Sentences with phrase «more focused attacks»

Place your cursor on them for an extra half second and you unleash a more focused attack from whichever ranged weapon you chose when the demo began (Orb, Claw, or Blades).

Not exact matches

It's the idea that by developing strict procedures and guidelines and sticking to them, you will actually benefit from a freedom to focus more clearly on the objective at hand, rather than how you're going to attack it.

The Air Force plans keep the A-10 Thunderbolt, the force's premier close - air - support platform, in service, but a light - attack aircraft would allow high - end fighters like the F - 16 to focus on more complex missions.

Though the US Navy has far more submarines in active service both in SSBN's and attack submarines, the Russian Navy's recent moves and its newest submarine plans, show a sign of changing strategy, with a new focus placed on challenging the US Navy's dominance — particularly underwater.

He didn't attack that meetings week directly, but the slog suddenly grew much more productive as execs started using it to focus on more pressing initiatives.

With these security breaches happening more and more frequently, major corporations are becoming increasingly focused on security measures to prevent these attacks from happening.

Wildrose MLAs will likely focus their energy attacking the carbon levy and calling for more oil pipelines, but will the official opposition defy the radical climate change deniers in their own ranks and present a policy alternative to the NDP's Climate Leadership Plan?

He desired to hear more, and the important point to note is that St Francis did not directly attack the tenets of Islam, but rather focused on expounding the Christian Gospel.

Our structure focuses more on attacking than defending.»

And the fact that we would be denying Liverpool and Brendan Rodgers another of his transfer targets would make it even sweeter, but I just wonder whether it would not be more proof that Wenger is too focused on the attacking side of the game when we desperately need a defender and a proper defensive midfielder.

However, Rodgers is tactically smart and changing his style is probably the more likely option, with Daniel Sturridge as the focus in attack and a unit of exciting attacking midfielders being him.

Arsenal has always focused on attack more than defense so saying to not forget the attacking side of the game is silly, because we've always been an attacking team.

Your right I think, if we can get decent holding CM to help protect the back 4 then Ozil and Co will be able to focus on attacking more often, how - ever I will highlight how little effort Ozil puts in to winning the ball back For me Cazorla would be the starter because I have more confidence in him in getting back and winning the ball back with the TEAM and help us press higher up to force the opposition into making mistakes and letting in goals.

Arteta played (in his earlier days) quite a few games for us with an attacking focus, and always looked more comfortable their than in defensive roles.

He can still do everything, but he's found the right balance between all - out domination and more focused streams of attack.

Secondary tasks of any DM: succesfully take on other defensive challenges to provide other midfielders to focus on attacking more.

It could suit us to a certain extent as Everton won't be able to exploit our possession game as much and we can focus more on counter attacking with mobile players.

With all this in mind it appears that even more focus than usual will be on the creative, attacking and scoring side of Arsenal's game, with the Eagles likely to sit back and soak up the pressure while hoping for a breakaway goal.

This is EPL wenger should try and focus more on defence, our system is too much of attack whereas there is no superstar to do the magic, we only base on fast pass tempo, a well organized team, just need to keep the ball from us, play from the back, slow down the tempo and we are well beating.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.

With Arsenal having so far during the current season further increased our reputation for playing fluent and attractive football that is often more focused on the creative and attacking side of the game, you might think that the Arsenal players most likely to have made the Premier League team of the season so far would be from that side of the team.

Hopefully at least one of these rumours are true and they do seem to be focused on the attacking side of things, so has Wenger accepted that Arsenal need more firepower to win the title?

ramsey is a good payer when he decides to remain disciplined less greedy and focus more on creating chances and filling our midfield with his presence and providing eergy for both attacks and defense, remember he is a complete midfielder.

A player will not change our fortunes — we have enough quality in the team if the manager does not force people to play out of their positions and if the players do their job — Next match Arsenal should just focus on shutting shop at Liverpool and go for a cleansheet — the midfield needs to be told to focus on disrupting more and just give the ball to ozil / Sanchez — just sit back and stop attacks.

They have struggled to attack down the middle in the last few game and having 3 at the back afford Morrow and VdW / Auro much more freedom to attack down the wings and Bradley freedom to not act like a CB and focus on starting the attack.

