Sentences with phrase «more fees so»

CREA wants more members to pay more fees so they have more money to play with.

The debt collection company will then add - on more fees so that they are profitable.

Not exact matches

Shopkeepers want leverage to negotiate lower fees so they don't have to hike prices; credit companies oppose changes that would make it more difficult to use their cards.

Tesla's future as a mass - market carmaker hinges on efficient, automated production of the Model 3, which more than 400,000 people have already reserved, paying $ 1,000 refundable fees to do so.

What we're trying to do is build a higher level of trust, so that in the long term you can reduce fees and make contactless payment a more trusted transaction.

A big part of ETF appeal is low fees, so how do some ETFs get away with charging 1 percent or more?

Ask yourself: Has the value your adviser provided more this year than last, or has your situation changed so much that it calls for an increase in your fee?

So Smith and Furbershaw set out to liberate Lunar by hitching its fortunes to something more hopeful than the fee - for - service treadmill.

Whether you're lugging gifts for your 15 cousins or you've splurged on a Black Friday bargain for yourself, heavy bags will likely result in more fees, so either ship your gifts home or to your family, or prepare to pay.

And of those businesses with more than 50 employees, 96 percent already offer health insurance and will likely continue to do so regardless of the fee, he says.

Large cable providers like Time Warner, meanwhile, have the potential to make up for some of their cord - cutting losses on the TV side through higher fees for their Internet service - provider business, since those who stream Netflix and other services tend to use up a lot more data by doing so.

To make this new charge even more joyous, some carriers are forcing passengers to collect their bags first, then check - in again for their connecting flight so that they can be charged the new baggage fee in person.

Yes, that means Netflix will have to pay more in network fees, so my monthly bill for watching House of Cards will likely go up.

It paid copying fees to duplicate a lot of that paperwork, which in turn required more temporary help, and so on.

Because of the industry's early ways of marketing, people thought cell phones were free, when in essence the manufacturers hid behind the carriers, making wireless providers charge more in monthly fees so that their $ 700 phones would seem cheap.

Because of this, the Citi Simplicity ® Card - No Late Fees Ever is the more forgiving of the two for customers who might miss a payment every so often.

The $ 140 or so worth of points I earn a year is $ 40 more than my annual fee, and I also get 6000 points with my annual fee.

Selecting the right brokerage can help you reduce fees, so you can earn more on your investments.

Considering everything that goes into our franchise program: local support, low royalty and franchise fees, discounts on equipment / chemicals, unlimited income potential, account expansion opportunities, and so much more we believe Anago is your best option!

So, you want to pay that bill and you use your credit card, but know that fees will apply and it could be 2 percent or more of the balance due.

Flagship doesn't post any information about its rates and fees on its website, though, so interested businesses need to call and get a consultation to get more specific information about exactly what they'll pay monthly.

The independent broker / dealer is lowering a custody threshold so more advisors can take advantage of a flat - rate administration fee.

Aside from the fact that these fees tend to be so costly, the other thing that makes them so burdensome is that banks can charge you more than one in a single day.

This card does charges a $ 95 annual fee so in our opinion, it's more suited for those who plan to...

And Reuters reported last week that even Bank of America was weighing changes to its proposed debit - card fee so that customers would have more chances to avoid it.

The growth in so - called passive investments has put pressure on money managers to drop their fees and build out parts of their business that are more insulated from that pressure, like private - equity or real - estate investments.

a) investing their own money alongside you, so your interests are aligned b) a stake in the company they work at i.e. it is a partnership or employee - owned c) a proven ability to outperform an index over the long - term (at least 10 years) d) reasonable charges — preferably no more than a 1 % management fee and no performance fee e) a concentrated, high conviction portfolio i.e. they do not just hug their benchmark f) a low - asset - turnover ratio i.e. they have a long - term investment horizon and rarely sell investments g) a proven ability to preserve capital during the bad times h) a stable team who have worked together for a number of years.

