Sentences with phrase «more danger do»

Not exact matches

To make employees more comfortable about being monitored, make sure that your attention doesn't pose any danger to their autonomy — and make them aware of this.

As long as you keep your mind sharp, Fernandez doesn't see danger in relying more on Google for hard facts.

Though you may need more guidelines and procedures as your company grows, you don't want to stymie creativity or lose your appeal to top talent, which are real dangers of overly corporate cultures.

«We can probably afford to do things more like Box without getting into any danger.

If you wanted to be a contrarian — and you ran a TV network that didn't have sports — you could argue that ESPN was in more danger than it looked, because most people didn't really want to pay for it — they just had to pay for it.

Quite a few are going the way of Greece, quite a few more are in danger of doing so and quite a few of those that so far aren't are scrambling to avoid it by cutting back on social spending before there is a default crisis.

Our cause is never more in danger, than when a human, no longer desiring, but intending, to do our Enemy's will, looks round upon a universe from which every trace of Him seems to have vanished, and asks why he has been forsaken, and still obeys.

Terrorists certainly tempt us to abandon our moral beliefs, and every sensible person knows something more needs to be done to fight ISIS and the growing danger of global jihadism.

In fact, Jesus had more to say about the the dangers of greed, love of possessions, and the lack of compassion for the the «poor» and the «least of these» than he did about any other single subject in christian scripture.

The danger of believing that there is something more after death, an after - life for the soul is that you will put off being the best that you can be now in hopes of avoiding expending some effort and sliding in under the wire to a Heaven which no one can prove exists or does not exist.

Making any more drastic change in their position than they did would have put them in clear danger of violating the requirements.

The idea here is exactly what Paul says in Romans 8:31 - 39: God's power does not remove us from persecution, danger, difficulty, sickness and death, but makes us more than conquerors in and through all such things.

In a global conversation about danger, fear and Syrian refugees, we're seeing a resurgence of the countercultural practice of loving people we don't think are like us — and in extending Gospel - saturated love to them, we realize we are far more similar in our human needs.

Think you are wisely right to have your concerns but let me Guide you to ask which branches of Islam handles each mosque you know of and find out more about their mentality and they call for since not all branches of Islam are of danger, but you mentioned some thing which make me feel that there is a possibility that you got the most redial branch of all Islam branches... This branch is taking advantage of the presence of non harming Muslims to expand it's redical teachings by offerings or force turning Islamic communities from normal to most redical of all... do not favor to give the name of that branch but sure you will find it if you look for it...

I see many more «dangers» with organized religions than I do with people being spiritual.

It's a danger to young people not to know what they believe and why they believe it, because they are much more sensitive to the accusation of hypocrisy that «you are in a Church, and you don't understand what it believes».

If this were done, then the inevitable danger which every dogmatician must, confront [and here lies the dignity and greatness of his task] would be more clearly recognized: namely, the danger that he may not remain upon an extension of the biblical line, but rather interpret the biblical texts primarily ex post facto, from the point of view of his «going beyond the New Testament.

This finding does not imply that the theology or conviction of the leader or congregation is of no consequence; «rather, it is to say that the conviction, enthusiasm, warmth and competence with which the Christian faith and life are shared communicate more effectively» One of the report's conclusions is that, the dangers of «clericalism» notwithstanding, it is absolutely necessary to upgrade the quality of professional leadership if the churches are to grow and if the expectations of the laity are to be met.

If these «Christians» actually read the bible itself, they would realize that the last thing that Christ himself (who was not some kind of a testosterone hoped up person) would have done was to have placed young people (who he actually called the essence of heaven itself) in more danger than was absolutely necessary.

I see «sectarian catholicity» as more fraught with danger than does he.

If they do exist, I would expect that what I have seen as the greatest dangers in sectarian education would be less likely to be exemplified, and the best possibilities more often realized.

The more immediate danger is that many needy people will go unserved if we assume that most congregations are doing or could do something that they can not.

Now that the Players Association and the media are doing more to expose the dangers of CTE, Nowinski is beginning to see an impact within the league.

