Sentences with phrase «more dividends because»

The latter method could pay more dividends because of your new personal connection.

Not exact matches

Frank Holmes, CEO and chief investment officer with U.S. Global Investors, likes to see dividend payouts because it forces companies to be more prudent with their cash.

Now share buybacks aren't necessarily a bad thing, and in fact are Warren Buffett's preferred method for returning cash to shareholders — as opposed to dividends — because they give management more flexibility.

The other reason why I have Creating Products edging out dividends is because of the much higher POTENTIAL to make a lot more money.

It's actually significantly more risky compared to index investing, because dividend companies are a much smaller share of the total global economy compared to the broader indices.

The less capital a business requires to run, the more attractive it is to an owner because the more money he or she can extract in the form of dividends to enjoy life or reinvest in other projects.

This is because reinvested dividends during crashes and market corrections purchase more cheap shares that will, in the future, generate far higher profits when the market rebounds.

I stick to dividends because my downside is limited and I get paid to wait... I won't elaborate more on my strategy here.

My dividend income is more than my expenses, but only because I have earned a lot of money during the past 10 years with my business.

When the market becomes extremely volatile, high dividend stocks become attractive to many investors because of their more certain payouts.

Dividend stocks are enticing to investors during periods of volatility because in such a market they tend to perform well relative to more growth - oriented or higher - risk equities.

We know that Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway hasn't paid a dividend in more than 30 years because Buffett feels that the return on capital that he generates by retaining those earnings will create eventual share price appreciation value for the shareholder that will exceed the share price / dividend capital appreciation that his shareholders would receive.

@Bluejeansman I take it you are talking about LS20 and (maybe) LS40, because only funds with more than 60 % fixed interest (or cash) assets have their dividends taxed as interest.

SeaDrill has been the steadiest performer this year — undoubtedly because it delivered a massive dividend of more than 8.5 %.

«Dividend cuts would take more from poor people than rich people because rich people would pay less taxes if their dividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska AnDividend cuts would take more from poor people than rich people because rich people would pay less taxes if their dividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska Andividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska Anchorage.

TBH I think Kroenke is our biggest problem, because he simply does not care about Arsenal, as long as he can get rewards from our reserves for «advisory services» or a dividend as it's more commonly known, and he is also going to be the one most difficult to get rid of, as it's very unlikely he'll sell unless someone makes him an offer he can't refuse, he hits financial problems where he'll have to sell, or Arsenal become extremely unprofitable — all of which are extremely unlikely, given that the share price has gone up over 60 % since he bought.

I obviously speak of Jacki Weaver who has more problems to worry about in regards to getting a nomination and now has to content with a 20 - year - old in a big box office hit who's been shoved in the supporting category because they see easier dividends that way and they know they can get away with it because the critics follow them like sheep.

A gateway is an investment that pays dividends in pupil performance and long - term savings as Mark Haddleton found: «We have... recover [ed] the cost of using Schoolcomms and more; I have started to think of it as free, because as well as saving on costly text messaging to parents, (all app messages and longer emails don't cost anything), we also managed to identify many extra Pupil Premium qualifying families through parents taking the in - app test, which has brought quite a sum of money into school»

This does require a few weeks of work at the beginning of the year, but it pays huge dividends for the rest of the year because students require less redirecting and are much more productive.

The lower a payout ratio, the more secure a company's dividend will be in the face of economic shocks because they have more free cash flow that can be used to pay the dividend if earnings drop.

For certain stocks that I know I want to buy more of eventually I want to use the dividends from that stock to buy more because it is the most efficient way of putting those dividends back to work for me (don't pay any commissions to buy more stock).

With passive dividend income comes more options, and while I've said it before at least a dozen times, I'll say it again because it's so true: Options is what this game is all about.

Once you run out of contribution room, equities can go in a non-registered account, because Canadian dividends and capital gains are taxed more favorably.