The best bank accounts are so much more than a place to keep your money - sometimes you're after a high savings rate, other times you're looking for lower fees.

So, even though Lender A has the lowest interest rate advertised, Lender A's points, fees, and other prepaid finance charges actually make Lender A more expensive than Lender C, which is advertising a higher interest rate but lower points and fees than Lender A.

So, if you take out a mortgage for $ 150,000 you'll have to pay roughly $ 3,700 in closing fees, although they could be more if you pay points to buy down your rate.

«In many cases, the asset management has become more commoditized, so advisors are expected to do more if they want to justify their fees,» she said.

Will generally never suggest paying down debt, instead, some adviser would suggest borrowing more money to invest more so that he can get more trailer fees.

As such he will derive greater rewards and satisfactions from his unique social contribution than his more specialized co-professionals in medicine, law, and so on can attain, despite the lucrative fees they command.

When service is requested at a place so distant from the evaluator's headquarters that a total of one - half hour or more is required for the evaluator (s) to travel to such place and back to the headquarters or at a place of prior assignment on circuitous routing requiring a total of one - half hour or more to travel to the next place of assignment on the circuitous routing, the charge for such service shall include a mileage charge administratively determined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and travel tolls, if applicable, or such travel prorated among all the applicants and certifying agents furnished the service involved on an equitable basis or, when the travel is made by public transportation (including hired vehicles), a fee equal to the actual cost thereof.

Another example: Coquelin is clearly great, yet because they heard so former player earn his keep by criticizing him (Thierry Henry sadly lowered himself to that level recently) they «know» he's not a good player and must be replaced (it's even worse because he didn't cost 50 million in transfer fees so that they'd know he was good as it's well - known that the more expensive the fee, the better the player [cough] DiMaria [cough] Falcao [cough]-RRB-.

Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.

At the end of his contract he moves to another club who will not have to pay transfer fees so will hav more money to pay him.

To make Poldi more attractive to teams financially you have to slash the fee so they can spend that on his wages.

We are still a club with no benefactor to bankroll us so the books have to be balanced.That is a way of life that we must live with and accept.But from now on there can be little or no excuses in the players we buy.Wengers control in these matters have been taken from him so the emphasis and accountability lies with Ivan Gazidis and his new teams.We can't get things wrong.Big and better players cost more in fees and wages so it's certainlg going to be interesting.

2 we agreed the 92m fee as long as city spent more on Alexis which they did nt so we pulled the plug - ormenstine

So although Higuain or any other player might cost a little bit more than double Wellbexks # 16 million fee they would still deliver double the goals and would perhaps be the difference between us finishing 3rd to 1st?

If it's all up front and above board, well then that is terrible reading, why skimp on our transfer fees whilst we dish out more wages than the so called plastics.

Arsenal had been negotiating with Basel for the last 8 months for Elneny and his transfer fee is said to be more than the reported fee (# 7 million) the true cost is kept between the two clubs so that Basel don't get held to ransom when they enter the swiss market to buy players.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

You replace the older Gen with a younger Gen, Cazorla will be replaced eventually and the club as a business would benefit more from a large fee so the budget for the potential replacement can be bigger.

Sanctioning bodies charge a % of the purse from fighters, so a fighter making $ 10 million for a fight will pay more in fees than a fighter making $ 1million.

Try taking more of his so - called Management Fee with no results to show, he got ta prepare to see more fans walk out on him.

Stan Kroenke has widely been criticised for his business mentality in making a profit, so it would be adventurous to deny that there was zero chance of us selling, but surely his worth to our team is more than # 50 Million, and demanding that sort of fee for a full - back would be a record for his position.

I am not convinced that Evans is the answer, but he does have bags of Premier League as well as Champions League experience from his time at Old Trafford and the transfer fee would not be in the ridiculous realms we are hearing about the likes of Mustafi and Gimenez, so do you think Wenger will make his transfer interest more concrete?