That means that we are in for a lot
more evidence of climate change, Francis says.
Not exact matches
Decades
of scientific investigation across multiple lines
of evidence corroborate a powerful yet inconvenient truth: Human - caused global warming and
climate change is real, and it's briskly accelerating as we dump
more carbon into the atmosphere.
We have much better — and
more conclusive —
evidence for
climate change from
more boring sources like global temperature averages, or the extent
of global sea ice, or thousands
of years» worth
of C02 levels stored frozen in ice cores.
The UK
Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017 evidence report, prepared for the UK Government by the the Committee on Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks of climate
Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017 evidence report, prepared for the UK Government by the the Committee on Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks of climate c
Change Risk Assessment 2017
evidence report, prepared for the UK Government by the the Committee on
Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks of climate
Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks of climate c
Change, identifies where
more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks
of climate climate changechange.
In a speech later Mr Huhne told his party's conference that
evidence of climate change was becoming «
more alarming, not less» and said he wanted to see a huge expansion in the number
of offshore wind farms but that this would go hand in hand with nuclear power.
AG Eric Schneiderman said the Buffalo snowstorms are
more evidence that
climate change is happening, and that New York and the nation need to work harder to combat the causes
of global warming.
The State's Attorney General says the Buffalo snowstorms are
more evidence that
climate change is happening, and that New York and the nation need to work harder to combat the causes
of global warming.
When compared to other religious groups, Evangelicals have often been
more wary
of science as
evidenced in debates about evolution, stem cell research, and
climate change.
And the
evidence of change has mounted as
climate records have grown longer, as our understanding
of the
climate system has improved and as
climate models have become ever
more reliable.
Evidence of the impact
of one or
more extraterrestrial objects 13,000 years ago in northern North America has led some scientists to posit that those events dramatically
changed the
climate, eventually wiping out the species.
«The language style used by
climate change skeptics suggests that the arguments put forth by these groups may be less credible in that they are relatively less focused upon the propagation
of evidence and
more intent on refuting the opposing perspective,» said Pennycook.
In contrast, there was little
evidence of biological
change at
more southerly lakes in Labrador — where
climate has warmed only minimally.
It might be tempting to dismiss this as yet
more evidence of the US right divorcing itself from scientific reality, as has happened in debates over evolution and
climate change.
Trudeau has also said his party will embrace «
evidence based policy» and «data - driven decision - making,» do
more to address
climate change, protect endangered species, and review the environmental impact
of major energy and development projects.»
«These findings add to mounting
evidence suggesting that there are sweet spots or «windows
of opportunity» within
climate space where so - called boundary conditions, such as the level
of atmospheric CO2 or the size
of continental ice sheets, make abrupt
change more likely to occur.
«The
more certain climatologists become that humans are affecting global
climates,» they conclude, «the
more critical epidemiologists should be
of the
evidence indicating that these
changes affect malaria.»
To say hurricane Katrina was an indication
of climate change is no
more correct than saying the current cold outbreak is
evidence against
climate change — I mean, that's weather — but it does influence people.
There is
evidence that Arctic blasts
of frigid air could become
more common as a result
of climate change, though scientists say
more study is needed to firmly draw any conclusions.
In particular, it will be
more careful about ensuring that it lays out the
evidence for any assertion it makes about the likelihood
of any effect
of climate change, said Chris Field, a U.S. scientist and a leader
of the panel's 2014 report.
The
evidence of the success
of early rice farmers on the vast wetlands near the Guaporé River in Rondônia state, Brazil, could help modern day plant breeders develop rice crops which are less susceptible to disease and
more adaptable to the effects
of climate change than the Asian varieties.
But the arguments are
changing as scientists see
more evidence of the coming impact
of climate change on the Atlantic fisheries.
In 1996, when
climate research was
more certain about the link between fossil fuel combustion and
climate change than during the time
of Shaw's memo, Exxon's new chairman and chief executive Lee Raymond said in a speech in Detroit: «Currently, the scientific
evidence is inconclusive as to whether human activities are having a significant effect on the global
climate.»
The understanding
of the physics
of greenhouse gases and the accumulation
of evidence for GHG - driven
climate change is now overwhelming — and much
of that information has not yet made it into formal attribution studies — thus scientists on the whole are
more sure
of the attribution than is reflected in those papers.
Re 92 and 105: First I just want to reitterate
more generally what 105 said — Milankovitch cycles have had
climate signals, in ice ages or otherwise, — well probably ever since the Moon formed, although the signal from times past will not always reach us, but I've read
of evidence of Milankovitch precession cycle forcing
of monsoons in lakes in Pangea (PS over geologic time the periods
of some
of the Milankovitch cycles have
changed as the Moon recedes from the Earth due to tides).
The Project The Raising Risk Awareness project seeks to assess the role
of human - induced
climate change in the risk
of extreme weather events in developing countries and identify how such scientific
evidence could help to bridge the science - communications - policy gap, and enable these countries and communities to become
more resilient in a warming world.
Some have noted an even
more fundamental problem: Soon's claim that any
evidence of a sun effect means carbon dioxide is not driving
climate change.
The scientific
evidence for global warming and for humanity's role in the increase
of greenhouse gasses becomes ever
more unimpeachable, as the [United Nations] IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change 4th Assessment Report] findings are going to suggest; and such activity has a profound relevance, not just for the environment, but in ethical, economic, social and political terms as well.
