Sentences with phrase «more factual evidence»

===== @HotAirAce «There is more factual evidence for recent violence by christians than there is for any god, The Babble or the jesus myth.»

There is more factual evidence for recent violence by christians than there is for any god, The Babble or the jesus myth.

Not exact matches

It is far more significant to me that no believer, not even a top - dog charlatan shaman such as any Pope - A-Dope, can not provide factual, independent, verifiable and objective evidence for their cult's beliefs.

Yeah, that makes much more sense than proven factual evidence of evolution and geology which explains how the earth and all of the other planets were created and how life as we know it in all its forms evolved.

Now that people are more aware of how this scheme works it might be a different story, just as how more people are now aware of how the Bible was actually written and the actual age of the universe to actually accept it as completely factual and as any kind of evidence for a god.

I am (a) A victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make factual assertions when supported by considerable evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.

Again, that's just hypothetical guesswork more than factual evidence.

I am so fed up AKB's like yourself Budd, that criticize real fans because they dare to question the almighty Wenger, even though there is so much factual evidence to support the claims that Wenger is not good enough any more.

«Easy to digest» is a factual statement characterizing the evidence of more rapid digestion of whey - dominant formula, like Bloom & Blossom Ultra Gentle ™ Infant Formula ™, relative to those formulas that are based on whole cow's milk

But Jack is a biopic that doesn't just wish to track a narrative of one insane man, it's far more interested with bigger questions and in actually hiding the facts (an interesting dichotomy considering much of the film was developed on factual evidence).

Evidence of factual backfire is far more tenuous than prior research suggests.

[17] The Teachers» Federation asserts that the judgment is the product of (i) fundamental errors of law regarding interpretation and application of the duty of fair representation, and (ii) a multiplicity of factual errors involving findings not based on the evidence and contrary to the evidence, which are palpable in nature and overriding in effect... [more]

As a more practical point, the Court clearly placed reliance on the factual evidence provided by both parties, including the contemporaneous recordings of telephone conversations between Barclays and Thornbridge, and the oral evidence given in Court.

In the context of «social and legislative facts» — meaning facts about society at large — opinion evidence becomes all the more menacing, because it is all but impossible to cross-examine the expert against a clear factual record.

[15] In this regard, I consider this kind of factual evidence to be analogous to those matters described by Madam Justice Garson as being «more in the nature of observations» as opposed to inferences having complex interpretive or diagnostic components when she described how their inclusion in records sought to be admitted as business records did not offend Rule 40A in Egli v. Egli, 2003 BCSC 1716 at para. 25 which was relied on by the defendant in submissions.

Indeed, while live expert testimony is uncommon in claim construction proceedings under the old standard, the Teva decision makes live testimony more likely so the district judge can weigh competing evidence, assess credibility and make specific factual findings.

In light of Teva, a claim construction order based solely on intrinsic evidence will be more easily reversed than a decision with specific factual underpinnings.

National courts in the EU face three kinds of challenge in dealing with competition law: - the factual and often legal complexity of many cases — the need to understand often detailed economic and other evidence is routine in most competition cases; - an official policy of encouraging more claimants to come forward and assert their rights; and - the «astonishing diversity» of procedures across the EU for enforcing competition law claims.