Sentences with phrase «more corporate debt»

Not exact matches

But low interest rates, at least in Canada, have pushed household debt to such vertiginous levels that officials like Carney know they shouldn't be counting on consumer spending to drive the recovery — ergo, the call for more corporate investment.

But analysts say more still needs to be done on structural reforms to rein in ballooning corporate debt, which has reached levels that the IMF and others have warned sharply raises the risks of a financial crisis.

Allowing the corporate tax cuts to fade would save roughly the same, if not slightly more money, against the debt, analyses show.

Forbes also opposed the purchases of corporate debt — something the BoE did briefly after the financial crisis, but more to aid market functioning than to boost growth.

Interest in developing alternative sources of debt for Australian corporates is growing as more superannuation funds, borrowers and banks di...

The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value — weighted index of investment - grade fixed - rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset - backed, and mortgage - backed securities, with maturities of one year or more.

The only variables he admits are structure - free: The federal government can indeed spend more and reduce interest rates (especially on mortgages) so that the higher mortgage debt, student debt, personal debt and corporate debt overhead can be afforded more easily.

Interest and amortization payments to savers tend to increase beyond the economy's overall ability to pay as debt service absorbs more and more personal disposable income and corporate cash flow.

Corporate debt in emerging markets has more than doubled since 2008 to at least $ 18 trillion in 2014, according to an International Monetary Fund research paper in December.

All told, though, the plan is, like its House counterpart, a proposal to dramatically slash corporate tax rates, open up a big new loophole for wealthy individuals, and pay for the cuts by dramatically expanding the national debt and ending a number of tax deductions that could leave a substantial share of middle - and upper - middle - class people paying more.

The $ 1.2 trillion high - yield debt market could face a double whammy as spreads tighten and investors use the corporate earnings season starting in the second week of October as an excuse to take even more profits.

Many analysts argue that total debt in China in fact exceeds TSF, and believe that the true debt level is closer to 250 % of GDP, and perhaps even more if we include the substantial number of corporate receivables that have surged in recent years.

Consequently, U.S. Treasury yields have, over the last 30 years, declined more than high - quality corporate debt yields, yields on productive business capital and S&P 500 earnings.

You'd think that corporate debt would grow in proportion to total sales, as this additional debt is used to fund investments in productive activities that create more sales and contribute to the economy, and that higher sales, and presumably higher earnings would create a proportionate increase in the value of the company, and thus in its stock price, and that they all go up together, not in lockstep but over time more or less at the same rate.

The rotation from long to short term is much more pronounced when it comes to funds dedicated to investment grade corporate debt.

Based on recent corporate leverage, this decline in the cost of debt would increase the typical company's return on equity by more than four percentage points.

Delaying the corporate - tax - rate reduction was one of many tough choices Senate leaders made as they tried to craft a bill that would lower taxes but also add no more than $ 1.5 trillion to the debt over 10 years.

Since 2010, U.S. corporate debt has been growing at an annualized rate of more than 5.5 %.

Income Strategy can own high - yield corporate debt, income - paying common stock, preferred shares, convertible securities, REITs, business development companies, MLPs and more.

In recent months, the yield on US corporate bonds, especially investment - grade securities, is a little more than 100 basis points compared to the yield on government debt, dropping within striking distance of the lows seen post the 2008 financial crisis.

In all, so - called «reverse Yankee credits» account for more than 20 % of European corporate debt issuance so far this year, feeding a patriotism of sorts in continental financial circles.

Investors are hungry for high quality, multibillion - dollar debt deals, as shown by Anheuser - Busch InBev Finance Inc. of Belgium's success with two corporate bonds totaling more than $ 60 billion in 2016.

No asset may prove more prescient than the heart of the QE distortion: corporate debt.

As described in more detail in a recent article in the November RBA Bulletin, [6] Australian CDO issues are mostly backed by corporate debt, with corporate bonds and loans accounting for 57 per cent and 27 per cent respectively.

The market «prices in» the tax - deductible feature on municipal coupon payments, so when you aren't a beneficiary of said tax treatment, then I (at least) believe it makes more sense to get tax - free income on higher yield corporate debt (of the same credit profile).

