Not exact matches
How does his work compare with
more recent
figurative painters dealing with psycho - sexual
content?
Although he continued to promote abstract work produced in Britain and throughout Europe, Sylvester believed at this time that
figurative art «was capable of going further... that [it] could be
more complex,
more specific, richer in human
content».18 By 1958, however, Sylvester had undergone what he later described as a «Damascene conversion'to the profound achievements of recent American abstraction.
Though seemingly disparate, these genres are all linked by a vibrant community, multiple stylistic allegiances, and a return to the expressive possibilities of
figurative and representational
content, driven by a
more populist sensibility.
Well, that just throws up so many questions; but I'll merely say that looking at a great deal of old
figurative painting, from Giotto to Matisse, seems a lot
more real and a lot less rhetorical than the experience of looking at Stella, particularly if you define «rhetorical» as something designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect, but which lacks meaningful
content.
He ventures that
figurative painting allows for
more - diverse cultural
content — clothing, skin color, setting — than abstraction ever can.
His wit at creating
figurative tensions in the symbolic
content of the larger allegories discretely steps aside to allow for his greater painterly literalness to flourish in these
more diminutive works.