No one dismisses the importance of developing
more effective teacher evaluation efforts, but the convoluted and complex system being developed by Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor will have a massive impact on how local schools function.
«Applying more pressure on unions and local districts to finally implement
a more effective teacher evaluation system is a wise move by Governor Cuomo,...
«Applying more pressure on unions and local districts to finally implement
a more effective teacher evaluation system is a wise move by Governor Cuomo, especially with nearly $ 1 billion in much - needed state aid and federal Race to the Top dollars now at stake.
The end goal is to use the information to guide in the creation of
more effective teacher evaluation systems that incorporate high - quality multiple measures.
A parent from East New York commented on the need for
a more effective teacher evaluation system:
Not exact matches
He talks about
more rigorous standards and
evaluations for
teachers and students, even while the charter schools he champions function without any
effective oversight.
The issue raised by the release of value - added information is simply how quickly and how assuredly we get to a
more rational system of
evaluations — for both
teachers and administrators — and to a
more rational personnel system that guarantees an
effective teacher in every classroom.
For example, some studies have found that less -
effective early - career
teachers are
more likely to exit than
more -
effective novice
teachers, even in the absence of high - stakes
evaluations.
A report from the nonprofit TNTP found that
evaluations are often neither
effective (
more than 98 % of
teachers are deemed «satisfactory») nor instructive (three out of four evaluated
teachers never received feedback to help them improve their practice).
The new
evaluation systems have forced principals to prioritize classrooms over cafeterias and custodians (and have exposed how poorly prepared many principals are to be instructional leaders) and they have sparked conversations about
effective teaching that often simply didn't happen in the past in many schools — developments that
teachers say makes their work
more appealing.
Peer review also seems to be
more effective than administrative
evaluation in the remediation or removal of veteran
teachers with serious performance problems.
Several studies, including our own, clearly demonstrate that
teacher evaluation systems that are based on a number of components, such as classroom observation scores and test - score gains, are already much
more effective at predicting future
teacher performance than paper credentials and years of experience.
At the same time, the system needs better career ladders for
teachers and far
more effective approaches to selection, mentoring, and
evaluation in order to enlist such talent productively.
We find that
teachers are
more effective at raising student achievement during the school year when they are being evaluated than they were previously, and even
more effective in the years after
evaluation.
Third, the
evaluation process could create
more opportunities for conversations with other
teachers and administrators about
effective practices.
In a debate between Kati Haycock and Eric Hanushek on how to ensure that
more students have
effective teachers, the two agreed about the importance of designing good
teacher evaluation systems.
You adapt your teaching based on your
evaluation of their work and thus become a
more effective teacher.
We are focused on making things better — via stronger standards (Common Core), greater parental choice (vouchers, charters, and
more),
more effective teachers (upgrading preparation programs, devising new
evaluation regimens) and lots else.
In addition, the lawsuit said SED imposed rules for Student Learning Objectives and implemented
evaluations in a way that made it
more difficult for
teachers of economically disadvantaged students to achieve a score of «
effective» or better.
The Measures of
Effective Teaching (MET) project was designed to find out how evaluation methods could best be used to tell teachers more about the skills that make them most effective and to help districts identify and develop great
Effective Teaching (MET) project was designed to find out how
evaluation methods could best be used to tell
teachers more about the skills that make them most
effective and to help districts identify and develop great
effective and to help districts identify and develop great teaching.
The retention results suggest that
teachers who are rated
more effective under the new
teacher evaluation system are retained at higher rates than
teachers who receive lower ratings.
by Tom Kane, Amy Wooten, John Tyler, and Eric Taylor This study of Cincinnati's
teacher evaluation system finds that the
teachers who receive high ratings from trained evaluators who observe them are also
more effective at promoting gains in student test scores.
The plan, which is due to the USED by June 1, will also address recruitment, placement, professional learning,
evaluations and career pathways aimed at keeping
effective and exemplary
teachers in the classroom while giving them
more responsibility.
Her IMPACT
teacher evaluation system gives
teachers the chance to improve, and that is what is happening with
more than 700 D.C.
teachers judged «minimally
effective» on last year's IMPACT
evaluations.
Well, we might get
more consistent
teacher evaluation scores, but we'd get basically no improvement in the identification of
effective teachers.
Collectively, the studies show that despite states» efforts to make
evaluations tougher, principals continue to rate nearly all
teachers as «
effective,» and when principals are asked their opinions of
teachers in confidence, with no stakes attached, they are much
more likely to give harsh ratings.
Through its flexible guidelines, the department has put forward a
more balanced approach that is the new norm for
teacher evaluation: Student learning is a critical component of
teachers» work, but their test scores should be one of many aspects when measuring
effective teaching.
By forming NYCEDF,
MORE and its allies intend to increase grassroots support for a fair contract and to organize
effective opposition to the new
teacher evaluation system imposed on city
teachers by State Education Commissioner John King and the high - stakes testing regime that has been so detrimental to the City's public schools and students.