Trying to anticipate the changing environment, and high corporate debt levels, suggest it would be wise to start taking a more defensive position on equities long before yields on 10 - year Treasuries reach 5 %.

Interest in developing alternative sources of debt for Australian corporates is growing as more superannuation funds, borrowers and banks discuss ways for retirement schemes to lend directly to companies.

Thus, I believe the Fed's articulation of a lower terminal policy rate in the longer run is much more important for the mortgage markets and for corporate capital expenditures financed through the debt markets than is a modest increase in short rates.

Despite consensus optimism, non-bank financial institutions» appetite for corporate debt is being cited as a source of risk by more prudent institutions.

It's also interesting to examine the changing significance and dynamics of the European bond market in general, which has almost doubled in size since 2005 to more than $ 10 trillion today, including government, investment - grade corporate debt and high yield.

Corporate and government debt have been soaring for years, but investor appetite for such debt has evidently grown even more.

Yet, even if political concern doesn't materialize into action, a more systemic problem remains: rising interest rates combined with the toxic mix of corporate inequality and debt.

Our Asset Based Lending Group provides debt capital solutions of $ 10 million or more to our commercial, corporate and investment banking clients through customized funding solutions across the credit spectrum.

CORPORATE FINANCING NEWS: CORPORATE DEBT By Gordon Platt Distressed debt and bankruptcy restructurings completed in 2012 more than doubled from 2011 to $ 423 billion, according to Thomson ReutDEBT By Gordon Platt Distressed debt and bankruptcy restructurings completed in 2012 more than doubled from 2011 to $ 423 billion, according to Thomson Reutdebt and bankruptcy restructurings completed in 2012 more than doubled from 2011 to $ 423 billion, according to Thomson Reuters.

The past several years have featured little more than a gigantic asset swap, the short description being that massive volumes of government debt have been swapped by central banks for massive volumes of idle bank reserves, while massive volumes of low - yielding, covenant - lite debt have been issued into the hands of yield - seeking investors, in order to retire massive volumes of corporate equities at elevated valuations through buybacks.

AbbVie, the pharmaceutical unit of Abbott Laboratories, sold $ 14.7 billion worth of bonds in the largest offering in the US corporate debt market in more than three years.

The Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate Index is a market - weighted index of investment - grade corporate fixed - rate debt issues with maturities of one yearCorporate Index is a market - weighted index of investment - grade corporate fixed - rate debt issues with maturities of one yearcorporate fixed - rate debt issues with maturities of one year or more.

As of August 1, yields on some prime funds, which primarily invest in riskier corporate debt and may pay higher yields, were as high as 1.2 % for a minimum initial investment $ 2,500 to $ 1 million or more, with an industry average 0.64 %.

Since 2012, there has been USD 1.3 trillion [2] of U.S. high - yield corporate debt issued — more than the total amount issued in the prior 10 - year period (2002 - 2011).

For High Net worth Individuals or corporates, using debt mutual funds turns out to be more tax - effective.

The debt portfolio of the fund consists of high quality corporate bonds and G - secs with more than 80 % investment in AAA rated securities and rest in AA rated.

Outstanding corporate debt stands at $ 7.5 trillion in 2010, accounting for more than 20 percent of U.S. fixed - income securities.

An open ended debt scheme predominantly investing in AA and below rated corporate bonds (excluding AA + rated corporate bonds) Read More

Corporate debt will become more expensive as well, specifically for the companies that do not sport the AAA rating.

Since 2010, U.S. corporate debt has been growing at an annualized rate of more than 5.5 %.

Strategy: This fund is primarily invested in fixed income securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, or instrumentalities, and corporate debt instruments, including but not limited to asset - backed and mortgage - backed securities rated not less than Baa3 / BBB - by two or more nationally recognized rating services.

Net Financial Debt is more important than ever because of the corporate trend to leave cash overseas and borrow domestically.

Now expense ratios are more so relevant for those funds which invest in debt such as corporate bonds, government securities, government treasury bills, etc..

When credit markets are not functioning properly and there is fear of corporate default, it is simply more expensive to issue debt.

No asset may prove more prescient than the heart of the QE distortion: corporate debt.