Sentences with phrase «more dues money»

Smaller classes = more teachers = more dues money.

Teachers unions like having more members on the payroll simply because then the unions can fill their coffers with more dues money.

Not exact matches

Due to the economic downturn of the last few years, many businesses still need to think twice about spending more money than they have to.

Retailers in the U.K. are set to make more money this Christmas — but due to higher prices, not because shoppers are buying more items, according to researchers.

Retailers in the U.K. are set to make more money this Christmas — but due to higher prices, not because shoppers are buying more items.

Without checks and balances in place, you can find yourself saying yes to everything and spending more money than you have — all due to the fear of missing out.

More Money, More Problems Customer satisfaction at online lenders is still pretty low, «in part due to high costs,» Mills and McCarthy write.

The money will go to «initiatives with proven leadership and results that are poised to scale even further» and will be awarded based on more than a year's worth of due diligence and field research.

«It's not so much about the funds, the Europeans have enough money to lend to Greece,» an official close to the bailout talks, who asked to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of negotiations, told CNBC earlier this week, adding that the issue is more of credibility.

This is expected to be increased in size by $ 500 million to $ 750 million due to strong demand, with the extra money to be used to downsize some of the more expensive tranches of the remaining $ 33 billion in financing, the people added.

White said that more small, retail investors are now able to put money into startups due to recent changes in the law and that the SEC is closely monitoring new crowdfunding portals where those investors buy stakes in companies.

Because there's much more money out there than there are good deals, some venture firms these days throw down a term sheet almost right away, seeking to lock up a deal for 30 days of due diligence, James explains.

According to a 2007 Florida State University study, 40 % of employees leave their jobs due to «bad bosses,» not the desire to switch industries, grow in their careers, or earn more money.

Facebook has to make more money due to the growing shareholder expectations and the competition for users» attention will further increase.

The money is expensive — often costing up to 30 percent or more of the original advance due to the high degree of risk.

Puerto Rico's power authority, which supplies electricity to the island's 3.6 million people, made a $ 415 million debt payment that was due Wednesday after reaching a deal with its bond insurers to borrow more money.

-LSB-...] income will improve to roughly $ 30,000 from $ 19,876 mainly due to an investment in a new Venture Debt fund, slight growth in my severance negotiation book sales, investing more money into P2P lending with -LSB-...]

This is due to the fact that in futures, and short option trading, it is possible to lose more money than is deposited in the account.

Moving money from a traditional retirement account to a Roth IRA can be a smart move, but sometimes it backfires due to a change in personal circumstances or, more often, investment losses in the converted account.

You'll pay more in the long run due to interest, but if you're disciplined and invest the money you're not putting toward your loans, that could allow you to build up a higher net worth over the years.

Other income will improve to roughly $ 30,000 from $ 19,876 mainly due to an investment in a new Venture Debt fund, slight growth in my severance negotiation book sales, investing more money into P2P lending with Prosper as well as my Motif Investing fund.

Due to potentially - large oscillations in the desire to hold cash and to the fact that changes in the money supply can take years to impact the cost of living, this theoretical rate of purchasing - power change will tend to be inaccurate over periods of two years or less but should approximate the actual rate of purchasing - power change over periods of five years or more.

«More families that have elderly heads are placing themselves at risk of running short of money in retirement due to their increased likelihood of holding debt while in retirement,» he concludes.

More than ever, investors that want to make money in the stock market need to do their due diligence and find companies with strong economic profits and cheap valuations.

More cash in the bag would help the Silicon Valley venture capital giant diversify its focus from early - and growth - stage investments to pre-IPO funding rounds, at a time when startup valuations are spiking partly due to money pouring in from SoftBank Group Corp's $ 93 billion Vision Fund.

In general, the longer these funds are held, the more money is lost due to rebalancing.

It loads down economies with debt — and when debt service exceeds the surplus out of which to pay it, the central bank tries to «inflate its way out of debt» by creating enough new credit («money») to make real estate, stocks and bonds worth more — enough for debtors to borrow the interest due.

