Sentences with phrase «more financial games»

The more financial games you and your spouse play with each other, the more you will likely pay in taxes, penalties, accounting fees, lost earnings and lost financial opportunities.

Not exact matches

Virtually none of the game players started out with more than a couple of certified public accountants, M.B.A.'s, and other financial sophisticates on their payrolls.

The latter is the «keep some skin in the game» principle, the idea that if you can't dump all the risk on someone else, you'll be more careful about the quality of the financial products you're selling.

More from Investor Toolkit: Advisors turn to life coaches and counselors Retirees leave $ 100B in Social Security benefits on table Ring in 2018 with a new financial game plan

More from College Game Plan: Student loan balances hit record $ 1.4 trillion The first steps to repaying your student debt Three ways to avoid the financial death spiral of defaulting on your student loans

More from College Game Plan: College applicants are increasingly stressed over paying the tab The top 10 private colleges with generous financial aid packages Want more college More from College Game Plan: College applicants are increasingly stressed over paying the tab The top 10 private colleges with generous financial aid packages Want more college more college aid?

More importantly, the game's financial success finally allowed Capy to break free of its work - for - hire subsistence.

It applies to the economic or professional activities of a wide range of persons, including credit and financial institutions, organizers of games of chance, intermediaries in transactions with real property, traders in transactions involving more than $ 15,000 or its equivalent, pawnbrokers, precious metals and stones traders, auditors, providers of trust and company services, and non-profit associations and foundations.

The organization had never consciously withheld its numbers — financial information was tacked up for employees to see — but when cofounders Ari Weinzweig and Paul Saginaw studied open book management in the mid-1990s, they came to believe that employees would show more interest if they got involved in the «game.»

And then there is the game in the stock exchanges of the financial markets, global speculation, more than 2,000 billion dollars is exchanged every day and scarcely 5 % represents the real economy.

We ALL agree, Wenger did get a few duds in the last few years, I believe that was more to do with the financial restraints, but, the likes of Senderos, much maligned on here is part of the Swiss team, and, had a great game at the week = end.

It would also be an introduction of the Giants as a major financial force in the game: San Francisco hasn't been cheap up until this point, but they haven't been considered the kind of team that could dish out $ 30 million or more per year to a single player, either.

to me we are just watching the inevitable consequences of a bursting football bubble which is what AFC (Arsenal Financial Corporation) has become under the Franco American alliance... to be honest its lasted longer than I expected as the signs of a Ponzi club were visible 5 years ago but somehow the 4th place zombie fans kept the thing going longer than I expected but the bust is, consequently, even more worrisome for the long term health of the club... obviously Wenger should have gone 5 years back but that was not in the interest of the vulture owner... next steps are uncertain but I hope fans show their disgust by not showing up to the emirates next game

After throwing for 371 yards in Sunday's comeback win overthe Eagles, he now has more career 300 - yard games in Lincoln Financial Field (two) than he has in Giants Stadium (none).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Each game is now a must win as the season draws towards its conclusion and the financial ramification of relegation are more harrowing than ever.

«Clubs, fans and other stakeholders in the game are demanding a more rational financial approach and this reinforces our conviction that our Club is strongly placed to succeed over the long term, We have qualified for the Champions League for the 15th season in a row whilst off the pitch we have a business strategy and infrastructure that is helping us to grow our revenues.»

Unfortunately, the Department of Financial Services seems more interested in playing political games, so remains unaware of actions taken by what is one of the best managed and best funded public pension funds in the country.

The authors say game design elements — such as points, levels, and badges — and financial incentives may have contributed to the sustained use of the devices, but the results provide valuable insights for wellness programs, insurance companies, and other program designers who should consider testing new and more targeted engagement strategies to motivate older and lower - income populations.

If one of your 2016 goals was to become more financially savvy, consider recommitting to a weekly financial podcast or reading strategy to up your game in the personal finance department.

Just as everyone knows that a man who has a big fortune is more competitive in the dating game — they can make women be more confident in their ability to provide luxury life and financial support.

The game can be a sweeping financial success, moving tens of millions of copies and raking vastly more money than its budget and still fall short of 90 million copies and $ 6 billion in revenue.

Zelnick explained that the company has always prided itself on the quality of their games, and that the excellence they strive for is more important than the speed with which they release their titles, or financial concerns for that matter.

Financial backers that pledge $ 15 or more will receive copies of the game upon release.

Obviously the studio has some experience behind them, and while I can't comment on their financial position, you'd like to think that with so many games, and with Psychonauts being as successful as it was, that they'd have some more money behind them to fund it themselves.

Once - high - flying Weinstein Co., which used to know better than anyone how to play the indie game, is experiencing ongoing financial duress during these changing times, and focusing more on television.

Capcom's become increasingly cagey about its fighting games lineup over the past few years of financial squeeze but looking at Marvel vs Capcom Infinite's leaked roster makes it more than clear why at least one of its beloved franchises is ready to pup a sequel: the Marvel Cinematic Universe is an incredible important license right now.

«We're careful not to put too large of a forecast in there,» Jorgensen said at their quarterly financial briefing, «and clearly [Anthem] will impact this year as well as next year as we not only continue to sell more into the next year but as we start rolling out the live services associated with that game.»

In the second installment of this series, guest blogger Brian Page offers three more financial literacy resources, this time focusing on an educational site and two online games to engage middle schoolers in understanding personal finances.

Yes, that is a fair point, but educators should not see this as a zero - sum game, where more financial education will necessarily take something away from the rigor, focus and coherence that is needed to give students strong foundations in mathematics or reading.

It's just that in these times, if you're buying new, it takes more of a financial commitment to get in the minivan game.

And, more importantly, what will be the response of those with financial clout (and a stake in the game)?

Given the culture that we live in today, more and more lending companies care more about a clean credit report and a portrayal of a dedicated financial game plan than anything else.

Recognizing how that game changes as you start to earn more will help you make the most of your financial success.

Lewis Mandell, a SUNY - Buffalo professor and a leading scholar in financial education, says that this kind of activity is more like a game: kids may be engaged, but they're not actually aware of the risks.

Nice work if you can get it... Top management & directors should be ashamed of creating / permitting such a financial environment — but I guess they're playing their own, more sophisticated, version of this game for themselves.

Just before Christmas, John Authers of the Financial Times, in a piece entitled «Investment: Loser's Game» argued that this year, with more than 90 % of active managers on track to underperform their benchmarks, a tipping point may have finally been reached.

High Default Rates - The last economic downturn revealed that borrowers with no «skin in the game» or financial interest in their home were more likely to default, not pay or late their mortgage, and walk away from their home than those with down payments - even in cases where down payment was made and signifcant losses in property value were experienced.

Interestingly, the skin - in - the - game effect can lead to overly optimistic advice in the world of more traditional financial planning.

Reaching financial independence is, more than anything, a waiting game.

The target was set not for financial reasons, the Lionhead boss explained during a talk given at GDC today, but rather to see how much the numerous changes implemented in the third game — Fable III is moving away from being a more traditional RPG and is turning into a more of an action adventure title — will affect its popularity among consumers.

Why would third parties want to take more of a financial hit on a console that they're not even certain their type of games will sell well on.

From the console constantly selling out and reports of games being ported to it, selling more copies on Switch compared to other platforms, and Nintendo's latest financial results revealing just how popular their million seller titles are, the Switch is even more of a success than most would realize.»

Easy Rules strips back complexities for a more accessible game of financial one - upmanship, while the standard regulations see the board split into districts, introducing stock options that allow you to rake in money for areas you might not own.

In practice this means that European game developer studios have to pay more from their own financial resources before receiving reimbursement from the Commission.

Not much is known about if / when 2D Boy will release a new game, with efforts centred on Goo and its ports, plus more general philanthropic work for the rest of the industry — last year, inspired by their successes in indie games, 2D Boy and thatgamecompany teamed up to start the «Indie Fund» to offer financial support for new studios.

«This scholarship means I can focus less on my financial situation and more on my school work, internship, and personal game design endeavors.

From a financial perspective and cost of capital perspective, it makes sense for Atari to try and test some new sources of funding to see if these sources could be available down the road for more games.

Steam also has more financial upside for game developers.

Nintendo's recent financial briefing reveals a few more details on what gamers can expect come the release of the Switch in March.