Languages are dying as improved transport and telecommunications bring different peoples into closer contact, and speakers of minority tongues abandon them for the languages of
more dominant cultures.
Not exact matches
As Todd Brenneman argues in his recent book, Homespun Gospel: The Triumph of Sentimentality in Contemporary American Evangelicalism, sentimentality may be a defining characteristic of religious life for many Americans, and so most readers in the
dominant Evangelical
culture, outside a few hip and urban churches, are
more likely to encounter the treacly poetry of Ruth Bell Graham than the spiritually searing work of R. S. Thomas or T. S. Eliot.
In these last years, scarred by AIDS, by the
dominant culture of greed and violence, and by personal loss and pain, I have come to see
more distinctly the vital link between the healing process (traditionally the prerogative of religious and medical traditions) and the work of liberation (assumed to be the business of revolutionary movements for justice).
In these last years scarred by AIDS, by the
dominant culture of greed and violence, and by personal loss and pain, the author has come to see
more distinctly the vital link between the healing process (traditionally the prerogative of religious and medical traditions) and the work of liberation (assumed to be the business of revolutionary movements for justice).
Just because ours is an establishment
more of content than of form; just because our close ties with our
dominant culture have existed at the level of fundamental beliefs, lifestyles, and rudimentary moral assumptions; any effective extrication of ourselves from this severely limiting relationship has to occur at that
more subtle level: the level of original thought.
Such marriages are found in all segments of our society but may be
more common among minority
cultures where men are almost as dehumanized by the white male
dominant culture as are women.
This once vital tradition was
more effective when Protestant values were
more dominant in American
culture than they are now.
The presentation of how desperate our situation is has already distressed those «conservatives» who want nothing
more than to be the regime's «loyal opposition,» forever offering half - hearted dissent to whatever decadence the
dominant culture foists upon us.
As it has always been, it was a sub-
culture living off the scraps of the
dominant culture (rather than
more rightly being the counter-
culture it was designed to be).
Looking primarily to models based on quantitative research methodologies to provide a clear direction for policy in regulating media and violence can also distract policy makers from coming to grips with other difficult but
more important value questions that impinge on the issue of media and violence, such as the purpose of broadcasting, issues of ownership and control of media, the international context of Australian media, the
dominant economic nature of most of Australia's social communications, the distinctive ways in which the media reproduce and reconstruct myths and symbols of violence from within the
culture, and how audiences use and respond to media myths and symbols.
The immanentist, nonmetaphysical, secularist mind, increasingly
dominant in the broader
culture, is all the
more powerful and insidious because of its insistence that its interpretation of reality is not only the best one but the only one.
The Arab world, where the Arabic language and
culture is
dominant, includes
more than 60,000,000 Muslims.
Although processed cheese is currently
dominant, in part due to the encroachment of Western fast food brands like Pizza Hut and McDonalds, it could be that the marketing of
more artisanal cheese as a symbol of
cultured taste and difference could lead to success.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far
more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of
dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once
dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become
dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that
dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had
more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant
culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win
more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded
more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Though in both
cultures the mother takes on the
dominant care - giver role the Navajo society puts much
more emphasis on the importance of childrearing.
More recently, a report by Kevin N. Laland of the University of St. Andrews in Scotland and his colleagues in Nature Reviews Genetics, building on an earlier proposal by Robert Boyd of the University of California, Los Angeles, and Peter J. Richerson of U.C. Davis, argued that human
culture, defined as any learned behavior, including technology, has been the
dominant natural selection force on modern humans.
In Aotearoa New Zealand, there is official, legal acknowledgement that there is
more than one
dominant culture and that there are competing value systems, an acknowledgement that also exists in some schools.
But some of the markers randomly assigned were given this extraneous information — either a photograph of the student or some educational classification or the sex or ethnic background and the other ones either weren't told this information or were given information about the student who supposedly submitted the work, putting the person in the
more favourite category, which might be the
dominant ethnic background of the
culture, it might be males, or it might be say the student is a gifted student in primary school.
Educators who see their role as adding a second language and cultural affiliation to students» repertoires are likely to empower them
more than those who see their role as replacing or subtracting students» primary language and
culture in the process of fostering their assimilation into the
dominant culture.
Thomas's ongoing artistic consideration of the impact of the
dominant white
culture on individuals and communities of color is
more timely than ever.
Just think of the importance of the Independent Group (IG), composed of writers, artists and critics, who went against the then -
dominant notions of Modern art in order to include
more of popular
culture within the realms of creation.
Hanukkah is a very minor Jewish holiday and commemorates a time,
more than 2,000 years ago in which the Jewish people were at risk of being absorbed into a hostile
dominant culture.
In not wanting to choose, children are being
more sensible than the present
dominant culture that increasingly turns the appropriate involvement and voice of children into their being set up to be the chief witness and decision maker between parents in cases where the parents are not able to protect their children from these terrible and harmful responsibilities.