Sentences with phrase «more explanation on»

You all have been interested in seeing more videos so I thought I'd give a bit more explanation on how I created some character and depth to the china cabinet.

Could you point me in the direction of a how to or something that might give more explanation on how that look is achieved?

We've done our best to avoid complex jargon but take a look at our jargon buster if you need more explanation on any terms we use.

You as the service provider are liable if you can not produce the identification of the original offender (read on the topic of § 1004 BGB Störerhaftung, more explanation on what that means is on the Wikipedia page of the same name).

Part Five for more explanation on this, and you will see why the vertical temperature profile through the atmosphere is needed).

The largest building blocks are atmosphere, ocean, ice and land surface (should be more explanation on this breakdown in the next part on the Models On and Off the Catwalk series.

A little more explanation on what everything did would have been appreciated, I basically had to figure out each item's use from playing the missions.

Can someone provide some more explanation on how is this possible and provide a clear example?

Need to see much more explanation on why a 4321 puts more players in the box, seems like pure cool story bro at the moment.

You might find a little more explanation on my About page.

You can find more explanations on the behavioral meaning of punishment and reinforcement in the links below

Finally, the IRS recently published IRS Tax Tip 2015 - 42 and more explanations on the simplified deduction method.

Not exact matches

But I've yet to see a really robust version of that argument, let alone an explanation of why firing makes more sense, ethically, that this punishment alone is the right one, ethically, than all those other outcomes, or — for those who believe this is true — why he deserves everything on the menu.

For much more on the biological explanations of how various foods affect your body and more detailed advice on how to eat right for consistent energy, check out Klatell's complete post.

Click here for the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's more detailed explanation.

«If you're wondering why marketers seem intent on e-mailing you more and more,» McKinsey states, «there's a simple explanation: it works.»

The better explanation is that I hadn't really focused on a much bigger boat and a far more material movement.

The simplified explanation for this aberrant investing disaster was a dramatic rise in interest rates during the period: Rates on long - term government bonds went from 4 % at year - end 1964 to more than 15 % in 1981.

As part of the explanation as to why Europe gives proportionately more ODA, Gunzburg noted that countries with bigger welfare states — like those for which the Scandinavian nations are famed — tend to pay higher taxes, leading to more government revenue that can be spent on aid.

What matters, in these cases, is that someone on your team is brave enough, vulnerable enough, to use a sentence that starts with, «The story I'm making up right now is...» The idea is to reach the truth as quickly possible, instead of wandering around with your made - up explanation, which more than likely consists of your own shame triggers, and has little relation to reality.

One explanation is that CEOs in larger firms have less of a direct impact on the company's performance — perhaps because they delegate more than CEOs at smaller firms.

It usually requires an explanation on the order of infinite retention («yes, our sales and marketing costs are really high and our annual profit margins per user are thin, but we're going to keep the customer forever»), a massive reduction in costs («we're going to replace all our human labor with robots»), a claim that eventually the company can stop buying users («we acquire users for more than they're worth for now just to get the flywheel spinning»), or something even less plausible.

«Our company employs more females, African Americans and Hispanics than most tech companies do,» one participant offered as an explanation for awarding their employer a passing grade on diversity.

If you are looking for a more advanced explanation that is suited for wealthy individuals and professional investors, I wrote about this same topic on my personal blog awhile ago in a post called How a Holding Company Works.

Around the same time, the exchange posted a more thorough explanation of the circumstances surrounding the closure on its website:

But in this case, there seems to be a plausible and perfectly innocent explanation for the traffic pattern suggested by an IT consultant named Naadir Jeewa and endorsed by security expert Robert Graham: The Trump organization is sending out promotional emails about Trump hotels, and one or more Alfa Bank employees is on the recipient list.

(Search this site for articles on Risk in investment if you want more, or see my comments on the attempt last year to Debunk Buffett by applying fully half - a-dozen «explanations» to his results.

The word wholesale means sale of goods on large quantity for resale to consumers whose prices are lesser compared to retail (who sell small quantity) and more detail explanation is that it is sold in lots, like dozen, hundreds.

That's a nice explanation — but many critics argue that the slowed speeds were less about extending battery life, and more about encouraging customers to upgrade their phones on a frequent basis.