The new
evaluations roiled the city; 80 percent of D.C.
teachers believe it was not an «
effective way to evaluate the performance» of
teachers, according to a 2010 survey of
more than 900
teachers by the local
teachers union.
After conducting voluntary
evaluations of their classes, students provided coaching and training opportunities for
teachers to become
more effective in their classrooms.
In his State of the State speech in January, he derided the state's
evaluation system as «baloney,» because even though only about a third of students were reading or doing math at grade level, as measured by state tests,
more than 95 percent of
teachers were rated
effective.
In Washington, D.C., one of the first places in the country to use value - added
teacher ratings to fire
teachers,
teacher - union president Nathan Saunders likes to point to the following statistic as proof that the ratings are flawed: Ward 8, one of the poorest areas of the city, has only five percent of the
teachers defined as
effective under the new
evaluation system known as IMPACT, but
more than a quarter of the ineffective ones.
This
more established charter organization was also a strong proponent of merit - pay and changed its compensation to include formal
evaluations and student surveys, as a means of retaining the most
effective teachers and compensating them for their work.
What is promising is that new
teacher -
evaluation systems, if properly designed and implemented, open avenues for targeted and
more -
effective professional - learning opportunities.
Teachers are
more - likely to base their
evaluation of peers on their own subjective biases, giving thumbs up to those who fit their view of what teaching should be than on whether they are actually
effective in improving student achievement.
Armed with the report's findings that
evaluation systems largely failed to distinguish among
effective and non-
effective teachers, education reformers urged introduction of
more objectivity into
teacher evaluation in the form of student performance on state standardized tests.
More than three dozen
teachers,» including many who [had] just been rated «highly
effective» by the New Mexico Public Education Department, working in the Albuquerque Public School District — the largest public school district in the state of New Mexico — turned to a burning bin this week, tossing their state - developed
teacher evaluations into the fire in protest in front of district headquarters.
To promote cultures of continuous growth, schools and school districts should encourage and support feedback loops, honest coaching conversations, and collaboration toward improved student outcomes.59 A recent report found that when
teachers are
more open to feedback, their
evaluation scores are
more likely to increase over time.60 Furthermore, the introduction of new
teacher evaluation systems in recent years has created an opportunity to provide
teachers with much
more effective feedback and to
more intentionally target professional learning to individual
teachers» needs.61 When professional learning is rooted in collaboration and meaningful opportunities to apply new skills, these systems can become essential components of
evaluation systems that support
teacher growth.62
The
teachers on the left side of the bell curve (see below) were
more accurately identified this year, and the
teachers on the «right» side became
more effective due to the new and improved
teacher evaluation system constructed by the state... and what might be renamed the Hogwarts Department of Education, led by Hanna Skandera — the state's Voldemort — who, in this article pointed out that these results evidence (and I use that term loosely) «that the system is doing a better job of pointing out good
teachers.»
Second, thanks to the leadership of many in you this chamber, in 2010, Connecticut adopted a much stronger,
more sensible and
effective teacher evaluation process.
The question is that once we have
effective teacher evaluations systems in place,
teachers who don't make the grade need to be released so we can get a better,
more dedicated and
more capable
teacher into the classroom.
Will the addition of
more tests in a
teacher's
evaluation help us measure whether a
teacher is
effective?
But instead of leaving
teacher effectiveness completely up to local educators, its Encouraging Innovation and
Effective Teachers Act (PDF) surprisingly requires states and districts to develop teacher evaluation systems that use multiple measures of evaluation; incorporate student achievement data; include more than two rating categories; are tied to personnel decisions; and are developed with input from parents, teachers, and othe
Teachers Act (PDF) surprisingly requires states and districts to develop
teacher evaluation systems that use multiple measures of
evaluation; incorporate student achievement data; include
more than two rating categories; are tied to personnel decisions; and are developed with input from parents,
teachers, and othe
teachers, and other staff.
More than a quarter of
teachers who were reviewed in a two - year pilot program of the state's new
evaluation system were rated only «partially
effective» or worse in one part of the new system, according to a new report.
An
effective evaluation system, which would include recognition of
teachers who contribute greatly to the school and... Read
More
The law does continue a separate, competitive funding program, the
Teacher and School Leader Incentive Fund, to allow states, school districts, or non-profits or for - profits in partnership with a state or school district to apply for competitive grants to implement teacher evaluation systems to see if the country can learn more about effective and fair ways of linking student performance to teacher perfo
Teacher and School Leader Incentive Fund, to allow states, school districts, or non-profits or for - profits in partnership with a state or school district to apply for competitive grants to implement
teacher evaluation systems to see if the country can learn more about effective and fair ways of linking student performance to teacher perfo
teacher evaluation systems to see if the country can learn
more about
effective and fair ways of linking student performance to
teacher perfo
teacher performance.
If they can institute their plan
more cost effectively, negating the effects of an unfunded state mandate, and it is accepted as an
effective evaluation of
teacher performance by their Bd of Ed, admins, and
teachers, then where is the argument?