that
make our currency as unstable as it is.
The DOJ sued AT&T last fall
claiming that the deal
would dramatically raise prices for consumers, largely because AT&T will likely try its best to
make it harder and
more expensive for competitors to license the content (like HBO) essential to competing with AT&T.
Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results in nothing
more than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably
make a private securities fraud
claim to try and claw back some of their capital; assuming a court will determine a presale of digital tokens to be a private placement of securities, any such federal
claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.
This is another situation where
having a separate structure might
make your
claim more simple.
Finally, GM's quick repayment of the loans
has whetted the appetite of some commentators (including DeCloet) for the ultimate repayment of the full government contribution. That
would occur through the issuance of public equity by GM and Chrysler, creating a market for those stocks into which the government
would presumably sell its shares. There is even some nefarious language in the rescue packages requiring the government to sell off its shares within specified, relatively aggressive timelines. The
more I think about it, the less this
makes sense — neither for the auto industry, nor for taxpayers. Why not hang onto the equity stake? If the companies recover and the equity gains market value, then the government will be able to
claim that on its balance sheet (hence officially recouping the cost of its written - off contributions and creating a budgetary gain).
A third option
would be to
make a
more aggressive push for independence
claiming that Spain
has just again violated their rights.
Controversial evangelist Tony Anthony
has republished his supposed autobiography, Taming the Tiger, despite
claims that large parts of it were
made up...
More
Perhaps
more are seeing through the excuses
made by early Xtian apologists —
claiming that the gospels weren't copy - cat stories, but that Satan
had made a pre-emptive strike to confuse.
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff
more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation
has not
made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the
claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
That is
having the hubris to
make the
claim that there are groups and categories
more sinful in the sight of the Lord than any group that includes me.
The atheist who
claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and
more to be pitied than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they
claim to
have forsaken, they
would ultimately
have appeared before God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met God, they never knew God and they never understood God.They are devoid of the Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe Gods gift of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled to God, but their lying nature
makes salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.God bless
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the
claims i
make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.
More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who
has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of
has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God
has not yet revealed to mankind but every day
more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who
would reject Him.
using your argument we
would had civil rights in this country just because goverments
make certain practices illegal does tat mean that what the goverrmet s doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it
claim to power through this we
have the start of the Roman Catholic Church one of the most insidious evil organzations on this planet which as doe
more to oppose ad kill true follewers of Christ then ay group o this planet.
Arguably Holloway is doing no
more than drawing out the implications of St. Paul's
claim that in Christ God
has «
made known to us in all wisdom and insight the mystery of his will, according to his purpose which he set forth in Christ as a plan for the fulness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.»
A former singer in a leading US Christian metal band
has claimed that, like him, many «Christian» bands are
made up of people who
have lost their religious...
More
MyMainMan, one other point I
'd like to
make: If you're going to support Sagan's
claim that athiests must presume to
have much
more knowledge than the rest of us, then the exact same must apply to Theists (those who believe in God).
I
have grown convinced that
more often than not it is sheer ignorance, sheer lack of study of the actual records, which
makes clever as well as foolish men say, «Well, of course, he was a great teacher, but I can not accept the
claim that he was divine.»
Crazy people
claim lots of things but something tells me that if a random person on the street told you that he could fly, you
would be a skeptic but
make him a
more upstanding member of society and all of a sudden it's not so insane?
You
have made this
claim against me on
more than one occasion but the truth of the matter is that we are talking about two totally different concepts.
Tell me, if God (or,
more likely, someone
claiming to speak for God, or your understanding of what he supposedly said changed) said tomorrow that murdering certain individuals was OK,
would that suddenly
make that morally acceptable?
But it is equally important not to
make extravagant
claims or hold groundless hopes on the assumption of
more freedom than we
have.
B, which religions are you talking about when you
make the large
claim, «In other religions we
have no pretense that someone is talking about his own private vision, or that stuff is
more or less poetic.
It's like a small scared child in a dark room
claiming there is some monster out there in the darkness so you turn on the lights to show him there is no monster, but he just get's
more scared
claiming the monster must
have hid in the closet or under the bed or anywhere you havn't yet looked, and when you do look and show them nothing is there it doesn't
make them relieved, they get
more upset because they now believe the monster is super fast or invisible or can teleport, because they know it's there, they can just feel it!
Trump wants to give «priority» to non-Muslims, despite the fact that
more Christians than Muslims
have been resettled since 9/11: The executive order says it will «prioritize refugee
claims made by individuals on the basis of religious - based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality.»
So you
claim Maccabees, Enoch, Jubilees, Psalms 152 - 155, the Prayer of Solomon, Ascension of Isaiah, Baruch, Ethiopic Lamentations and many
more to be complete modern fabrications that were never included by early Christians or Jews in their early canons thus
making the current version the only true version that
has ever actually existed?
From Peirce's
claim that we can
make our ideas clear by considering their conceivable practical effects, to James's notion of truth's cash value in experiential terms, to Dewey's own view of the practical character of reality, the message seems to be that philosophy
has more to offer than a therapeutic stance toward social issues and a rhetorical presentation of new suggestions.
So the vacationing Carl Scott
made the following observation that I think deserves
more attention than it will get in the comments section: The key here is Peter's 35 state
claim [Peter Lawler passing on a story from the Politico that Santorum
would lose 35 states.]
For Christians, admittedly, the question was
made more difficult by the
claim that God
had chosen to reveal Himself in Jesus Christ.
It also says that electrons and protons are societies, but it gives no indication as to whether they are spatially thick, structured societies (my view) or enduring objects (Cobb's view) except where Whitehead speculates about the dimly discerned «yet
more ultimate actual entities — this could be taken to imply that electrons and protons are complex,
made up of distinct types of subordinate entities, and this
would support my
claim that electrons and protons are structured societies.
you really
have to dig thru some sh-t to get to the gems, modern christians who
claim the founding fathers on their side should keep this in mind, these men where largely liberal intellectuals with a practical bent and where not the judeo / christian zealots that some try and
make them out to be, jeffersons take on jesus is wonderful and it is useful in the modern world where we really need to focus
more on the lessons of jesus than THE RULES in the entire bible, as jesus said ABOVE ALL ELSE love neighbor as yourself, jefferson
had a great mind and his approach to spiritual matters like this is great
i wonder whih god will be
more pleased with its slave — the one who murdered a man for his beliefs or the one who allowed his follower to die for his faith either way — god is a man
made belief system that is only a few thousand years old — and in that time, no one single thing
has killed
more humans, than a man
claiming to know the will of some kind of god Faith is good thing, faith in one's self.
Interesting that as mankind's ability to record events
more and
more faithfully
has increased, the less we hear about
claims of gods
making their presence known.