Wilshere should have been brought in to create and add danger, speed to our game, Walcot some more and Giroud if needed... Ozil being supposed to sit apparently... So, it is no referee, but a team as reflecting manager... If owners and Wenger himself do not get a huge container of coffee, we will finish 12 and he will be doing the walk of shame, leave himself remembered as a loser... What they need to do NOW is bring Henry to assist him and do the job, boost, get players focused with winning spirit he has in him... Then wenger can sit all season long, bench himself as he does and watch henry do the running and screaming as other manager dio... Then we will be in top 3, meaning third; there's now way to ctach up the Manchesters and if we do nt wake up now, we will fight for fourth place; the spurs will distance us and fight for second or third.

And it happens in more games than it doesn't, with varying degrees of sloppiness / danger.

I noticed him do this at least three times, and every time the resulting attack represented a more real danger to the Newcastle goal than our true attacking players could muster.

With their Swedish centre forward Zlatan Ibrahimovic injured it is likely to be the young English striker leading the line at Old Trafford on Saturday, so is he the main danger man and does Wenger need to take special care to stop him hurting our title challenge once more?

This is to say I'd probably enjoy more of the plot if it didn't involve mostly white children getting out of danger they caused by being mostly white children.

what is undisputably true is that we created no other clear cut chances in the game... even giroud and alexis were half chances... equally true is that walcott made zero difference and only when ox appeared did we look more dangerous... for 10 minutes... but also by withdrawing coquelin and potential danger this brough....

What some of us are saying, is that by doing so much and not delegating to others he has dropped the ball very badly on occasion's, and that those occasions have become more and more often until now when they have put the progress of the team in danger.

He should be doing better no doubt, but IMO he's one of the players who brings more danger to the area, which is good to have.

He said something like «I don't feel pressure to win the title because staying in the champions league when the club was in financial danger was more pressured than winning the title».

«We could've done more, but we didn't play as a team, so every time they attacked, it was a danger.

All he needed to do was to get Wilshere and Walcot to add speed and danger, replace Elneny or shaka and not Lacazette out but lost Welbeck, add Ozil to create more danger and kill the game as off second half or latest 60th minute, pound on Watford....

Don't take this the wrong way, but women tend to be more in tune with the danger signs of a problem marriage.

Learn more about the warning signs of emotional or physical distress resulting from the dissolution of the family and what parents can do to help address these danger signs.

And while it's unreasonable to expect your ex to do everything «your way,» anything that feels... MORE to you like a potential danger is cause for real concern.

Choking is still a danger, so this more relaxed attitude about feeding babies definitely doesn't extend to food size and consistency.

Whilst most parents do whatever they can to warn their children about the dangers of smoking, there's no denying the... Read More

There are many things that can be done by a parent to avoid putting your child in danger, but certain things, such as installing baby gates on stairs or around pools, plexiglas on banisters, child safety locks and furniture straps, are a bit more complicated to put in place by yourself.

The problem is that though prior studies have indeed linked back sleeping babies with an elevated risk of FHS, there are considerably more benefits and fewer dangers in doing so.

Pacifiers are one more thing that will have to be checked out and monitored to make sure they don't present a danger or need to be replaced.

I do understand the dangers, but I think if done responsibly co sleeping benefits my family more than putting LO in a separate bed.

Read this article to learn more about stranger danger and why the often repeated message (Don't Talk to Strangers) may not be keeping your child safe.

If I try to ignore that I need me - time or, alternately, I try to something that needs to be done but that I'm not in the mood for, like folding clothes or washing dishes, I only get more wound up and that's when I'm in danger of losing it.

Some things kill many more people, some kill many fewer, but we don't ignore the dangers, and we do what we can to lessen the death toll.

Once you get the knack of having a baby that doesn't remain in one place, you can learn more about baby proofing the house and foresee danger before it happens.

The refusal to call Dr. Tuteur «doctor» reveals your implicit acknowledgement that doctors really do know more about the physiology and dangers of birth than midwives do.

In that regard, any ruling party that is powerful of it's own - i.e., has intrinsic power not derived from voters; a power to stick to ruling despite the changing desires of people - is antidemocratic; so a «democracy through strength» is a danger that might (not always, but a possibility) turn into a dictatorship; and a «democracy through weakness» which is unable to do so and needs to re-estabilish it's power (and right to exist) at every single elections is a preferrable system of governance that would pay more attention towards their people, and be better for the people (as opposed to their own nomenclature).

It looks like you have to have a more direct linkage to acts being done by law enforcement placing you or a family member in more danger then would have been.