Sentences with phrase «more for taking on this risk»

Not exact matches

For one, investors are going to have to get comfortable taking on more risk in their equity portfolios by buying stocks at higher valuations.
And that will require investors to adjust their strategy and their expectations henceforward — by paying more for equities, taking on more risk with fixed income and socking away more than they used to.
While investors will have to find stocks with higher yields, pay more for them and take on more risk in bonds, the biggest change in a permanently low - rate world is that people will need to set aside more of every paycheque if they want to keep the same goal for retirement income.
«On the other hand, I wouldn't mind offering equity as a reward for taking risk out of the business by bringing in three or four more customers and diversifying the customer base.
«As hackers devise more advanced and less recognizable threats, organizations that continue to settle for cybersecurity strategies that rely on a «feeling» of security are taking even greater risks in the coming year.»
For long - term goals that are 10, 20 or 30 years out, you do want to take on more risk.
More from the CFO Council: Trump's tariff proposal, trade war will be bad for both US and China: CNBC Survey Companies are taking action on gun control because politicians won't: CNBC Survey There's been an «overreaction» in Thai stocks to trade - war risks, says exchange executive
«If you are just buying income and not paying attention to the valuations, you are probably taking on more risk than you bargained for,» says Brad Kinkelaar, head of the dividend team at Pimco.
On the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yeaOn the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yeaon more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad year.
For example, some investors may have taken on more risk in their portfolios in recent years by moving into lower - quality bonds or dividend stocks, in an attempt to generate additional yield.
Mr. Francois, 49, on the job at Chrysler for 15 months, is gaining a reputation among his ad agencies, dealers and staff for surprising them and taking the kinds of risks that make them feel more confident than they ever did while owned by German carmaker Daimler or private - equity firm Cerberus Capital.
Whether you are willing to take on a little more risk with your investments, or if you would rather play it safe, there's probably an option for you.
Potenza: As the yield curve flattens, investors get less compensation for moving further out on the curve and taking on more duration risk.
Private lenders are looking for the same information and will conduct similar due diligence as the banks, but they typically specialize in an industry and are more willing to take on higher - risk loans if they see the potential.
On the contrary, I will argue that you should start searching for — not taking, mind you — more risks, because engaging risks will lead you to new market opportunities.
For example, if you're comfortable taking on more risk in exchange for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bonFor example, if you're comfortable taking on more risk in exchange for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bonfor potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bonds.
And I warned at a number of junctures in 1999 before the Internet bubble, and again in the winter of 2007, that the main thing we had to fear was the lack of fear itself, precisely because a sense that everything is stable is a self - denying prophecy, because if there is a sense that everything is stable, -LSB-...] people will take on more risk and that will then create the conditions for future instability.
An investor saving for retirement may be comfortable taking on more risk than an investor saving for a down payment.
It is a trend that is only set to accelerate as policy measures such as the recommendations from the Taskforce for Climate - related Financial Discosures and new green finance rules from the UK and EU start to take effect and require firms to disclose more information on the climate risks they face.
This very low market volatility can lead investors to take on more risk, and in a period of still relatively low interest rates, to «reach for yield» — that is, buy riskier assets than one would otherwise, in order to achieve a desired profit or savings goal.
However, if you want the potential for more reward by taking on more risk, then you can consider KITE or JUNO.
For the past six months, markets have certainly embraced taking on more risk.
An easy way to remember this is that for taking on more risk, you should demand a higher yield and use a higher discount rate.
For the investor willing to take on slightly more risk for slightly more yield, SLQD is a very attractive optiFor the investor willing to take on slightly more risk for slightly more yield, SLQD is a very attractive optifor slightly more yield, SLQD is a very attractive option.
As a result of the likely move into negative real returns on cash, more cash savers will move into UK government bonds (gilts), more gilt owners will swap them for corporate bonds, some more will move into equities, and a sliver of risk - takers will use cheaper financing to start businesses or take out loans to build property.
If market internals improve, we'll take a signal that investors have shifted back to risk - seeking, and that would ease our near - term concerns, but wouldn't materially change our expectations for a market loss on the order of 50 % or more over the completion of the current cycle.
In recent issues of The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor I've covered the U.S. government's ongoing «War on Cash»... how our government is trying to take over the Internet with the latest push for «net neutrality»... the risks and advantages of digital currency like bitcoin... how U.S. banks are preparing for «bail - ins» during the next financial crisis... how the U.S. government is using Common Core to indoctrinate children so they'll submit to the coming socialist society... and much, much more.
As you round the bend toward retirement, it's not a good idea to take on any more investment risk than necessary for your time frame, financial circumstances, and risk tolerance.
