Sentences with phrase «more evaporation from»

For it to be snowier, you have to have more evaporation from the oceans, which means more heat, not more cool.

Higher temperatures cause more evaporation from the oceans; water vapour is a strong greenhouse gas;

There is growing evidence that this has already occurred31 through more evaporation from the ocean, which increases water vapor in the lower atmosphere32 and autumn cloud cover west and north of Alaska.33

However there would then be more conduction, convection and on Earth more evaporation from the surface for an increased upward energy flow which would work to maintain the lapse rate set by sun and pressure.

The primary driver of Earth's hydrological cycle is more evaporation from a warming planet and warming seas (which climate engineering is making worse overall, not better).

And once wide swaths of tree are cut, large land areas lose their shade cover, resulting in more evaporation from the soil, further reducing water flows.

Still more evaporation from the soil and an increased risk of drought.

While climate change does not cause droughts, it can make them worse, as a warmer atmosphere leads to more evaporation from soils.

Higher temperatures lead to more evaporation from lakes, rivers and oceans, and warmer air can hold more moisture.

Higher temperatures lead to more evaporation from

When droughts do occur, they will be more intense than those in the past, because higher temperatures will lead to more evaporation from soils and transpiration from plants.

That heat has helped lead to more evaporation from soils and transpiration from plants.

As the planet warms from climate change, there is more evaporation from both land and water surfaces.

Increased temperatures trigger more evaporation from reservoirs, and accelerate water loss from soils needed for agricultural production — all factors that boost demand for water, he added.

Not exact matches

Our evaporation specialists knows all about efficient evaporation from vapour velocity, wetting rates and the perfect temperature to prevent harming the product Read more

«During the evaporation of the water from the ocean, the water molecules formed by lighter isotopes will get preferentially evaporated, while during condensation the heavier isotopes will condense more effectively,» he says.

«It turns out that Titan's north pole is even more interesting than we thought, with a complex interplay of liquids in lakes and seas and deposits left from the evaporation of past lakes and seas.»

The river water reaching the Nile Delta does not contain a third more salt than before the Aswan High Dam was built: it is the same amount of salt, only more concentrated due to the evaporation from Lake Nasser.

More to explore Just Keep Cool — How Evaporation Affects Heating and Cooling, from Science Buddies Specific Heat, Heat of Vaporization and Density of Water, from Khan Academy Perspiration Cooling of Body, from HyperPhysics Heat of Vaporization of Water and Ethanol, from Khan Academy Science Activities for All Ages!

Alarmists have drawn some support for increased claims of tropical storminess from a casual claim by Sir John Houghton of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a warmer world would have more evaporation, with latent heat providing more energy for disturbances.

Only about 40 % of the water reaches the crops, while evaporation in the hot sun takes more than two metres of water a year from the reservoirs - a total of around 300m cubic metres from Elephant Butte alone.

Increased temperature leads to increased evaporation from the sea, and thus to higher absolute humidity (assuming fixed relative humidity), and since H2O molecules are even more effective infrared absorbers than CO 2 molecules, the warming trend is reinforced.

Less glacial runoff = less water to dam More drought = less water to dam Hotter, dryer conditions = faster evaporation from dam reservoirs.

«Century of Data Shows Intensification of Water Cycle but No Increase in Storms or Floods Released: 3/15/2006 12:13:21 PM» (excerpt) A review of the findings from more than 100 peer - reviewed studies shows that although many aspects of the global water cycle have intensified, including precipitation and evaporation, this trend has not consistently resulted in an increase in the frequency or intensity of tropical storms or floods over the past century.

Duration could vary: a more intense storm may peter out more quickly by having used up the available energy in the immediate vicinity (from convergence in the atmosphere as air spirals in, to surface moisture from evaporation in the strong winds) unless it moves into a new environment.

(I think that an anomalously warm ocean surface heated from below would lead to more evaporation, and the additional water vapor would give a positive greenhouse effect that would partially offset the effect of a drop in greenhouse gas concentrations.)

«Even if an area remains wet doesn't mean that it will be protected from the other aspects of climate change: rising and far more erratic air temperatures, higher rates of evaporation (evapotranspiration), and the rising concentration of CO2,» he said in an e-mail message.

The kinetic energy from the falling rain that occurs after condensation then feeds the circular winds that in turn draw more heat from evaporation etc. so as to form a positive feedback loop.

More water by Danube to replenish the deficit from evaporation in Mediterranean > gulf stream slows.

Also, what are the energy budget implications of the increased evaporation from more open ocean?

