Citing a phenomenon called «risk compensation» - in which the use of protective equipment is thought to result in behavioral changes, such as the adoption of
more dangerous playing techniques, which can result in a paradoxical increase in injury rates - they also fear that that making helmets mandatory could actually lead to an increase in concussion rates in the sport.
Not exact matches
What's
more, Dick's is
playing a very
dangerous game given how many retailers have learned the hard way how hard it is to get customers weaned off of discounts.
What would have been
dangerous is if all this was
playing out privately in DC, behind the scenes, that would be
more dangerous to us.
Of course, buying expensive risk assets on the view that they're going to become
more expensive is a
dangerous game to
play, but since government funding crises hammer risk assets while printing money inflates them, such funding crises should present decent value opportunities to buy into beaten up assets before the inflation ride.
Dissatisfaction with your current circumstances, feeling obligated to continue school, lack of direction or a desire to spend a few
more years after undergrad on a college campus
playing Xbox until 4 a.m. every day are all
dangerous reasons to consider going back to school.
Equally
dangerous to science, however, if not
more so, are those naturalistic scientists who
play essentially the same game as the creationists, i.e., seek to lend credibility to their particular worldview by attempting to clothe it in scientific garb.
Listen I keep seeing bumper stickers like «you can't be both Catholic and pro-choice» these are not reflective of my faith, theser are slogans made for propaganda, I have 2 beautiful children and I have never been on a position where abortion could even
play a part, but it is a legal option to the public at large; this being said even the bible calls for us to be good citizens, and to obey the law, I believe that this is a matter that belongs with the family and not the state; no matter how we criminalize abortion, they will not stop, but people will go under - ground and
more fatalities will occur, I rather see the government placing incentives on
more conseling for these expectant mothers and
more outreach done at church levels, to reduce the debate to a single slogan is
dangerous and will not accomplish the ultimately goal of preventing abortions my two humble cents
I consider Drogba as
dangerous as Hazard if not
more whenever he
plays against us, he has a good history of scoring goals against us.
«I think he
plays well coming in from the left, but he is much
more dangerous [in the middle].
Today if he
played Jack and Flamini as DM and b2b and had
played Ozil OR Cazorla as 10 and Ox in the wings we would have been much
more dangerous.
I think Ramsey
play better coming off the bench, when ever he's in the starting eleven he rarely scores a goal, he gives the ball away far to often and sometimes in
dangerous positions, he makes straight forward passes or the simple passes, I've never seen him make a defense splitting pass or a through ball, the only positive about him starting a match is his engine, he will definitely cover a lot of ground but i think we need
more of a creative or Attacking CM in that position because of the back three formation.
We
played chelsea and for
more period of the game than us, they had us pinned in around the 18 yard box, and had
more time on the ball in those
dangerous areas than us.
When these guys learn how to
play around him, and really start to gel, they'll be even
more dangerous than they already are.
I hope Lacazette can be
more dangerous by
playing behind him and his connection with the other German speaking players like Mkhitaryan could help Arsenal.
In a time when Formula 1 is looking at improving safety with things like the Halo device, Bernie piped up with the well - timed suggestion that F1 should be made
more dangerous and
play up to the theatre of big accidents.
There would be fewer
dangerous collisions, and
more clever approach
play.
Neville was speaking on Monday Night Football ahead of tonight's Premier League stalemate between Everton and West Bromwich Albion and, according to quotes from the Mail, the former England international also believes that regularly
playing 4 -4-2 would benefit United as it makes them
more dangerous in attack.
Which is why Alabama hangs dumb, false signs up in its locker room, to try and piss off an incredible team into
playing like something even
more dangerous.
We are so much
more fluid, and
dangerous on the break with a speedy CF, the defence to attack motion tends to that extra move, that extra pass with Giroud, which is enough time to slow down our
play, allow the other team to get bodies back.
Wenger said, «Since he's
played through the middle he looks
more goal
dangerous.
«On the power
play he's even
more dangerous,» says the New Jersey Devils» Craig Billington, who watched helplessly as Lemieux scored just such a goal in a 4 - 3 loss to the Penguins on Oct. 24.
It'd make us 10x
dangerous and scary to team......... I hate to think Many teams (even Lower ones) now
play much
more attack than we do
cause even the goal difference isnt such a problem, if we want to go top the would have to lose 2 games and if they lose 2 games the difference in gd would sink atleast to just 3 between us and then if we win the games it would sink to atleast 1 so if we score 2 goals
more than them in the other 6 games of us we would be top, well as long as spurs give up 4 points and i strongly believe that they will lose points, cause they are beatable cause they wont
play like leicester only on the break but would also want to dominate some games and against liverpool / southampton that will be
dangerous
Welbeck speeds our
play up and we look
more dangerous when he is
playing than not»
Wilshere still holding ball too long at times but in part for lack of support but his holding and distribution
play is good and he is getting in to
more dangerous positions... problem is wenger and his endless team rotations until this stops we will underperform
You can get concussions while
playing any sport and while football is one of the
more dangerous ones, its not as though it is the only sport that players suffer head trauma.