Individual lenders might be able to take on a little more risk, so credit requirements for peer - to - peer loans are usually more flexible.
For his master's thesis on investment management, Jon showed how university endowments can generate more wealth (and take on less risk) by adopting low - cost investment strategies.
I think most investors would be wise to take a more conservative posture at this point, and be willing to give up some upside for a while... just depends on how much relative performance risk you can stomach.
Well, economists like to make the case for more emphasis on consumption taxation relative to income taxes, which can have incentive effects on work effort, savings and risk taking.
The reason for this is that currently investors tend not to take risks but to rely more on logic and projects» implementation evaluations.
It can be unpleasant for entrepreneurs with a more solid financial base to discover that they are required to take on more risk than some of their peers.
Fidelity ® Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX) This fund might be appropriate for investors looking for higher yield who are willing to take on more credit risk while limiting interest rate risk.
When you see the words «high yield,» mentally substitute «risk» for «yield» since you usually don't generate more income without taking on more risk.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to report on how their investment policies and performance are affected by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of climate - related issues.37
It's strange how quickly my mindset changed from de-risking to increasing risk in two years, but I decided to take on $ 1,000,000 more in debt to buy a fixer in Golden Gate Heights because my online revenue was growing, my net worth had rebounded, and I strongly believed buying a panoramic ocean view home on both levels for $ 720 / sqft was a no brainer.
«At the risk of being even more widely despised than I currently am, I will lean over the plate and take one for the team on this.
So, if it goes some combo of Ayton, Doncic, JJJ, Bagley, Bamba, we then have to consider risking a Porter pick (not my favorite option), swinging for the fences on Trae, or the more likely scenario due to GarPax tendencies, take the safe route in Bridges.
I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.
We can not afford to take the risk and go for khedira he is to injury prone and would spend more time laying next to diaby then he would playing on the pitch big no no for me!
More than happy to take a risk on dybala, rather that than not pay the extra, only for him to turn out top class....
The Balotelli transfer could be a more ambitious job, but given he'd be available on a free and could be an ideal squad player to take the heat off Lukaku and replace the ageing Ibrahimovic, it looks a risk worth taking for the Red Devils.
Pick 54 — TE Dallas Goedert (South Dakota State)-- huge run on defense right before the pick, was best available Pick 78 — LB Malik Jefferson (Texas)-- last LB we took out of Texas turned out well for us (bye DJ), probably more of an OLB for us Pick 86 — DL Dashawn Hand (Alabama)-- getting him here is good value for splash plays, needs more consistency but worth the risk Pick 124 — DL B.J. Hill (North Carolina State)-- #more meat for the trenches Pick 199 — Edge Dorance Armstrong JR (Kansas)-- at this point in the draft he's well worth the risk for the upside Pick 211 — DL Lowell Lotulelei (Utah)-- #more meat for the trenches Pick 233 — OL Bradley Bozeman (Alabama)-- another C / G option for our line with experience on a good line / team, also see #meat / trenches Pick 243 — LB Skai Moore (South Carolina)-- here's the WILB everyone wants way down in the 7th round
We are indeed, unlikely to see any more big incoming signings (zero reports about interest in central midfield, and with Arsene seemingly intent on keeping Ox and even Wilshere, it seems like he's erring on the side of mostly keeping faith with the same players for the umpteenth summer in a row; just once I'd like him to err on the side of taking risks with the squad by shaking things up and having a bit more turnover in order to significantly improve us, but there you go...).
After requesting the club take Liverpool's # 4million bid for his services more seriously, is there a risk that Adam won't even feature on Tuesday night?
When I finally had a chance to speak, we were already running over the 2 1/2 hours allotted for the roundtable, so I was only able to briefly touch on two of my many message points: one, that the game can be and is being made safer, and two, that, based on my experience following a high school football team in Oklahoma this past season - which will be the subject of a MomsTEAM documentary to be released in early 2013 called The Smartest Team - I saw the use of hit sensors in football helmets as offering an exciting technological «end around» the problem of chronic under - reporting of concussions that continues to plague the sport and remains a major impediment, in my view, to keeping kids safe (the reasons: if an athlete is allowed to keep playing with a concussion, studies show that their recovery is likely to take longer, and they are at increased risk of long - term problems (e.g. early dementia, depression, more rapid aging of the brain, and in rare cases, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and in extremely rare instances, catastrophic injury or death.)
The yes campaign has largely taken the natural supporters of independence for granted, concentrating instead on trying to reassure those more inclined to vote no of the continuity of traditions and down playing the risks of independence — tactics more likely to appeal to those high on conscientiousness and low on openness to experience.
David Cameron should be applauded for his desire to do more on Syria and the political risk he took when engaging in the arming debate.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z