A previous Bitcoin Magazine article provides a step - by - step explanation of a simple example where two users agree to swap agreed amounts of BTC and LTC and use the multisig and time lock features available in both Bitcoin and Litecoin basic scripting to synchronize two transactions on two independent blockchains without having to trust each other.It's worth noting that Lightning Network payment channels, now enabled by SegWit, make atomic swaps more powerful and easier to implement, and permit adding support for off - chain swaps.

And finally, on a more intellectual level, I have never heard an explanation of life that makes more sense than the one in which God exists.

For more on this line of reasoning, read The Challenge of Jesus by NT Wright, or the more detailed explanation in Jesus and the Victory of God.

Without pretending to exhaust the explanations, let me therefore add one more, which occurred to me while doing research on American religion in what John Higham called «the tribal twenties» and the dreary aftermath in the 1930s.

But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).

For it would seem that the arguments from order and from contingency either rest on a misunderstanding of what an explanation is, or more likely, on an arbitrary supposition that man's experience is intelligible precisely in this way.

This piece reads much more like an opinion piece on God's morality than an explanation of why God flooded the Earth.

I hope to write more on this topic in the future so that the pertinent biblical texts can receive a fuller treatment and better explanation than what I have provided here.

Since on the face of it Whitehead's assumption that the experience of CE is reliable seems unsubstantiated, the Principle of Charity demands some explanation to make his assumption more plausible.

Such people always think that something is explained providing it is only brought in late, and that what comes later on no longer needs any explanation of its origin, apparently thinking that the more empty the beginning, the easier the final plenitude is to explain.

Even more to the point, no two modern - day scholars seem able to draw up the same common list of errors, each finding on the other's worksheet difficulties which have, in their opinion, plausible modern - day alternate explanations often involving a reassessment of the author's intention and / or cultural context.

We have attempted to provide more explanation than many other study Bibles on some of the difficult passages of scripture.

On naturalistic principles, there's no explanation for why a debate is more important than the two soda bottles fizzing.

The final three chapters summarily consider the evidence against and for the virgin birth, arguing that it is neither myth nor indemonstrable truth; instead the evidence for the existence of an historical tradition anteceding the Gospels, ultimately from Mary herself, is more credible than any alternative explanation; hence, for anyone open to the possibility of miracles, there is good evidence to affirm Jesus» virgin birth on the basis of the New Testament's testimony.

The true explanation is much more beautiful: the angle of refraction and reflection depend on wavelength; so waterdrops act like little prisms and spread the colors out for us.

On my Podcast, I take a more theological / literary approach to understanding Genesis 1, but Walton's explanation of Genesis 1 could easily be incorporated into it so that Genesis 1 is also seen as historical.

If you get a bit of time and want a more detailed explanation (of the Word of God being much more than «just the Bible»), then listen to this class on the subject.

In other words, Ogden's analysis of various descriptions of experience is informed by two distinctions, both of which apply to the noetic pole of experience: a twofold distinction between nonsensuous and sensory modes of experience and a threefold distinction of what Whitehead calls «the feeling of the ego, the others, the totality,» that is, of self, other, and whole (PP 84).8 This comprehensive hermeneutical grid then permits an explanation of what he claims is a «sense of ourselves and others as of transcendent worth,» as precisely an «awareness of ourselves and the world as of worth to God» (PP 86f) Y Ogden notes that such an evidently theistic explanation is not open to empirical or experiential confirmation on either of the two more restrictive descriptions which, as he observes, must either «refer the word God» to some merely creaturely reality or process of interaction, or else., must deny it all reference whatever by construing its meaning as wholly noncognitive,» if they seek experiential illustration for such a sense at all (PP 80) 10

After all, I have admitted that a free - will theodicy will be inherently more «defensive» than the process theodicy — that a free - will theodicy will be at points less able than the process theodicy to offer explanations for evil that flow in a natural, intuitive sense from the theistic tenets on which it is built — and isn't it reasonable to assume that the theodicy which is least defensive in this sense should be considered most plausible?

Syntheses are usually between more or less equal things, and your stance on this can not but encourage the prevailing belief that science has replaced religion as a superior explanation of everything.

Flood touches on issues that leaves the reader wanting a fuller, deeper, more detailed explanation and defense.