I hope we don't try to
play the defensive game because they are
dangerous in and around our box, they were unlucky not to score one or two
more goals in the first leg at Emirates and if they find their confidence with home advantage and their fans getting behind them it could be curtains for us, i don't think they will allow us the same space as they did last week so lets take the game to them early and keep the ball in their half with high possession,
Lacazette always looks
dangerous when he gets the ball, but with the strength and pace of EPL defenders he doesn't get much time on the ball as our opponents have learned his style of
play, but Wenger thinks that he still does enough for the team even though he can't seem to score any
more.
The screen game should still be strong and if Cook / Murray can be as effective as Murray / Jet (which they should be) then
play - action will be even
more dangerous than it was in 2017.
Arsenal are much
more dangerous with three pacey forwards, and Ozil
playing just off them.
Wenger said: «Since he has
played through the middle he looks
more dangerous because he is in full confidence, is physically strong, he likes to take people on as well and he makes perfect runs.»
that means, a right footed player on theleft wing is
more dangerous since he gets
more room to use his right foot to dribble andpass rather than being locked out closer to the touch line where it can only be used tocross.Messi
plays on theright ronaldo
plays more to theleft
Cousins seems far
more dangerous when he's essentially
playing like a wing, either starting at the perimeter, or the high post.
In fact the England midfielder has looked sharper and
more dangerous than Ozil so far, although he has only
played two full games in the League cup and the Europa League so far.
Cazorla is actually
more of a through pass threat than ozil It's just that ozil is bound to
play more dangerous passes.
I just don t get how some here are happy with ramsey
playing as RW.The lad is good, he has heart but he is not a RW.Welbeck and Walcot are and we are
more dangerous when they
play in this position.I fear Wenger will never change and will always try to accomodate his favourites in the team.Today Ozil was useless, replace him by Welbeck and shift Ramsey in the middle, but no it has to be a non favourite Coquelin who bring
more than any of them.I doubt Arsenal will win any PL title with Maureeno in charge of Chelshi as he is quite
more astute on tactic than Wenger.Oh boy, you may always say runner up is not that bad.....
Right from the start Antonio Conte's side looked in charge and
more dangerous and Arsenal set the tone of the game with some sloppy passing, mistakes at the back and a generally slow aspect to our
play.
Personally, I'm one of the Schiano idea truthers, because it's honestly 10x
more exciting than kickoffs and isn't any
more dangerous than any other
play.
In many ways, Mahomes is
more dangerous after the
play breaks down than he is in the pocket.
If Wellbeck
plays on the left and doesn't get injured, we have a new striker like Lacacette in the middle and Mahrez on the right with Ox in right wing back and kolasinac at left wing back we could potentially be
more dangerous in attack than we were last season.
He is a far
more dangerous and useful player than walcott, wilshere, Ox and Ramsay from what is seen i think he is
playing with restraint and was gradually improving in goal scoring and creating chances.
When Wenger moved him to the right wing, where he
played for Barca as well, he became
more dangerous again and less predictable.
Alexis is far
more dangerous when
playing through the middle as his game opens up alot
more compared to
playing in the left.
When we're withstanding heavy pressure of in trouble he
plays a
more protective role, but while we have numbers behind the ball that added organisation affords Coquelin the opportunity to anticipate, take
more risks and win the ball back in
dangerous positions.
Giroud seems to understand this best as he sort of provides a pivot around which forward
play can happen — thus making his team mates
more dangerous.
But after this spirited and impressive homestand, it's clear they are a far
more dangerous club than they were a week ago — and they are
playing like they know it, too.
I would argue that, when you are down to 10 men, Giroud brings
more to the table in every area than a striker like Aguero because, not only is he
dangerous in open
play, he is an asset at set -
plays too.
However, both Mustafi (1.4 successful out of 1.9 per 90) and Koscielny (1.4 out of 1.4 per 90) have a higher percentage than this number i.e. when they
play together, they further reduce the number of
dangerous situations the ball can get into by taking it away
more effectively from the opponents.
Chelsea are passing the ball much
more cleanly, and their switches of
play are faster and
more dangerous.
12 Victor Moses — 6 Was
played more centrally than he might be used too, but still did what was asked and looked
dangerous when he managed to find the ball, and space.