Sentences with phrase «more fuel usage»

Not exact matches

The results from the case studies show that flexible packaging has more preferable environmental attributes for carbon impact, fossil fuel usage, water usage, product - to - package ratio, as well as material to landfill, when compared to other package formats.
More than a third of today's Swedish fuel usage could be replaced with the new technology.
There are other technologies — cylinder deactivation, lean - burn engines, high - gear - count transmissions, clean diesels and more — that decrease fuel usage, or don't.
I like the vehicle information systems to track time and distance travelled, fuel usage rate, trip distance and more — plus, it has fantastic fuel economy (7.2 L / 100 km in economy mode).
IMPORTANT: Starting with 2015 model year vehicles, the Government of Canada has mandated new fuel economy test methods to better approximate typical driving conditions and styles by adjusting city and highway ratings to account for air conditioner usage, cold temperature operation and driving at higher speeds with more rapid acceleration and braking.
The Army is in the midst of a significant transformation of its fleet of 70,000 nontactical vehicles (NTVs), including the current deployment of more than 500 hybrids and the acquisition of 4,000 low - speed electric vehicles at domestic installations to help cut fossil fuel usage.
Unless incentives change considerably, the shor - and medium - term futures will be based on more, not less, fossil fuel usage, not just here but everywhere that is struggling to create more economic growth.
If you know your fuel usage, a more accurate method of calculating your emissions, click the link also at top right.
If you know your fuel usage, a more accurate method of calculating your emissions, click the link to the top right.
This is justified not by using full - fuel - cycle analysis but merely by finding electricity to be more energy efficient than gas in terms of on - site energy usage.
The US is aware of this potential, and has instructed its delegates at multilateral development banks (MDBs) to promote access to and cleaner, more efficient fossil fuel usage in the world in a bid to reverse World Bank restrictions.
We can cut our transportation fuel usage more than in half by making smaller cars and shifting to diesel hybrids for power.
Increased usage of fossil fuels around the world has multiple downsides that are becoming more obvious as we move forward.
Because the earth (mother earth, or Gaia, to all you tree hugger freaks) knows what we want, and what is best for us, and what is best is our nice Goldilocks climate that supports the inviolate and constitutionally protected right to cheap, atmosphere changing fossil fuels even though said usage essentially reverses 10s of millions of years of earth lower atmosphere affecting energy balances within a mere speck of time) and not you eco fools who want to harm the poor (something climate change would never do, bill gates and the world's leading scientists and thinkers and economists are fools to even think it — climate change will affect the wealthy) just to give the even more power over our individual lives.
This claim seems to have contributed to the popular perception that our fossil fuel usage is causing «more extreme weather», e.g., see here, here or here.
But the upside is three-fold: (i) your tax reduction or dividend check will offset much, perhaps more than 100 %, of those price increases; (ii) you'll be able to minimize your tax bite by cutting down on fuel usage (e.g., shortening those country drives, buying locally - grown produce, purchasing «green power» from wind and solar cells); and (iii) Americans» combined behavior changes in response to the carbon tax will go a long way toward protecting the climate and averting the cataclysmic consequences of unchecked global warming.
Since solar effects, both direct and indirect, are more than sufficient to account for net estimated temperature change over the period of significant fossil fuel usage, have humans been warming or cooling the planet?
Recognizing that even in a world where energy is constrained / more expensive there will always be a certain volume of goods traded globally, due to they being only able to be produced in certain locations by virtue of geographical and climatic conditions, as well as comparative advantage still standing, greater localization and regionalization of production and trade would reduce fuel usage — provided that shipment of those goods was done via train or inland waterway, not trucks.
Although there more quickly renewable sources of biomass for cooking than wood, a 50 % reduction in fuel usage compared with other tradtional stoves is something to take seriously.
This phone also fueled by a 3,000 mAh capacity battery which would last a battery juice more than a day of normal usage.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z