For the European Union, to the continued chagrin of
the more federalist among the Europhiles, its main Treaties represent such an «other international agreement».
«they may give
us more federalist MPs by tipping the balance in favour of the pro-EU Liberal Democrat or Labour candidate.»
They have also shown that by putting some of their better candidates and strongest efforts into opposing Eurosceptic Conservatives in seats the Conservatives can win, they may give
us more federalist MPs by tipping the balance in favour of the pro-EU Liberal Democrat or Labour candidate.
QUOTE FROM REDWOOD: «they may give
us more federalist MPs by tipping the balance in favour of the pro-EU Liberal Democrat or Labour candidate»
Not exact matches
And there was the underlying mentality of many of the
more ardent Euro -
federalists in the leading countries, including many British, French and Italians; that the coming together of Europe was a miraculous renascence that would restore to the old continent the headship of the world.
It is possible the process will highlight pre-existing tensions among the remaining EU members — between those states that believe in moving toward a
more deeply integrated,
federalist structure, and those largely opposed to further transfers of power from national to regional bodies, preferring to maintain the status quo — and in doing so hasten the move to a so - called «two - speed» EU.
We are left to ponder whether, in a future case, Kennedy will be swayed
more by his Equal Protection proclivities than his
federalist convictions.
The
Federalists» Constitution was without a doubt a project designed to replace a weak, inefficient Confederacy with a much
more powerful and efficient national state.
I, for one, am glad that Peter puts THE
FEDERALIST more on the LIBERAL EDUCATION than CIVIC EDUCATION list.
My purpose, therefore, is not to provide a systematic critique of the book, but rather to comment on two of its
more interesting aspects, namely: (1) its argument that the
Federalists, in writing the Constitution, were actually defending the principle of the «neutral» state, and (2) its attempt to apply «neutral state» principles to the issues of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.
However, one point that is missing from Ryan's otherwise comprehensive article is how a conservative court would reconcile its
federalist inclinations with a holding that states can not provide a «
more spacious» conception of church - state separation.
We don't have major federal funding earmarked for schools, but we do have equalization payments that (I believe) are
more robust than the US
federalist model.
Wouldn't
federalist want *
more * people to be executed, because the states could avoid further proceedings by killing the people now?