Not exact matches
For one, investors are going to have to get comfortable
taking on more risk in their equity portfolios by buying stocks at higher valuations.
And that will require investors to adjust their strategy and their expectations henceforward — by paying
more for equities,
taking on more risk with fixed income and socking away
more than they used to.
While investors will have to find stocks with higher yields, pay
more for them and
take on more risk in bonds, the biggest change in a permanently low - rate world is that people will need to set aside
more of every paycheque if they want to keep the same goal
for retirement income.
«
On the other hand, I wouldn't mind offering equity as a reward
for taking risk out of the business by bringing in three or four
more customers and diversifying the customer base.
«As hackers devise
more advanced and less recognizable threats, organizations that continue to settle
for cybersecurity strategies that rely
on a «feeling» of security are
taking even greater
risks in the coming year.»
For long - term goals that are 10, 20 or 30 years out, you do want to
take on more risk.
More from the CFO Council: Trump's tariff proposal, trade war will be bad
for both US and China: CNBC Survey Companies are
taking action
on gun control because politicians won't: CNBC Survey There's been an «overreaction» in Thai stocks to trade - war
risks, says exchange executive
«If you are just buying income and not paying attention to the valuations, you are probably
taking on more risk than you bargained
for,» says Brad Kinkelaar, head of the dividend team at Pimco.
On the other hand, if you're saving for retirement that won't come for 20 or more years, you can take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yea
On the other hand, if you're saving
for retirement that won't come
for 20 or
more years, you can
take on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad yea
on more risk because you have plenty of time to rebound after a bad year.
For example, some investors may have
taken on more risk in their portfolios in recent years by moving into lower - quality bonds or dividend stocks, in an attempt to generate additional yield.
Mr. Francois, 49,
on the job at Chrysler
for 15 months, is gaining a reputation among his ad agencies, dealers and staff
for surprising them and
taking the kinds of
risks that make them feel
more confident than they ever did while owned by German carmaker Daimler or private - equity firm Cerberus Capital.
Whether you are willing to
take on a little
more risk with your investments, or if you would rather play it safe, there's probably an option
for you.
Potenza: As the yield curve flattens, investors get less compensation
for moving further out
on the curve and
taking on more duration
risk.
Private lenders are looking
for the same information and will conduct similar due diligence as the banks, but they typically specialize in an industry and are
more willing to
take on higher -
risk loans if they see the potential.
On the contrary, I will argue that you should start searching
for — not
taking, mind you —
more risks, because engaging
risks will lead you to new market opportunities.
For example, if you're comfortable taking on more risk in exchange for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bon
For example, if you're comfortable
taking on more risk in exchange
for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with more stocks than bon
for potentially higher returns, your portfolio might be weighted with
more stocks than bonds.
And I warned at a number of junctures in 1999 before the Internet bubble, and again in the winter of 2007, that the main thing we had to fear was the lack of fear itself, precisely because a sense that everything is stable is a self - denying prophecy, because if there is a sense that everything is stable, -LSB-...] people will
take on more risk and that will then create the conditions
for future instability.
An investor saving
for retirement may be comfortable
taking on more risk than an investor saving
for a down payment.
It is a trend that is only set to accelerate as policy measures such as the recommendations from the Taskforce
for Climate - related Financial Discosures and new green finance rules from the UK and EU start to
take effect and require firms to disclose
more information
on the climate
risks they face.
This very low market volatility can lead investors to
take on more risk, and in a period of still relatively low interest rates, to «reach
for yield» — that is, buy riskier assets than one would otherwise, in order to achieve a desired profit or savings goal.
However, if you want the potential
for more reward by
taking on more risk, then you can consider KITE or JUNO.
For the past six months, markets have certainly embraced
taking on more risk.
An easy way to remember this is that
for taking on more risk, you should demand a higher yield and use a higher discount rate.
For the investor willing to take on slightly more risk for slightly more yield, SLQD is a very attractive opti
For the investor willing to
take on slightly
more risk for slightly more yield, SLQD is a very attractive opti
for slightly
more yield, SLQD is a very attractive option.
As a result of the likely move into negative real returns
on cash,
more cash savers will move into UK government bonds (gilts),
more gilt owners will swap them
for corporate bonds, some
more will move into equities, and a sliver of
risk - takers will use cheaper financing to start businesses or
take out loans to build property.
If market internals improve, we'll
take a signal that investors have shifted back to
risk - seeking, and that would ease our near - term concerns, but wouldn't materially change our expectations
for a market loss
on the order of 50 % or
more over the completion of the current cycle.
In recent issues of The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor I've covered the U.S. government's ongoing «War
on Cash»... how our government is trying to
take over the Internet with the latest push
for «net neutrality»... the
risks and advantages of digital currency like bitcoin... how U.S. banks are preparing
for «bail - ins» during the next financial crisis... how the U.S. government is using Common Core to indoctrinate children so they'll submit to the coming socialist society... and much, much
more.
As you round the bend toward retirement, it's not a good idea to
take on any
more investment
risk than necessary
for your time frame, financial circumstances, and
risk tolerance.
Individual lenders might be able to
take on a little
more risk, so credit requirements
for peer - to - peer loans are usually
more flexible.
For his master's thesis
on investment management, Jon showed how university endowments can generate
more wealth (and
take on less
risk) by adopting low - cost investment strategies.
I think most investors would be wise to
take a
more conservative posture at this point, and be willing to give up some upside
for a while... just depends
on how much relative performance
risk you can stomach.
Well, economists like to make the case
for more emphasis
on consumption taxation relative to income taxes, which can have incentive effects
on work effort, savings and
risk taking.
The reason
for this is that currently investors tend not to
take risks but to rely
more on logic and projects» implementation evaluations.
It can be unpleasant
for entrepreneurs with a
more solid financial base to discover that they are required to
take on more risk than some of their peers.
Fidelity ® Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX) This fund might be appropriate
for investors looking
for higher yield who are willing to
take on more credit
risk while limiting interest rate
risk.
When you see the words «high yield,» mentally substitute «
risk»
for «yield» since you usually don't generate
more income without
taking on more risk.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements
for institutional investors to report
on how their investment policies and performance are affected by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the
risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future,
more stringent climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can
take account of climate - related issues.37
It's strange how quickly my mindset changed from de-risking to increasing
risk in two years, but I decided to
take on $ 1,000,000
more in debt to buy a fixer in Golden Gate Heights because my online revenue was growing, my net worth had rebounded, and I strongly believed buying a panoramic ocean view home
on both levels
for $ 720 / sqft was a no brainer.
«At the
risk of being even
more widely despised than I currently am, I will lean over the plate and
take one
for the team
on this.
So, if it goes some combo of Ayton, Doncic, JJJ, Bagley, Bamba, we then have to consider
risking a Porter pick (not my favorite option), swinging
for the fences
on Trae, or the
more likely scenario due to GarPax tendencies,
take the safe route in Bridges.
I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he
takes up often in front of Santi and
takes major
risks in winning the ball back
for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard
on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space,
more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily
on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.
We can not afford to
take the
risk and go
for khedira he is to injury prone and would spend
more time laying next to diaby then he would playing
on the pitch big no no
for me!
More than happy to
take a
risk on dybala, rather that than not pay the extra, only
for him to turn out top class....
The Balotelli transfer could be a
more ambitious job, but given he'd be available
on a free and could be an ideal squad player to
take the heat off Lukaku and replace the ageing Ibrahimovic, it looks a
risk worth
taking for the Red Devils.
Pick 54 — TE Dallas Goedert (South Dakota State)-- huge run
on defense right before the pick, was best available Pick 78 — LB Malik Jefferson (Texas)-- last LB we
took out of Texas turned out well
for us (bye DJ), probably
more of an OLB
for us Pick 86 — DL Dashawn Hand (Alabama)-- getting him here is good value
for splash plays, needs
more consistency but worth the
risk Pick 124 — DL B.J. Hill (North Carolina State)-- #
more meat
for the trenches Pick 199 — Edge Dorance Armstrong JR (Kansas)-- at this point in the draft he's well worth the
risk for the upside Pick 211 — DL Lowell Lotulelei (Utah)-- #
more meat
for the trenches Pick 233 — OL Bradley Bozeman (Alabama)-- another C / G option
for our line with experience
on a good line / team, also see #meat / trenches Pick 243 — LB Skai Moore (South Carolina)-- here's the WILB everyone wants way down in the 7th round
We are indeed, unlikely to see any
more big incoming signings (zero reports about interest in central midfield, and with Arsene seemingly intent
on keeping Ox and even Wilshere, it seems like he's erring
on the side of mostly keeping faith with the same players
for the umpteenth summer in a row; just once I'd like him to err
on the side of
taking risks with the squad by shaking things up and having a bit
more turnover in order to significantly improve us, but there you go...).
After requesting the club
take Liverpool's # 4million bid
for his services
more seriously, is there a
risk that Adam won't even feature
on Tuesday night?
When I finally had a chance to speak, we were already running over the 2 1/2 hours allotted
for the roundtable, so I was only able to briefly touch
on two of my many message points: one, that the game can be and is being made safer, and two, that, based
on my experience following a high school football team in Oklahoma this past season - which will be the subject of a MomsTEAM documentary to be released in early 2013 called The Smartest Team - I saw the use of hit sensors in football helmets as offering an exciting technological «end around» the problem of chronic under - reporting of concussions that continues to plague the sport and remains a major impediment, in my view, to keeping kids safe (the reasons: if an athlete is allowed to keep playing with a concussion, studies show that their recovery is likely to
take longer, and they are at increased
risk of long - term problems (e.g. early dementia, depression,
more rapid aging of the brain, and in rare cases, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and in extremely rare instances, catastrophic injury or death.)
The yes campaign has largely
taken the natural supporters of independence
for granted, concentrating instead
on trying to reassure those
more inclined to vote no of the continuity of traditions and down playing the
risks of independence — tactics
more likely to appeal to those high
on conscientiousness and low
on openness to experience.
David Cameron should be applauded
for his desire to do
more on Syria and the political
risk he
took when engaging in the arming debate.