Sentences with phrase «more correct analysis»

It appears to me that a more correct analysis would note in equilibrium for a given layer energy out must equal energy in.

Not exact matches

The indirect analysis herein can not prove that Israel's interception claims were incorrect, any more so than interception proponents can prove they were correct.

O'Leary's analyses of balance sheets and corporate shenanigans were cutting, funny and correct more often than not, if memory serves.

Medical authorities W. D. Edwards, W. J. Gabel and F. E. Hosmer, much more in tune with medical accuracy than that of correct theology in reference to the Gospels, offer the following analysis in regard to the New Testament Greek and the medical data: «Jesus of Nazareth underwent Jewish and Roman trials, was flogged, and was sentenced to death by crucifixion.

However, Albarracin said the analysis also showed that debunking is more effective — and misinformation is less persistent — when an audience develops an explanation for the corrected information.

In all subjects, the pattern produced in response to each question was quantitatively more similar to the pattern observed in the localizer scan for the imagery task that was associated with the factually correct answer; this answer was verified after the analysis.

However, these correlations emerge only through multivariate analyses that control for the more dominant correlations of test scores with demographic variables — systematics for which graduate admissions committees rarely correct quantitatively.

If the calculations that Dutch scientists made are correct, you burn more than 5 grams of fat extra for every cup of green tea you drink, according to a meta - analysis published by Rick Hursel in Obesity Reviews.

We do not publish Accountability Report Cards publicly for schools below CCSA Criteria until schools have had an opportunity to correct potential demographic data errors (like all other schools) and / or work with us to identify individual student level longitudinal analysis that may be even more precise than our Similar Students Measure (SSM).

This article is a lite version of our intensive scientific analysis of smartphone and tablet mobile displays — before the benefits of our advanced mathematical DisplayMate Display Optimization Technology, which can correct or improve many of the deficiencies — including higher calibrated brightness, power efficiency, effective screen contrast, picture quality and color and gray scale accuracy under both bright and dim ambient light, and much more.

As part of our advisory service, however, we conduct a more comprehensive analysis of a client's financial situation - also looking at a client's debt, tax wrapper usage and already invested amounts to provide the client with a recommendation regarding a suitable investment solution, restricted to the Scalable Capital portfolios, as well as the correct tax wrapper for their situation.

In the world of binary options trading there is nothing more important than the issue of finding the correct and the perfect balance between the analysis and the expiration date of your option.

Perhaps he should focus on proxies which don't have issues and then perform a correct analysis without prejudgement — that sounds more like a scientific approach.

I suggest a flaw in analysis which is the apparent segmentation of the Upper Air profile, in the Arctic, the real action is happening between 1000 and 650 mb, segmenting upper air levels 850,700, and 500 mb reduces resolution and misses some real important air volumes at higher pressures, where anything can happen between 1000 and 850, 850 and 750 mb etc... Raobcore profile looks a little unrealistic, and it is likely that the models are more correct for the lower troposphere than Raobcore.

One reason why these estimates keep getting revised is that there is a continual updating of the observational analyses that are used — as new data are included, as non-climatic factors get corrected for, and models include more processes.

Actually more the opposite (if their analysis were correct) since the clouds under consideration have a higher greenhouse effect associated with them, not a higher albedo effect.

If I am correct about that, then the more the 41k period is used to determine relative position of sequences within the chronology, or the duration of individual sequences; the weaker will be a strong 41k signal from fourier analysis as evidence that the 41k signal was not an artifact.

And a risk analysis based on a symmetrical view of IPCC overconfidence bias will end up risk - weighting toward the more catastrophic side and indicating a more strictly regulatory (how I wish I could use the correct word, «conservative», here) policy.

Compare the SAR and the TAR for example, and since then we have many more proxy reconstructions to consider, the satellite analyses corrected, new data about energy imbalances, better observations of ocean currents and temperature, ice sheet behaviour in Greenland and Antarctica and much much more.

The headline says «analysis» but «regurgitation» would be more correct, as it simply repeats the claims of various articles without considering the implications, or whether these claims make sense at all.

a fan of * MORE * discourse: Other conclusions — in particular, focusing upon the tail - end analysis of Marcott et al as a weak shibboleth for non-rational climate - change skepticism — amount to disgraceful demagogic denialism - via - quibbling, isn't that correct?

If that summary is correct, I would think, that to continue these analyses in a meaningful way and assuming that the details of the more recent RCS algorithms will not be forthcoming, why not use a consensus (amongst our statistical minded participants here) best approach growth algorithm and see what kind of Yamal series results and how well it performs through sensitivity testing.

We can see this more clearly by plotting just the corrected data (black lines are a piecewise - linear fit by change - point analysis):

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787family/programfacts.html I think that makes David Young 2 % correct: — RRB - More generally, of course any strong scientific research program is going to combine observational analysis with theoretical / modelling work.

If this analysis is correct then the issue simply can not be solved with more science (but more science we shall have).

When this is corrected, and the warming retreats and becomes ever more localised, this not only destroys / significantly reduces the level of plausibility, it's an obvious «dig here» for further clarification on why it appears to be localised — whether that's looking carefully at the quality of the underlying data — as opposed to it's analysis — or looking at localised physical phenomena.

I have written a number of times about climate science and post-modernism, where taking the politically correct position and pushing for the «right» government actions is more important than fact - based analysis or the scientific method.

My analysis on that point was, though, premised on principles of administrative law — my claim was that the Court was correct to hold that the Law... [more]

Is one judge's legal analysis necessarily more «correct» than the other?