By playing with the spectator's expectations of catharsis, it forces them to respond both emotionally and intellectually and to take
a more ethical position in relation to the film by rationally contemplating their emotional response.
Not exact matches
At the same time as the focus of much interfaith activity has become
more practical, those in
positions of leadership in the political and economic spheres are both recognizing the importance of religion in shaping the modern world and acknowledging that there is a spiritual and
ethical dimension to the major problems facing humankind.
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care,
ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial
position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a
more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
As transhumanism becomes
more prevalent, as the sexual revolution identifies
more perversions as «rights,» as technocracy overtakes
ethical reasoning and truth is
more frequently confused with power, believers will find themselves ever
more frequently in the
position of explaining that some realities are not contingent on the prevailing ethos of culture, or on our judgments, or on the fleeting whims of self - definition.
In times when other forces determine the interpretations of events, nature, human life and what have you,
more than religious ones do, it is, in my view, a temptation to find philosophical, theological and
ethical positions that can disengage Christians from intentional interactions with alternatives.
The real and unacceptable extremism occurs when an
ethical position is based on incorrect facts and drastic, potentially
more damaging, action is demanded.
More importantly, even on matters about which there are legitimate differences about what ethics requires, there appears to be
ethical agreement that the
position of some nations are ethically bankrupt despite disagreement about what ethics requires.
The protagonists at every stage will claim that theirs is the
ethical, or
more ethical,
position, and for a number of reasons.
That being said, most trusted advisors get to those
positions of trust with their clients precisely because they have successfully guided said clients throught the morass of legal /
ethical / moral / financial minefields repeatedly over time... these clients don't really care any
more about the nuts and bolts of the transactions, just so long as things go their ways.