Sentences with phrase «more fit because»

Not exact matches

While you would like to have a star with a high Q - score, keep in mind that these people tend to cost more (because they are more popular, more familiar stars) and it may not necessarily be a good fit for your brand.

Because the outdoor gear retailer discourages staff from working more than 50 hours a week and tends to attract active, fit employees, «my hunch is sleep deprivation isn't as much an issue here,» says public affairs manager Tim Southam.

The more likely culprit is unconscious bias, a set of assumptions that cause recruiters or managers to overlook candidates because they don't fit their mental model of the ideal employee.

On the other hand, some say that Dimon more or less threw a fit, lashing out publicly because he has lost an important argument behind closed doors.

Constellation has also talked about its «premiumization» strategy when it comes to beer, and Boston Beer would fit into that because it generates more revenue per hectoliter than most of the world's top brewers.

Because fitness and nutrition is constantly evolving and we want to keep everyone healthy and fit, we also offer new YouTube workout videos, healthy recipes, fitness tips much more on our blog to help keep your routine fresh.

Credit Lewis's expertise, because when the pants came back, they fit perfectly in the waist, and I'd never had a more perfect taper without having alterations after the second fitting.

It also allows me to focus more on more stressful challenges I may face at work because I am not necessarily trying to fit them in «before the clock» and if I come up with an idea during an off hour I can try it out.

This type of coverage also would fit into David Meerman Scott's newsjacking model — but probably attract more press coverage than newsjacking format # 2 because it is a unique opinion.

Because seminarians have been trained by theologians who are more shaped by their graduate school training than by their ecclesial identification — they see themselves as process thinkers or Barthians rather than as Baptists or Episcopalians — we have seminarians who attempt to make congregations fit the images of their theological allegiances rather than trying to respond to the theological resources of the congregation.

I have even declined the opportunity to be more involved in some progressive Christian events, because labels like Emergent and Progressive do not reflect my theological positions and do not always FIT with how I see or practice faith.

nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.

Jesus does indeed fit the basic definition of a zombie, I think you just reject the notion because of the stigma attached to the word zombie isn't normally something you hear when you think of jesus, which is why atheists and non-christians in general like to call jesus a zombie, it makes him more mythical than divine.

More should speak out against ignorance and those who would suppress select knowledge because it does not fit with a belief system to which one might subscribe.

Because the Roman Catholics wanted it to fit in with the pagan celebrations so they would be more interested in practicing their form of Christianity.

This is a shame, not only because of the feelings of frustration and inadequacy it can cause people like me, who don't fit the devotional mold, but also because Jesus showed He was more than capable of loving and ministering to both of these spiritual styles.

Although more people could fit into the house if they stood, they will not stand, because they want to be in the position of authority.

You're not seeing me asking if you give up all of your riches just because Jesus said that it was more difficult for one having many possessions to get into heaven than for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle.

But we have our own purity codes these days — people we cast out from our communities or surround with Bible - wielding mobs, labels we assign to those who don't fit, conditions we place on God's grace, theological and behavioral checklists we hand out before baptism or communion, sins real or imagined we delight in taking seriously because we'd like to think they are much more severe than our own.

Neo-Darwinism at present holds the ascendancy in the eyes of biologists, partly owing to a clearer and more statistically substantiated definition of «the fittest», but principally because of the immense part, now recognized by modern genetics, played by the «action of large numbers» in the formation of species.

If you are happy with one of the parties that presently exist, you can be a bore and say why — though I would hope people could be a bit more imaginative, because let's face it, the Democrats are a 1930s paradigm that fits in about as well as a zoot suit, and the Republicans are so splintered they seem to be an illusion of a viewpoint rather than the reality of it.

We want people to fit our stereotypes because it makes them more manageable.

But many people embrace some restrictions without the faintest idea why, mostly because they perceive them as the cool thing du jour, and often switch them without warning to make them fit into the more - recent - model cool thing du jour.

We don't have that many fancy kitchen appliances, mainly because we can't fit anything more into our small kitchen.

I had such a hard time naming these tbh because they are much richer than a pudding and almost more «set» like a pie but yet not in a crust... but I think «pots» fits.

Dannon Light and Fit is pretty magical because it helps make muffins soft and tender while keeping them oil - free and more figure - friendly.

Like one bite here because that container is just a little too full, and just onnne more bite on the way to the fridge to make sure the lid will fit... and the only way I can stop is by reminding myself I want to actually have leftovers to enjoy the next day.

Like one bite here because that container is just a little too full, and just onnne more bite on the way to the fridge to make sure the lid will fit, and then pop the corner on the container for just one more little taste once it's actually in the fridge, and then I better have a few more bites to even out all the containers because we have to be fair...

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

More than how he fits with the Angels, though, he's an interesting player because of his pending free agency.

