In his 1999 paper Determinants of Democracy, Harvard macroeconomist Robert Barro finds a significant relationship between
more equal educational opportunity between the sexes and the «target» level of democracy (for which elections serve as a proxy).
Not exact matches
«The results suggest that we should expect that women demonstrate relative strength in particular cognitive functions while men in others, even in societies with higher living conditions and
more gender
equal educational opportunities,» explains Weber.
Or would «
equal educational opportunity» require even
more unequal spending, as Professors Ogletree and Robinson argue in their companion essay?
But even if Rodriguez had been wrongly decided, defining a federal right to education in a way that guarantees «
equal educational opportunity» would be no easy task and would raise
more questions than it answered.
This set him apart from his
more - liberal colleagues, who viewed Brown v. Board of Education (1954) not as a prohibition on the use of racial classifications in education, but rather as a mandate for judges to do whatever they could to promote «
equal educational opportunity.»
Although the word «education» appears nowhere in the federal Constitution, advocates for recognizing that such a right is implied typically argue that it would ensure «
equal educational opportunity» and foster
more effective participation in civil society.
Vastly
more jarring is that the central goal of the report — the development of an education system that provides
equal educational opportunity for all groups, and especially for racial minorities — has not been attained.
More generally, I would say that our single biggest national sin of omission is our continued failure to provide our most vulnerable children, often poor and students of color, truly
equal educational opportunities.
«The continued commitment of the federal government to
equal educational opportunity is
more important than ever as states and LEAs face historic budget shortfalls for the foreseeable future,» the group wrote.
More than 50 years after the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education, the nation's public school system has yet to fulfill its promise of
equal educational opportunity for all.
Those disequalizing factors need to be revised or eliminated in order to make schools
more uniform and enable all districts to provide an
equal educational opportunity.
By expanding school choice and providing
more educational opportunities for every American family, we can help make sure that every child has an
equal shot at achieving the American Dream.
In 1996, the Supreme Court determined that racial isolation in Hartford was depriving students of
equal educational opportunities (Sheff v. O'Neill), ultimately leading the state to build
more magnet schools in Hartford.
That's why the fight for
equal educational opportunity is about so much
more than education — it is a fight for social justice.
So how is Connecticut identifying low - income students and making sure they have the resources they need for
educational opportunities equal to those of their
more affluent peers?
More than 50 years after the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed school segregation in Brown v. Board of Education, the nation's schools are still plagued by inequalities, yet the High Court today declines to intervene on behalf of
equal educational opportunity for all children.