This is a reason why some people like to hold onto dividend paying stocks, because their stream of income is more stable.

Many quite valuable businesses don't pay dividends at all because they believe they can create more value for the shareholders by reinvesting the money instead of distributing it now.

Companies that pay dividends treat their capital more carefully, because now their equity has an explicit cost.

That is more impressive than it appears because $ 1 in dividend income back in the 1960's had significantly more purchasing power.

But also because I'm now pooling dividends and reinvesting them into more undervalued stocks.

That will be because Happy Time has arrived: You can live off your dividends and not have to work at a job any more unless you want to!

Also, if you drip dividends, some positions will grow faster than others, because they will be receiving more dividend reinvestments.

For example, when you use US dollars to buy a stock sold in euros, and the dollar gains in value against the euro, any dividends the stock pays will convert to fewer dollars because more than one euro is required to equal one dollar.

First - time investors often have a hard time doing this, but because dividend stocks provide a steady payment every quarter or every year, beginners might be more willing to hang onto them.

That's key to your long - term investment success, because those dividends can contribute as much... Read More

KR: Because of the collapse in commodity prices and the associated fall in the profitability of energy and materials companies, investors now depend on financials for more than 50 % of the earnings and nearly half of the dividends on the S&P / TSX Composite Index.

I'm also leery of companies that pay more in dividends than they earn — particularly if this situation persists for a long time — because such firms often cut their dividends.

Statutory accounting is in some ways more critical than GAAP even for stock companies, because that determines how much cash can be distributed to the holding company, which is crucial if the holding company needs to make interest payments, or wants to make dividend payments.

I am not sure specifically about what you are asking and would like to hear on this myself but I don't believe there is any disadvantage per se because I know there are programs that do dividend reinvestment and that results in fractional ownership of a share until it becomes a full share and while only your «whole» shares are «traded» when it comes to actual worth, your fractional count too, so I assume from that if you had «whole» shares no matter what the amount, you'd be proportionally invested as anyone owning more shares, just to a lesser extent.

Dividend increases are better than annual raises because dividend income is taxed more favorably than employmentDividend increases are better than annual raises because dividend income is taxed more favorably than employmentdividend income is taxed more favorably than employment income.

Because their weightings are based on the dollar size of the dividend rather than the yield, the WisdomTree funds will tend to be biased more towards mega caps than the other ETFs.

It is always exciting to post the dividend income results at the end of the quarter because generally, these numbers higher due to more... Continue Reading about Dividend Income Madividend income results at the end of the quarter because generally, these numbers higher due to more... Continue Reading about Dividend Income MaDividend Income March 2018

Ranking the dividend attractiveness of these stocks is a bit more complicated, because there's more things to factor in.

Investing is more than just owning a stock because it pays a dividend.

iShares Canadian Select Dividend's MER is higher than, say, the iShares S&P / TSX 60 Index ETF because it's more actively managed.

Because anything you gain in a TFSA is tax free, it makes sense to put your more aggressive, or higher paying dividend securities in your TFSA.

And all of my choices are dividend funds because if you read my book then you knew that dividend mutual funds are best source of long term regular income read this article for more detail about why I Prefer dividend funds among growth funds

Dividend Income spiked during those months because I have been trying to save more.

If you had bought a dividend - paying stock one day or more before the ex-dividend date, you would have still gotten the dividend (because the shares were trading cum - dividend).

I invest in both, but I prefer stock investing because I have more tools to reduce the potential of losses, I don't have to tie up as much money for long periods of time to make a profit, I can achieve rising cash flow through dividend growth stocks and covered call writing (a low risk option strategy), I can use leverage through margin or options to accelerate my returns, and I don't have to deal with tenants, insurance and building inspectors, and tradesmen.

Dividends can help combat volatility — that's because dividend yield increases as the market price of a stock falls, making the stock more attractive

PS: There is good marks for VHDYX (Vanguard High Dividend Yield) also... this makes me more happy because I have invested in this also.