He is very crucial for us and also we didn't have much defenders for back - up if some one goes out for long period of time... It should not happen, but if Debuchy is out for more weeks we should change our formation too 3 defenders i.e like of Netherland, because losing one more defender with already defender one out will bring us with atmost 1 defender as back - up... So, lets hope Debuchy is fit for next BPL game...

Mate, I will be more than happy to apologise and swallow my comments regarding Wilshere... No problems... I do not believe I will have to, but I would be more than willing to do so... He needs to stay fit (which I don't believe he will just because of the way he plays) and perform with consistence (I don't think he can reach another level... Just hoping I am wrong).

And even though it looks like those injury issues are easing and there is a good chance the Ox may find himself on the bench more often, the England international is over the moon to see the likes of Walcott, Giroud and Debuchy coming back, because he reckons that with a fitter squad, Arsenal will be ready to really push on after christmas and put the iffy first half of the season behind us.

Perhaps even more interesting is that two weeks ago the team at Sports Insights sent out the Kansas City Chiefs (+11.5) as a Best Bet against the previously undefeated Green Bay Packers, largely because they fit into this historically profitable contrarian play.

But because I just don't believe Jack will ever be fit for more than a month sell him.

he didn't so much has at Borough at season and I think personal the reason he started a head if holding was because he was much fitter and played more regular last season....

People are saying Lemar is worth that because they are considering how he will be long term.He's very good at creating chances and key passes.As for Mahrez I would like Wenger to bring him in because I feel we need a left footed right winger with quality.The guy has cutting edge and is very good at creating a lot of chances and scoring.They are both different kind of players and I believe we should be happy with any of them.Currently, Mahrez is the better and more experienced of the two considering all factors but Lemar can be a great player.Their stype of play also fit Arsenal perfectly.

So because Theo and Welbz wasn't fully fit Giroud had to play more games... now Theo is fit and Welbz should be fit for start of season and we are going to buy yet ANOTHER cf?

From a personal perspective, I'm not sure if I would have preferred Bacca over Lucas Perez anyway, because although Bacca is arguably more experienced and more established at a higher level of European football, Perez did have a fantastic season last year and if he is able to replicate his 17 goal tally in La Liga in the Premier League, then he should have no problems fitting in with the Gunners.

sczecny debuchy chambers kosielny monreal flamini Ramsey Sanchez cazorla ox lade giroud chambers instead of per because he is more match fit cazorla is more match fit than ozil so he should start giroud has more movement, strength and has a bigger chance of creating a shot for ramsey, cazorla or sanchez than sanogo.

so all they need to do is show up, PLEASE the manager and they are safe too, no matter how bad results are, the one thing that matters to them is PLEASING the untouchable man and they can keep getting their fat weekly cheques whilst flopping on the field... a new manager will gut half of this squad because frankly they are not fit foe purpose... its even more annoying when you see how open this year's league is and how ita possible foe them to win it even as useless and spineless as they are, but we really underestimate just how gutless and totally useless and spineless these eternal losers are....

What would fit more in line with your opinions of Arsene Wenger would be if you were saying or replying that you are not bothered by the transfer market one iota because it doesn't matter how many new faces arrive as Arsene is incapable of reaching the summit.

Although Kos is getting more and more injuries, we know if he can play then he will fight to make himself fit to do so, part of the reason why we love him is because he is so dedicated to AFC.

I do not think nearly so well about our ill - fitting and much more expensive trio of Jackson, Griffin, and Drummond, and I really can not understand the argument that because Griffin is a better player than Harris, this trio will automatically be better than that which it proceeded.

Perhaps the price has gone up because an injured player more closely fits our typical player profile.

Arteta is being kept because he is capable of fitting in against weaker opposition, he is also a great influence in the dressing room, and from what iv heard helps the youngsters more than anyone, im also sure i heard he speaks like 7 languages which is useful.

Staying fit is a massive issue for our injury hit star, we all know that and probably nobody more than the player himself, but he must be feeling good about his impact off the bench in a tough game against Cologne because I am and I can not help but wonder what will happen from now on.

Also, if Ramsey were fit, I'd definitely have him in my first eleven... Ramsey could not play with Coquelin at the base of midfield because until most recently, he needed to have a ball carrier right next to him right after winning the ball and in most cases Ramsey was always very far from him but Cazorla is far more disciplined in positioning hence why «Coqzorla» works so well however with Xhaka, its quite different because he can carry and distribute his own balls and frees Ramsey up to roam which is where he thrives best, it is no coincidence that Ramsey had his best season playing with Arteta but while Arteta could also carry and distribute his own balls he is no ball winner like Xhaka or Coquelin.

yeah, would rather have played Flamini because he more much fit than Ramsey and am very sure Rosicsky would have done better.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste