Not exact matches
There's been no explicit
explanation, but cleansing risk
from financial markets has been a government mantra for
more than two years.
However, many experts believe the
explanation is at least an oversimplification and at most an intent to deflect attention away
from more fundamental weaknesses in the financial markets.
The simplified
explanation for this aberrant investing disaster was a dramatic rise in interest rates during the period: Rates on long - term government bonds went
from 4 % at year - end 1964 to
more than 15 % in 1981.
I will wait for your
more intelligent
explanation from your all knowing powerful brain.
In fact, you don't even have to have studied psychology to give the
explanation I did, which makes the proposal that it was a god who was nagging at Darwin all the
more embarrassing,
from my point of view.
More seriously, there could be three possible
explanations of why we haven't heard
from aliens.
'' Thomas Jefferson omitted it (Revelation) along with most of the Biblical canon,
from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he considered it (Revelation) as «merely the ravings of a maniac, no
more worthy nor capable of
explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.»
[30] Thomas Jefferson omitted it along with most of the Biblical canon,
from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he «considered it as merely the ravings of a maniac, no
more worthy nor capable of
explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.»
Contemporary methodology has not discontinued these methods in its new understanding of history, but has merely shifted them
more decidedly
from ends to means It is true that the «
explanation» of an event or viewpoint does not consist merely in showing its external causes or identifying the source
from which an idea was borrowed.
The
more definitely the written law became established as canonical and regarded as infallibly inspired, the
more surely could the
explanation of the sacrifices be transferred
from the realm of animistic superstition, where they really started, to the realm of sacred observance ordained by God and for that reason faithfully to be maintained.
But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote
from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even
more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic
explanation at all).
For it would seem that the arguments
from order and
from contingency either rest on a misunderstanding of what an
explanation is, or
more likely, on an arbitrary supposition that man's experience is intelligible precisely in this way.
That made
more sense (historically) then a lot of the
explanations I have gotten even
from my religion teacher.
Most of the
explanations of Romans 9 I have read
from Calvinists seem to be completely off track and do
more to undermine the character of God than glorify it.
I opposed, first of all, the view that God intends all human beings to be heterosexual, and that therefore a failure to be heterosexual represents a deviation
from God's creative plan — a deviation that demands an
explanation, usually given in terms of sin, or
more recently, in terms of sickness.
Thomas Jefferson omitted it (Revelation) along with most of the Biblical canon,
from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he «considered it as merely the ravings of a maniac, no
more worthy nor capable of
explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.»
[30] Thomas Jefferson omitted it along with most of the Biblical canon,
from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he «considered it as merely the ravings of a ma - niac, no
more worthy nor capable of
explanation than the inc - oherences of our own nightly dreams.»
Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keeps one's faith separated
from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational
explanations as to why there are reportedly many
more of God's many sons then what Christendom so portends there to be...
Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keep one's faith separated
from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational
explanations as to why there are reportedly many
more of God's many sons then what Christendom so potentially claims there to be...
Naturalistic
explanations have already been successful enough in explaining natural order to conclude with assurance that the argument
from design simply does not carry much weight any
more.
Then, after no real
explanation from God, «The LORD blessed the latter part of Job's life
more than the former part» (Job 42:12).
Then I realized that any
explanation I came up with
from this form of thinking would be nothing
more than my own invention.
The final three chapters summarily consider the evidence against and for the virgin birth, arguing that it is neither myth nor indemonstrable truth; instead the evidence for the existence of an historical tradition anteceding the Gospels, ultimately
from Mary herself, is
more credible than any alternative
explanation; hence, for anyone open to the possibility of miracles, there is good evidence to affirm Jesus» virgin birth on the basis of the New Testament's testimony.
After all, I have admitted that a free - will theodicy will be inherently
more «defensive» than the process theodicy — that a free - will theodicy will be at points less able than the process theodicy to offer
explanations for evil that flow in a natural, intuitive sense
from the theistic tenets on which it is built — and isn't it reasonable to assume that the theodicy which is least defensive in this sense should be considered most plausible?
Below are seven categories (which have been revised
from time to time since the original publication of this article), with a little
more explanation.
Christian protology / eschatology is
more properly a cosmogony, i.e., an
explanation of the origin and purpose of the world system, which must, in the nature of the case, come
from beyond the system if it exists at all.
Thus we have two forms of inquiry, the one restricting itself to the study of behavior, the description of behavior being austerely limited to geometrical and arithmetical properties, and the other also studying behavior, but interpreting it as far
more than merely that, and as having its meaning, and perhaps also in part its causal
explanation, in terms of a large class of concepts excluded
from the physicists»
explanations.
