Sentences with phrase «more custodial time»

If you are not currently enjoying at least 50/50 custody, we may be able to assist you in obtaining more custodial time.

When parents divorce or break up, the noncustodial parent (the one with less parenting time) usually pays child support to the custodial parent (the parent with more custodial time) based on the parents» respective incomes.

Not exact matches

Even if you share a generous visitation schedule with your ex, it's likely that you spend more time with your kids than your ex does, simply by virtue of being the custodial parent.

It gives the noncustodial parent more time with the baby, while also giving the custodial parent time to catch on some (probably much - needed) sleep.

Custodial parents, after all, are the ones who set more rules, make kids do homework and get to bed on time.

Generally speaking, trusts are more expensive, complicated and time - consuming than custodial accounts.

Oftentimes when people say the custodial parent they are talking about the parent who has the house where the children spend more time than they do with the other parent.

Similarly, during the summer period when the children are with the custodial parent for more than two (2) consecutive weeks, the non-custodial parent's regular parenting time continues, which includes alternating weekends and mid-week parenting time, unless impracticable because of distance created by out of town vacations.

If longer sentences are intended to give offenders more time in custody to facilitate their eventual rehabilitation, one would expect that government would include corresponding additional resources to staff - up custodial rehabilitation programs for all these offenders who will now be serving longer sentences but no such commitment has been made.

The custodial parent who is set to spend more time with the kids generally receives child support because they will spend more money on childcare.

I've been employed at the Gold Rim Hotel as a part - time janitor for more than 2 years, where I have efficiently coordinated, planned, and implemented all functions and activities of the custodial department.

In California, the parent who is seen to be most likely to encourage «frequent and continuing» contact with your child (ren) will be the parent who is considered to be more suitable to be the primary custodial parent (i.e. have more than 50 % parenting time).

If the non-custodial parent is admitted to a hospital or residential treatment facility for a period of more than two days for reason other then pregnancy or childbirth, then the non-custodial parent shall immediately notify the custodial parent, and the custodial parent may pick the children up any time thereafter, even though the non-custodial parent has not enjoyed full seven - week summer visitation;

In addition, the utterly unsupported implication that granting nonresidential fathers shared parenting rights, more visitation time, or custodial authority will correct these outcomes is ridiculous.

If a child is to be with one parent significantly more of the time than with the other parent (for example, when the two parents live a considerable distance from one another), I suggest replacing the traditional term of «custodial parent» with the less emotionally charged concept of «the child's primary residence» and «the child's secondary residence.»

Because the percentage of custodial time would be a factor in calculating child support, parents might become more vigorous in custody litigation because of the potential economic impact.

In joint physical custody situations, the child usually spends marginally more time with one parent, referred to as the «primary custodial parent.»

The noncustodial parent may also believe that the move would benefit the child to such a degree that he should have more parenting time and become the custodial parent.

The custodial parent has the undeniable advantage of being the decision maker, whereas the non custodial parent has the advantage of more free time.

Provided the custodial parent is relocating in good faith, for legitimate purposes — such as remarriage, availing herself of more family support, or a substantial employment opportunity — and not for the sole purpose of denying parenting time to the non-custodial parent, the court generally permits relocation.

A parent that has the child more than 50 % of the time is considered the primary custodial parent and the other parent is considered the non-custodial parent.

Just the very act of initiating a divorce can drive a wedge in the parent - child relationship, and that wedge can grow as the child spends more time away from his or her custodial parent.

The primary custodial parent is the one who cares for the children more than 50 percent of the time, while the parent with visitation rights is the one who cares for the children less than 50 percent of the time.

«If there is one custodial parent (in most jurisdictions, this means that the children reside with this parent more than 60 % of the time; ask a family law lawyer about the definition of sole physical custody in your area), then the state or provincial Child Support Guidelines set out the base level of child support payable for one or more children.»

For children between ages 5 and 7, who understand the concept of «the day after tomorrow,» they are not separated from the custodial parent for more time than they can conceptualize.

Assuming the noncustodial parent has parenting time, a custodial parent can't move out of state with the children — or even more than 100 miles within the state — without giving him 60 days notice first.

Using these provisions, a parent who has the child for half of the time each year could agree to waive the exemption in alternating years, and the parent who has the child for more than half of the year could agree to waive the exemption every few years in proportion to the other parent's significant custodial responsibilities.