Water levels are influenced by the amount of evaporation from decreased ice cover and warmer air temperatures, by evapotranspiration from warmer air temperatures, and by potential increases in inflow from more precipitation.

Evaporation is known to be on the order of 70 w / m2, while average downwelling longwave radiation is more than four times that amount... and some of the evaporation is surely coming from the heating from the visEvaporation is known to be on the order of 70 w / m2, while average downwelling longwave radiation is more than four times that amount... and some of the evaporation is surely coming from the heating from the visevaporation is surely coming from the heating from the visible light.

The second clue is that Northern Hemisphere glaciation intensified between 3.1 and 2.5 million years ago, thanks to all the moisture delivered to the far north via evaporation from a more vigorous Gulf Stream.

«You have more evaporation, more energy, more heat and that's driving more moisture from the tropics which is where these atmospheric rivers originate,» Lynn Ingram, a professor of Earth and Planetary Science at the University of California, Berkeley, told IBT.

Even in areas where precipitation does not decrease, these increases in surface evaporation and loss of water from plants lead to more rapid drying of soils if the effects of higher temperatures are not offset by other changes (such as reduced wind speed or increased humidity).5 As soil dries out, a larger proportion of the incoming heat from the sun goes into heating the soil and adjacent air rather than evaporating its moisture, resulting in hotter summers under drier climatic conditions.6

The process of evaporation also requires energy from heat, and the warmer the temperatures are in the upper ocean and at the ocean surface, the more energy is available.

In that surface warming causes more evaporation; which produces more atmospheric warming and ultimately more clouds; which block sun from the surface; which produces more cooling.

Open water emits more infra - red energy to space and evaporation of surface water in the windy Arctic region will remove substantial amounts of heat from the surface.

The lack of» water vapor» is, because: it was more water in Arctic ocean without ice cover as» insulation» - > water absorbed extra coldness and the currents brought extra coldness in North Atlantic = above the ocean is colder = less evaporation - > less water vapor produced - > less moisture going west from central Atlantic.

This is a logical result of the fact that a warmer Earth will have increased evaporation from the oceans, and thus more moisture will be available for precipitation.

Although the Middle East is not currently rebounding from an ice age, the scientists say those ancient rebounds have things in common with the way the climate is changing today: Rainfall is decreasing and higher temperatures are causing more evaporation that is drying up the land.

Note 1: A simple hotspot explanation summarized from this article: Increasing CO2 levels causes atmosphere to warm; then atmosphere causes Earth's surface to warm; warming of oceans cause evaporation; increased evaporation leads to more water vapor in the upper troposphere; water vapor is a powerful greenhouse gas that warms the atmosphere even more (positive water vapor feedback); the Earth's surface warms even more; and then auto «repeat and rinse» until Earth's oceans boil, per an «expert.»

He had already been warned on this thread that when I had earlier answered a legitimate question from a commenter far more polite and sensible than he, I had replied with a straightforward account of how Professor Lindzen, in a talk that he had given under my chairmanship at the Houses of Parliament, had calculated that if the increase in evaporation from the Earth's surface with warming was thrice that which the models predicted then climate sensitivity was one - third of that which the models predicted.

They thought the increased evaporation from CO2 would make things even warmer since water vapor is a more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2.

You claim such a justification from the coincidence that the 1 % to 3 % increase in evaporation seen across the models yields a range of climate sensitivities more or less in line with the IPCC range.

(right) With the transition from dimming to brightening (1980s — 2000s), the enhanced greenhouse effect has no longer been masked, causing more rapid warming, stronger evaporation / LH, and an intensification of the water cycle.

The geochemist Wallace Broecker, to whom we owe a number of the important ideas about abrupt climate change, speculates that there is a chain of causation starting with more far - northern winter sea ice and (because of the ice preventing the winds from stirring up waves and evaporation and salt excess) thereby fewer sinks for the Gulf Stream, which in turn diminishes the big conveyor loop of currents linking the North Atlantic to the Pacific.

Remember that fresh water freezes more easily than the ocean's usual salt water, so if downwelling fails locally, a puddle of fresher water may form from the rains or floods — and it will freeze more easily, preventing the winds from doing their evaporation job that might restart the downwelling.

But, if the atmosphere in the polar regions warms there will be more evaporation and thus a postive feedback from greenhouse effect of increased water vapor.

The claim that this is from the extra «back radiation» from more CO2 is the scientific equivalent of bollocks because IR causes more evaporation, not temperature rise.