In hockey, for example, some teams will dump and chase, and others prefer to build up an attack with shorter passes; in baseball, some teams bunt a lot, and others are more focused on moving runners along with base hits.

Then Coquelin focused more on defending and Cazorla more on attacking.

I am starting my boycott by not watching this team or buying any merchandise if only us fans were more objective and serious about our team it wouldnt be 11 years and counting that we are not even be considered as genuine title contenders even crystal palace and Swansea city seems to be more aggressive and focus than arsenal I hope none of you all gets a heart attack after the window closes and we make a panic buy and sign Mahrez from Leicester this is such a stupidly run club

Lampard was talking about Ramsey and saying that although he is impressed with the talent and attacking intent that Rambo showed in his two starts back in the central position vacated by the injury hit Santi Cazorla, he feels that the Arsenal star needs to focus more on the defensive side of things, especially in games against bigger teams like Man City.

It's hardly as if this is alien to Liverpool — they've done it a number of times this season, but far more often, the team focusses on attacking centrally, rather than using wide spaces.

Yes, of course, we as fans would like to win them but more important is that the team are primed, focussed and ready to attack the playoff's head on.

The days of Catenaccio are a distant memory in Italian football as the modern game has shifted its focus to a more open and attacking style of play.

He's a bit more Johan Djourou than Nemanja Vidic in the way that he attacks the ball, but has excellent European experience and consistently stands out in a Werder Bremen side that focuses on defending about as much as Arsenal do.

This means Hoolahan takes up more deeper, central positions, and plays frequent balls to the wings to start attacks, rather than being the focus of those attacks himself.

Sure he had some exceptional attributes but no one player should be the focus of every attacking move and there is now (at least on the evidence of the last two games) far more of a collective teamwork ethic on show.

While those question marks remain, with the transfer activity mainly focusing on attacking options so far, the defense for the opening day has even more question marks with Pontuss Jansson suspended for the first two games of the season, the opening match at Bolton and the League Cup match against Port Vale.

Both Liverpool and Arsenal shared a number of similarities in their attacking play in this match, but Liverpool's setup was more akin to a counter-attacking side (46.5 pc possession), as you would expect, likewise, Arsenal's attacking style focussed on overloads out wide in forward positions — whereas Liverpool attempted to create overloads in situations in order to exploit and expose the midfield from deep:

Traditionally, one of the pairing at the base of midfield in a 4 -2-3-1 is more attack minded and the other is defensively focussed.

It seems like the game is slowly moving away from the traditional striker and towards the more loosely - defined «forward» as the focus of attacking play.

I think there needs to be more focus on such things as this and not on attacking ONE woman, who IS educated in natural child birthing methods and blaming her for infant deaths.

At the last Spending Review, George Osborne attacked those who urged a more balanced plan and a greater focus on supporting economic growth, saying this alternative course:

Eichenwald shot back, saying the book was complimentary of Bush, and that a more focused understanding of the intelligence failures leading up to the attacks is necessary.

When the victim called the police, she said their focus seemed to be more on her activities as a sex worker than the attack itself.

That freedom of movement — which has been so beneficial to our economy here in the UK — is often the focus of attack by other parties, but we celebrate it and call on the government to do more to ensure that it works for everyone.»

«Instead of unleashing more desperate, unhinged attacks on charities for low - income New Yorkers, Andrew Cuomo should focus on cleaning up the corrupt cesspool he's presided over in Albany, and return every dollar of the millions in conservative, corporate money he's gobbled up.»

As to the why behind Cuomo's evolving and more nationally - focused attacks, perhaps the apparent national Republican electoral wave is a factor.

Ad No. 2, which is also running on cable stations in the district, is a bit more traditional, focusing on a tried - and - true GOP line of attack to which over-taxed Long Island residents are no doubt extra sensitive.

The left of centre parties, that attacked those focussing on immigration controls and challenged UKIP's racism, advanced more than Labour at the election.

Gianaris» platform focuses on fighting pollution from power plants, preventing terrorism and attacks by sexual predators and consumer protection for airline passengers, while Arcabascio's campaign focuses on job creation, more hospitals, deregulation of insurance companies and education reform.