Not exact matches
In contrast, the system of sulfuric acid and dimethylamine forms particles much
more efficiently
because even the smallest clusters are essentially stable against
evaporation.
When droughts do occur, they will be
more intense than those in the past,
because higher temperatures will lead to
more evaporation from soils and transpiration from plants.
So in this sense, the 2002 drought and associated heat waves were
more extreme than the earlier droughts,
because the impact of the low rainfall was exacerbated by high potential
evaporation (Karoly et al., 2003; Nicholls, 2004).
For example, even though the volcanic effect is short - lived it will still have an impact on the water cycle - less
evaporation because it's cooler therefore less water vapour, lowering temperature a bit
more.
For one thing, there is
more very heavy rain
because there's
more evaporation.
With the Earth known as the «water planet»
because of over 70 % of the globe covered by deep oceans, warmer temps directly result in
more evaporation of the ocean water into the air - clouds.
The lack of» water vapor» is,
because: it was
more water in Arctic ocean without ice cover as» insulation» - > water absorbed extra coldness and the currents brought extra coldness in North Atlantic = above the ocean is colder = less
evaporation - > less water vapor produced - > less moisture going west from central Atlantic.
LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America —
because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more heat / was accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation d
because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing
more heat / was accumulating - > radiating + spreading
more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean —
because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation d
because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting
more ice on arctic also as chain reaction —
Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation d
Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the
evaporation deficit.
The geochemist Wallace Broecker, to whom we owe a number of the important ideas about abrupt climate change, speculates that there is a chain of causation starting with
more far - northern winter sea ice and (
because of the ice preventing the winds from stirring up waves and
evaporation and salt excess) thereby fewer sinks for the Gulf Stream, which in turn diminishes the big conveyor loop of currents linking the North Atlantic to the Pacific.
The claim that this is from the extra «back radiation» from
more CO2 is the scientific equivalent of bollocks
because IR causes
more evaporation, not temperature rise.
Because of excessive
evaporation, tropical surface water is
more saline.
Very little energy goes for cooling,
because evaporation is a much
more cost effective means of cooling.
is only achieved
because of
evaporation requiring
more energy than is needed to induce it.
The skin layer does get warmer with
more DLR but at the same time the interacting layer above it gets cooler
because of the deficit created by increased
evaporation taking place in that interacting layer.
More DLR increases
Evaporation and that increases the amount of latent heat required and also increases upward Convection
because water vapour is lighter than air.
The alarmists are half aware of the potential negative influence of convection, clouds,
evaporation, condensation and rainfall
because they say that a warmer Earth will have
more and / or bigger storms.
It is another fallacy to say that there will be
more clouds driven by AGW
because of
more evaporation, for the same reason R. Humidity should drop creating less clouds, reducing cloud albedo making the earth even
more warmer.
He also notes that it has a feedback effect, which it clearly does
because heating of bodies of water increases
evaporation, putting
more WVP in the atmosphere, and increasing it's GH impact.
This «S» shape goes away at night not
because evaporation is less powerful, but rather
because the input (solar) has gone away and the natural rising takes on a
more logarithmic shape by depth where output is the only variable.
In fact, research has shown that pan
evaporation can decrease
because surrounding
evaporation increases, making the pan
evaporation more an effect of atmospheric water budgets and contents than irradiance.
This
evaporation of a promise is compounded in the
more repressive societies and emerging markets
because — even where you get rapid economic growth — it can not absorb the demographic bulge of young people fast enough to deliver rising living standards for enough of them.