Even if, by some miracle, some such policy were to come to pass, the long - term necessity for us to accept a lower overall standard of living, especially when that will require far
more economic equality (perhaps including the confiscation of giant fortunes) and far less economic «freedom» (virtual destruction of the «free trade» system, a great deal more regulation of both financial markets and manufacturing industries).
This movement is trying to get
more economic equality.
Not exact matches
The Liberal government has signalled that next Tuesday's budget will include initiatives to promote gender
equality, improve the
economic success of women, ensure
more gender
equality in boardrooms and ease access to capital for female entrepreneurs.
«It's even
more important that Uber build a company that reflects the multi-racial, multi-cultural character of Oakland and the East Bay community, and its tradition of advocating for racial
equality and
economic justice.»
The economy is
more efficient and prosperous when
economic resources are better distributed among the people - not
equality of income, but
equality of opportunity based on moderate levels of inequality (as we had during the Keynesian era.)
Elite opinion among a younger, left - leaning cohort favors
economic efficiency over
equality, and they're
more inclined to be selfish than fair - minded when compared to the population at large.
As for
economic equality, that is an issue that appears to generate
more concern among the party's liberal intellectual elite than among its rank - and - file.
And
more modest
economic performance could be accepted with equanimity if social
equality or environmental quality were enhanced.
We can't become «all about»
economic equality but we can care
more about the lives of the people around us and reclaim the value Jesus placed on feeding, clothing, visiting and inviting in.
Grantly Dick - Read, the father of the natural childbirth philosophy, was a eugenicist who was quite honest about his goal of convincing women of the «better classes» to have
more children and give up those pesky demands for political and
economic equality.
This presents a challenge for those who want to see employee ownership as a
more widespread ownership model, or who see it as an ownership model that promotes greater social solidarity and
economic equality.
For instance, 40 % quotas on all electoral lists, harsher punishments for men in cases of domestic violence, special judicial and
economic assistance for women who are victims of gender violence, a requirement for corporations with
more than 250 employees to have their own
equality plan aimed at eliminating discrimination against women, etc..
Or, to put it in a different way, principles of fairness and
equality can not only be reached, or understood, through an
economic prism, but are rather much
more nuanced than this.
Of course there are many different ways of defining freedom and
equality, and in a sense the schools of choice movement can be said to promote
equality: those with few choices because of their poor
economic position will be less constrained by
economic circumstances and thus become
more «equal» to others.
So perhaps some low - transmission, high -
economic -
equality cities such as Salt Lake City and Los Angeles simply have better,
more equal school systems that produce better and
more equal educational outcomes and thus
more equal incomes as adults.
The forms and methods of feminist art have since broadened and reflect a
more globally informed perspective that still retain the goals of social,
economic, and political
equality.
It further occurred to me that family breakdown would be far easier to manage if: people were less devoted to the idea that romantic relationships are permanent and either monogamous diamorous, and approached separation with
more equanimity; monogamous or diamorous relationships were entered into with the same degree of contemplation and intentionality as polyamorous relationships; imbalances of power, knowledge and resources were less tolerated; and, women's formal
equality were accompanied by substantive political, social and
economic equality.
A shorter workweek would help to improve social and
economic equality and help redistribute the time worked (and, hopefully, the wealth)
more evenly across the nation of the working population.