They are
more inclined to accept
explanations from official sources,
from «experts,»
from company officials,
from well prepared hand - outs created by public relations experts, than to go to the trouble to dig out opposing views that often are represented by small, inefficient, underfinanced and even unpopular groups.
Charles Hartshorne says that the notion that God is
more perfect the
more completely he is removed
from change, time, and risk, is a prejudice which simply contradicts our experience of human love.13 What we have to look for is some
explanation of why the tradition that perfect love is beyond suffering has such a powerful hold.
The message he brought was a polite request
from the Bishop not to publish anything
more on the topic for the moment, and for the moment not to publish the
Explanations either.
Since all of the details are natural rather than artificial, and the
explanation is separate
from the parable itself, it is
more probable that the
explanation simply uses the text already found in the stage of the development concerned.
I do know some of the arguments for why the flood is scientifically implausible, but I think there are alternative
explanations for where all the water came
from (and where it is today) that might make it
more plausible.
There has to be reasonable
explanation behind his suicidel decision not to buy the necesery players for the past three years, but nothing he has said or done warrants any sound
explanation for our short fall in the EPL that is apart
from us the fans we are to blame for not being
more supportive
missing out on kyrchowik is just being arrogant thinking coq is going to do the job & then after the season get over we will hear
more logical
explanations from wenger
more stats etc
A
more understandable
explanation would be that Pulis is reluctant to throw in Pritchard, who has very limited Premier League experience, while his side are still not safe
from relegation.
Keep your
explanation simple by saying something like, «War is meant to prevent
more bad things
from happening in the future.»
For parents who want to provide
more structured maths teaching, there are many worksheets and clear
explanations from the basic through to advanced and complex maths.
Your little one will be able to understand
more than you may think, and a heartfelt
explanation from you may make your child feel much less alone or confused when it's time to make this big change in his or her life.
To read a
more detailed
explanation of what is taking place during this science investigation, check out this article
from Steve Spangler.
The various psychological
explanations from childhood onward are presumably meant to make us understand Mugabe
more.
@ Luis Enrique (and a bit @ Thomas): A conception of what political philosophy does might be something like: attempts to systematize political structures, in order both to provide as coherent an
explanation as possible of our current intuitions, and extrapolate
from them to prescriptions for how they might be improved / made
more consistent.
A ray of hope is that the international treaties and institutions Trump might like to withdraw
from enjoy sufficient support
from other states that the costs of doing so would be too great for the U.S., or they will continue to function despite withdrawal by the U.S. Let's hope that IR's preference for international
explanations is warranted this time and that we can conclude that international norms and institutions matter
more than we previously thought.
But, he pointed out, «we concluded
from an examination of the subsequent outturn data that the impact of external inflation shocks, deteriorating export markets and financial sector and eurozone difficulties were
more likely
explanations».
I'm interested in an authoritative response with authoritative sources, like scholarship
from historians or political scientists, so that I can have a
more solid understanding in the face of competing
explanations about the shift.
From the page that you link, in the
explanation of voting in communes with
more than 1000 inhabitants1, it explains:
What would now be good to see
from governments is
more explanation to their citizens of how the tax system actually works, so the public can makes up its mind with all the facts, such as that corporation tax is paid on profits and not sales and it is legitimate for a subsidiary to pay for the use of intellectual property owned by another group company.
A possible
explanation is that Clarke would indeed win
more votes
from Labour as leader, but they would be partially cancelled out by Tory voters drifting away to UKIP or other fringe parties.
It is important to make this point
from the outset, before going about the business of
explanations — for the benefit of those who may genuinely be ignorant of a crucial factor in the continued inability to resolve some of the
more critical of Nigeria's contradictions.
«What is particularly missing at this time is her coming out in public, meeting her constituents, talking to TV cameras, explaining what happened, perhaps being a little humble about all of this and giving a satisfactory
explanation to her constituents and the wider Conservative family to be quite frank, because speaking to people
from the West Midlands region where she is an MP, these things do have a knock - on effect and there are other marginal seats far closer to her constituency where people have got Labour majorities to overturn which may be
more difficult if the local Conservative politician is seen as tainted and not having justified their actions and also I gather that Conservative Party HQ has had party donors
from the region expressing concern that she hasn't satisfactorily justified what she has done.»
The Blood for Oil banquet is still on the table; one
more good
explanation why the Democrats will continue to take power back
from the Republicans: