Sentences with phrase «more financial sense if»

Large beach house rentals often make more financial sense if you are vacationing with a large group of people.

I agree with the logic laid out in the article, but it's worth pointing out that owning a home can quickly make much more financial sense if you plan to rent out one or more rooms.

Not exact matches

While it doesn't always make strictly rational financial sense — if you have a 3.5 percent mortgage but can earn 7 or 8 percent from investing, putting extra money towards your mortgage does result in opportunity cost — the emotional impact could more than offset that «loss.»

However, if you have high interest rates and could benefit most from refinancing and saving money, a private loan might make more financial sense.

If you can earn 5 % or more from stocks, an IRA, or 401 (k), it doesn't make financial sense to pay off your mortgage early.

In a world that is normalizing, it would make sense that company behavior would normalize back toward a more balanced use of cash — especially if the days of super easy money and financial arbitrage are over.

He said that more people would be successful in financial sense if they managed their home expenses differently.

Still, Walther, who has been in the financial services industry for more than 25 years, senses a fundamental underlying change even if the current generation of guaranteed income products will need more refining before RIAs bite down hard.

For example, if you are behind in retirement savings, or do not have a cash emergency reserve, it may make more sense to put your newfound funds towards those financial goals while you continue to pay off a mortgage with attractive terms.

On the other hand, if you plan to stay put for a while, buying a home in California might make more sense from both a financial and a lifestyle perspective.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

In addition, if you're traveling to a destination you're going to visit often (like grandma's house), it may make even more financial sense to buy a cheap pack - n - play just for your destination, as Leslie Neeland Harvey of Trips With Tykes has pointed out.

If you don't cover long distances, a petrol car could make more financial sense.

If there are sectors of society that, say for financial reasons, could not buy books, it would make more sense for the taxpayer and ratepayer to subsidise their book purchases than to pay for an expensive library system whose main purpose is to give the books away.

While it can be more difficult to save up a down payment and qualify for a mortgage if you have significant student loan debt, before you give up on your dream of owning a home sooner rather than later, sit down with a calculator or a financial planner to see if it makes financial sense to buy a home now.

If renting is more expensive, than it makes financial sense to stay in the house.

If the caps were lower it might make sense to try an ARM, but with a cap spreading over 5 % or more there is significant financial risk.

If you are fiercely loyal to Virgin America, then getting a more general card makes little financial sense.

If exercising doesn't make financial sense within a contract's term, you can always roll over the contract to lock in more time (by selling your current contract and buying a new one with a later expiration date).

For example, if you are maxed out at your operational capacity and turning down orders or falling behind on them, then utilizing a merchant cash advance to increase your operational capacity — and generate more revenue than you otherwise would — makes financial sense.

If you are considering a home purchase (either as a first time buyer or move - up buyer), purchasing sooner rather than later may make more sense from a pure financial outlook.

If you live in a market that has many foreign homebuyers or professionals with more income than financial sense, buying may not be a good idea.

The more I thought about it, the more it made sense — even if this trend ultimately proved a bust, financial institutions, like nature, abhor a vacuum: if they see an opportunity they will (eventually) rush in... something to exploit in the meantime.

If you have the financial ability, you might wonder whether it makes sense to put down more than 20 % for a down payment.

Even if you've found the perfect home at a great price, it often makes far more financial sense to wait until your credit and other finances are in order than to jump at the first good opportunity.»

Working with a trustworthy financial professional will give you a good understanding of whether an annuity should have a place in your investment portfolio or if another strategy makes more sense.

This whole thing is crazy if it makes more financial sense for me to not work at all!

If their proposal is going to run 5 years doesn't it make more sense to check in on a regular basis to see that their financial behavior has changed?

If you plan on owning the car longer than 3 years, it almost always makes more financial sense to buy.

If you have other high - interest - rate debt, it might make more financial sense to pay that off first.

See the average sales price of a newly constructed house and see if building a home makes more financial sense for you than buying an existing home.

From a financial perspective and cost of capital perspective, it makes sense for Atari to try and test some new sources of funding to see if these sources could be available down the road for more games.

If true, this means that we should immediately make big efforts to make sure that our existing natural gas infrastructure is as leak - proof as possible (something that is no doubt already done because it makes financial sense, but it can't hurt to be extra diligent), and we should be very careful about switching more transportation to natural gas.

Another possibility is that it could make more financial sense to invest the money rather than immediately pay off the loan if your mortgage is locked into a very low interest rate.

If your teen drives an older model car that isn't financed, it might make more financial sense to skip these optional coverage types.

Now, if you need a plan for longer than one year it may make more financial sense to get a 10 - year term instead since you'll lock in that rate for a longer time.

You can research the average price of a desk, and then determine if it makes more financial sense for you to file a claim for damaged desks or save on your premium by paying for the desks yourself.

If your claim is only a little more than the amount of your deductible, it might make better financial sense to go ahead and pay for the repairs out of pocket, saving the insurance for more costly incidents and keeping your CLUE score as low as possible.

«If we're close to completing a foreclosure, though, it makes more financial sense to take the property back,» says Charles Krawitz, senior sales manager of the loan asset disposition group at Fifth Third Bank in Cincinnati.

If the effective interest rate (after taking into account the interest deduction) that you're paying on your mortgage is 3 % — 4.5 % and you can earn 5 % or more from your investments then it doesn't make financial sense to payoff your mortgage.

It solves so many problems first time investors have... if they're willing to live with their tenants in the neighborhoods where it makes financial sense to buy these properties (more on that soon).