The researchers looked at
more than 800 U.S. cases involving
climate change or coal - fired power plants between 1990 and 2016, and found a dramatic rise in both the number
of climate cases and the proportion that relied on scientific
evidence, according to first author Sabrina McCormick, a sociologist at George Washington University in Washington.
Michael Mann added that «Donald Trump and his campaign still firmly reject the scientific
evidence that
climate change is human - caused, opposing the only action (a reduction
of fossil fuel burning) that can save us from ever -
more dangerous
climate change impacts,» according to EcoWatch.
Hotstar - Watch free online streaming
of your favourite TV serials & movies - Hindi, Tamil, Bengali &
more with Live cricket streaming & highlights at Explore the
Climate Hot Map to see evidence of climate change including heat waves, sea - level rise, flooding, melting glaciers, earlier spring
Climate Hot Map to see
evidence of climate change including heat waves, sea - level rise, flooding, melting glaciers, earlier spring
climate change including heat waves, sea - level rise, flooding, melting glaciers, earlier spring arrival
Armed law enforcement officers are not educators, social workers, or counselors, and overwhelming
evidence shows that when schools involve law enforcement in minor, non-violent behavioral infractions, students
of color are disproportionately impacted.1 In our 2015 policy paper,
Climate Change: Creating Safe, Supportive Schools for All Students, E4E - New York members pointed out that there are
more police officers than school counselors in New York City schools and called on the NYC Department
of Education to turn this shameful number on its head by increasing the amount
of school counselors.
A few things are unequivocal, perhaps (doubling from the present concentration
of CO2 will take 140 years [give or take]; the idea that the
changes in
climate since 1880 have been in the aggregate beneficial; it takes
more energy to vaporize a kg
of water than to raise its temperature by 1K; ignoring the energy cost
of water and latent heat transport [in the hydrologic cycle] leads to equilibrium calculations overestimating the
climate sensitivity), but most are propositions that I think need
more research, but can't be refuted on present
evidence.
So yes, there is a conundrum
of evidence that
more than implicates humans as a major contributor to Global
Climate Change.
I don't think anyone denies that the sun matters for
climate, but the question is whether the variability
of the sun in recent history has had the impact that we project from greenhouse gases over the next 100 — and there, I think, a majority
of your «AGW» ers» would think the
evidence suggests that
changes in human forcing will likely be several times (at least) larger than any solar variability we've seen in a thousand years or
more.
Instead they should look at the underlying, longer term trends for the
climate which were
more «robust»
evidence of the
changes which are happening.
There is
of course
more, but I'm going to stop because I realize that while all this is good
evidence for harms caused by anthropogenic
climate change in general, to be really relevant to the topic at hand, we should be looking at the specific harms alleged by the plaintiffs in the suit over which judge Alsup is presiding.
Some issue advocates have argued that the term
climate change is
more likely to engage Republicans in the issue, however, the
evidence from these studies suggests that in general the terms are synonymous for Republicans — i.e., neither term is
more engaging than the other, although in several cases, global warming generates stronger feelings
of negative affect and stronger perceptions
of personal and familial threat among Republicans; they are also
more likely to believe that global warming is already affecting weather in the United States.
But the GFDL study is based on a state -
of - the - art high - resolution model that is
more appropriate for hurricane studies and provides important
evidence suggesting that
climate change may have an effect on the TCs.
«In both groups, attitudes towards
climate change became significantly
MORE Sceptical after reading the editorials, but we observed no
evidence of attitude polarisation — that is, the attitudes
of these two groups did not diverge.»
The patient is showing
more and
more of the syndrome, and although we can not be sure that each particular symptom is due to
climate change rather than some other cause, the combined
evidence justifies strong confidence that the syndrome is present.
So here's to the researchers willing to endure ridiculous conditions to add one
more pixel to the pointillist painting showing, through the balance
of evidence, that big long - lasting
changes to
climate are afoot.
Dr. Prather's comment is worth posting here on its own as a starting point for
more discussion
of how scientists can best help society weigh
evidence pointing to human - caused
climate change and attendant risks and consider how to respond if people ever got inspired to do so:
We have now
more scientific
evidence of the reality
of climate change and its human contribution....
McIntyre and others are
more restrained, focusing on the decline shown by tree ring data, which is one form
of climate change evidence.
UR, I would be very interested in examining any
of your
evidence for (a) rapid
climate change (weather patterns over a min
of 30 years, WMO definition) because I couldn't find any after three ebooks and 6 years
of research), and
more importantly, (b) any that are likely mainly anthropogenic.
U.S. cities suing energy companies over
climate change may have mischaracterized their own
evidence, casting
more doubt on the validity
of the litigation and putting an additional spotlight on the environmental activists who are steering the broader campaign.
Thanks to a growing body
of scientific
evidence and improved computer models that can project
climate changes more accurately and in much finer detail, each report has proclaimed with greater and greater certainty that human activity is the main cause
of global warming.
The unequivocal and indisputable
climate research clearly demonstrates that
climate change is constant; and when combined with historical accounts and anecdotal
evidence, warmer
climates tend to favor prosperity and peace outcomes while cooler periods provide
more of the opposite.
They're asking the government to reflect on the proof
of climate change evidenced by this year's droughts, heat waves, raging wildfires, and floods — made all the
more real by Hurricane Sandy.
It's their shared apprehension that opposing positions on
climate change are, in effect, badges
of membership in and loyalty to competing cultural groups; that is the cue or signal that motivates members
of the public to process information about
climate change risks in a manner that is
more reliably geared to affirming the position that predominates in their group than to converging on the best available
evidence.