It is not surprising that Christian theologians should have given
a more dualistic cast to the I - Thou philosophy than Buber has.
Modern theology is far
more dualistic than Medieval or Patristic theology, and these are
more dualistic than the Bible.
Not exact matches
At that time this philosophy was probably no
more than a
dualistic world vision based on the principles of prakriti and purusha (matter and spirit).
It is possible to speculate that if Christianity had begun in a culture less
dualistic and antiphysical than that of the first - century Mediterranean world, it might have been willing, given the
more holistic anthropology and theology of its Hebraic roots, to extend its body metaphor to God?
But he is distinguished by his conscious adoption and pursuit of it, in place of the
more traditional,
dualistic doctrine of inferior and superior realities.
Now the
dualistic sin of the Christian church, its original heresy, is that of resurrecting Jesus into the heavens with God in glory and the designation of the church as Christ's mystical body on earth.15 In actuality this doctrinal pronouncement represents a reversal of God's kenotic movement into humanity in Christ's flesh and in his death, for contrary to the spirit of kenotic incarnation, the church has become ever
more sacredly apart from the profane, and the resurrected Savior ever
more transcendent of the world.
Evangelical theology and practice tended also to be
more clear - cut, almost
dualistic in its concepts.
So far our comments have been largely a contrast of stances toward human existence: a plea for a
more truly dialectical, less
dualistic understanding of the relation between form and energy, a plea for a similar openness toward the past, a question about the future to the effect that the incompleteness of the present ought not to frustrate Dr. Altizer into insisting that the total reversal promised by the glimpsed eschatological future be the only standard or norm of faith.
It is possible to speculate that if Christianity had begun in a time less
dualistic and antiphysical than was first century Mediterranean culture, it might given the
more holistic anthropology and theology of its Hebraic roots, have been willing to extend its body metaphors to God.
Now, on the
dualistic assumption, one can not see
more than two really different sorts of dependence of our mind on our brain: Either
Do you want to try to get away from
dualistic thinking and embrace
more both / and in your life?
But
more refined questions suggest that a sizable number of Americans still express their faith in
dualistic terms.
But once science uncovered the pervasive lifelessness of the physical universe, and pointed out how precariously infinitesimal is the quantity of life and mind, then
more dramatic consequences began to flow from our
dualistic heritage.
As time went on a
more optimistic note became discernible, chiefly in opposition to the false asceticism characteristic of the
dualistic sects.
The
dualistic commons sense assumed that our experience gives us an independently existing material world the mysteries of which were being
more and
more fully understood by scientist.
They describe skilled dialogue as: «An evidence - based approach for transforming difficult conversations; a tool for establishing respectful, reciprocal and responsive interactions between people holding diverse perspectives, whether due to cultural backgrounds, gender, experience, beliefs or other factors, and a framework for breaking out of
dualistic either - or thinking and generating
more inclusive «third» options.»