Unlike its nearest competitor, the SEP - IRA, the sometimes dubbed «Self - Employed 401 (k)» makes it possible to put aside quite a bit more money every twelve months due to the way the contribution limits and matching are calculated.

The abnormalities of atheistic beliefs are in today's timelines littering profusely many cherished religious societies whose fundamentalisms have been a social consistency for many good years... Even though I am distasteful of today's religions in that they are usurping the least wealthy, I see their mismanaging of financial dexterities due each religion's hierarchies needing more money for themselves than for their communal poor folks...

Wenger has explained that his lack of spending is due more to supply and demand than an unwillingness to spend: «It is not a shortage of money, just a shortage of players», adding that there was «not quality» in the transfer market.

If he scores a hat - trick the deal could also come under question, with his host club possibly asking for more money, or even refusing to allow him to leave due to his importance.

thrown all their money at a Miles / Tucker backup wing combo (I realize Tucker may not have been gettable due to his CP3 relationship), that's a deeper, more flexible team than they have now with more shooting and defense.

United understand that they will have to pay more for Vertonghen due to being another Premier League club, but they have successfully raided the north Londoners in the recent past, signing Dimitar Berbatov from them in a big - money deal in 2008.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Where he stands to make more money in LA is if he feels like endorsements will give him an additional boost due to market size.

If we invest the more our stock rises, the more we challenge for trophies, the more other class players would be desperate to join us and the more money we will start accumulating due to bigger commercial deals etc...

A) the new players aren't good enough to be better than the sum of their parts and MP isn't able to overcome lack of talent on scheme alone, tanking the season; or B) The Lions are victims of their own success, where the cheap bit players that MP has schemed in find more money elsewhere due to improved stats, and we're stuck playing roulette on cheap, short - term guys again.

If you are thinking of Juventus buying Alexis for more than 35 million euros rather Man city you are wrong and at the most Juve will provide 25 million for him due to his age and Wenger is more like money maker and will sell it Man city but will never take one from them.

Out of this he should spend that Lacazette money on Lukaku or Morata or Aubameyang.Morata is a player who I feel should he be given a team where he's the main man he's going to score a lot of goals.There's more to come from him.I think he'll do well here.It's a shame he usually warms the bench at Madrid.It makes him seem overrated but he's not.Lukaku has the height, physique, quality, speed, power, technique and finishing that Arsenal need in a striker.He looks like that kind of player who'll bang in a lot of goalsif given the chance in a top team.Aubameyang is very very fast and clinical and at his age he's at his best.If we sign him it's more likely he'll be here for a while than most of the two due to his age.

I know wenger has been criticised for not signing more players last summer, however we know that money was not available from current expenditure in the summer due to deferred payments in existing players contracts (payments to their old clubs).

I live in the States and was so giddy when I heard Arsenal was coming this year, especially due to the fact that we started our business early (with hope that many more good signings would follow), however, after realizing that this was a redo of 2015 transfer period, I decided to keep my money, I haven't even purchased my jersey and will not buy another until Wenger leaves.

With all my due respect, WENGER has a dogmatic vision of economics.When you invest more money you have further chances of success in the pitch and, therefore, you get rewarded off the pitch.The owners of Chelsea City etc are not stupid....

Its overall efforts are not that successful due to a lack luster marketing campaign to raise more money, more consistently from a larger pool.

more importantly i see Kronkie is re locating on of his american football clubs due to it not making enough money, even after saying he would never do this???.

If you also said that this is due how teams have access to money, and that with Chelsea they «owe» the owner a 1B, then it would have made more sense.

Alot of people are talking about Barkley, but I would bet money that if we stay at # 4, guys like Bradley Chubb or Denzel Ward are far more likely, in fact I would take Ward due to my preference that you spread around what positions you take with your first rounders - my thinking is that in 5 years we would be saying goodbye to either Garrett or Chubb because of cap concerns.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

We could have more money if Gazidis had done better over the years with sponsorships, Gazidis has been around for nearly a decade now... We have lost sponsorships due to contracts running out.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

However, if it was to adopt the same method of approach other nations do, then the top Premier League clubs would be entitled to more money due to the level of audience they attract.