«The meltwater feedback cycle under the ice shelf will only slow down once the shelf has collapsed, or
no more glacial ice flows in from inland to take its place.
Not exact matches
Evidence of past
glacial advance and retreat is also
more easily observed in the Dry Valleys, providing a window into the past behavior of the vast Antarctic
ice sheets and their influence on global sea levels.
As a result of such breakups,
more than 150 cubic kilometers of
glacial ice has slid off land into the ocean.
When floating
ice shelves disintegrate, they reduce the resistance to
glacial flow and thus allow the grounded glaciers they were buttressing to significantly dump
more ice into the ocean, raising sea levels.
The
more intensive variations during
glacial periods are due to the greater difference in temperature between the
ice - covered polar regions and the Tropics, which produced a
more dynamic exchange of warm and cold air masses.
The researchers found that during
glacial periods when the atmosphere was colder and sea
ice was far
more extensive, deep ocean waters came to the surface much further north of the Antarctic continent than they do today.
The sediment cores used in this study cover a period when the planet went through many climate cycles driven by variations in Earth's orbit, from extreme
glacial periods such as the Last Glacial Maximum about 20,000 years ago, when massive ice sheets covered the northern parts of Europe and North America, to relatively warm interglacial periods with climates more like t
glacial periods such as the Last
Glacial Maximum about 20,000 years ago, when massive ice sheets covered the northern parts of Europe and North America, to relatively warm interglacial periods with climates more like t
Glacial Maximum about 20,000 years ago, when massive
ice sheets covered the northern parts of Europe and North America, to relatively warm interglacial periods with climates
more like today's.
By 1900, increased emissions of soot could have triggered the loss of
more than 15 m of
ice from a glacier's surface; by 1930, the loss could have totaled 30 m or
more — magnitudes and timing that can easily account for the Alpine
glacial retreat, the scientists contend.
Since so much of the
ice sheet is grounded underwater, rising sea levels may have the effect of lifting the sheets, allowing
more - and increasingly warmer - water underneath it, leading to further bottom melting,
more ice shelf disintegration, accelerated
glacial flow, and further sea level rise, and so on and on, another vicious cycle.
Leaving aside the collapse of the Larsen - B
ice shelf and other
ice shelves in Antarctica, is it too simplistic to expect that dramatic changes should be anticipated first in the Arctic because it is sea covered by a few meters of sea
ice and therefore
more susceptible to change, in comparison to Antarctica (which is obviously land covered by
glacial ice up to several kilometers thick in places)?
Methane changes much
more quickly than CO2 in the
ice core records, through the Younger Dryas for example, which lasted 1000 years, methane goes back to
glacial values while CO2 sort of hovers in place.
The abstract doesn't have the room to provide
more information on how the melting of
glacial ice has weakened part of the volcano, leading to an increased potential for a landslide.
«Conversely, there is
more and better evidence across Iceland that when the
ice sheet underwent major reduction at the end of the last
glacial period, there was a large increase in both the frequency and volume of basalt erupted — with some estimates being 30 times higher than the present day.
Recent research shows that there is high microbial activity on
glacial surfaces (Anesio et al., 2009), some associated with pigmented algae, which absorb significantly
more light than local inorganic dust particles on the Greenland
Ice Sheet (GrIS)(Lutz et al., 2014).
During the Middle Pleistocene,
ice sheets were reaching the continental shelf for longer, with
more distinct
glacial - interglacial cyclicity [28].
However, as a
glacial period lengthens,
ice sheets become larger, but also
more unstable.
With higher precipitation, portions of this snow may not melt during the summer and so
glacial ice can form at lower altitudes and
more southerly latitudes, reducing the temperatures over land by increased albedo as noted above.
This all - wheel drive, tri-axle
ice vehicle transports you safely up to Athabasca Glacier where you'll step out onto
glacial ice that could be as old as 200,000 years or
more.
In contrast, the much
more expansive
ice volume maxima (equivalently, sea level minima) during a
glacial maximum is
more defined.
Methane changes much
more quickly than CO2 in the
ice core records, through the Younger Dryas for example, which lasted 1000 years, methane goes back to
glacial values while CO2 sort of hovers in place.
The bottom line is that climatic change effects are being experienced RIGHT NOW; some are subtle while others are
more overt, like
glacial retreat, an increase in the severity and unpredictability of weather phenomena, or the North Polar
ice cap shrinking to its lowest surface area in history.
Samples of gas trapped in
ice cores taken from the Greenland and Antarctic
ice sheets have enabled scientists to determine that the level of CO2 in the atmosphere has fluctuated between approximately 180 ppm (
glacial advance and colder climate in the higher latitudes) and 280 ppm (
glacial retreat and warmer climate in the higher latitudes), over the past 400,000 or
more years.
Leaving aside the collapse of the Larsen - B
ice shelf and other
ice shelves in Antarctica, is it too simplistic to expect that dramatic changes should be anticipated first in the Arctic because it is sea covered by a few meters of sea
ice and therefore
more susceptible to change, in comparison to Antarctica (which is obviously land covered by
glacial ice up to several kilometers thick in places)?
He makes the following statement, which is misleading if not outright wrong: Paleo records shows that both temperature and sea level have been mostly rising since last
glacial maximum and
more recently, since the so called little
ice age.
If I may add one
more speculative question: are the portions of
glacial sheets formed during periods of high
ice flux less stable, and
more prone to calving, than those formed during slow flux?
It is also possible for cold climates to increase chemical weathering in some ways, by lowering sea level to expose
more land to erosion (though I'd guess this can also increase oxydation of C in sediments) and by supplying
more sediments via
glacial erosion for chemical weathering (of course, those sediments must make it to warmer conditions to make the process effective — downhill and downstream, or perhaps via pulsed
ice ages -LRB-?)-RRB-.
It is true that during
ice ages the oceans took up
more CO2 and that is why there was less in the atmosphere, and during the warming at the end of
glacial cycles that CO2 came back out of the ocean, and this was an important amplifying feedback.
Alarmed at the pace of change to our Earth caused by human - induced climate change, including accelerating melting and loss of
ice from Greenland, the Himalayas and Antarctica, acidification of the world's oceans due to rising CO2 concentrations, increasingly intense tropical cyclones,
more damaging and intense drought and floods, including
glacial lakes outburst loods, in many regions and higher levels of sea - level rise than estimated just a few years ago, risks changing the face of the planet and threatening coastal cities, low lying areas, mountainous regions and vulnerable countries the world over,
From what I've heard has been happening in the Arctic, that sounds
more like acceleration too, in the loss of
glacial ice, permafrost and sea
ice.
Should it be attained, this state would be
more «symmetric» than the present climate, with comparable areas of
ice / sea -
ice cover in each hemisphere, and would represent the culmination of 50 million years of evolution from bipolar nonglacial climates to bipolar
glacial climates.
Global average temperature is lower during
glacial periods for two primary reasons: 1) there was only about 190 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere, and other major greenhouse gases (CH4 and N2O) were also lower 2) the earth surface was
more reflective, due to the presence of lots of
ice and snow on land, and lots
more sea
ice than today (that is, the albedo was higher).
I believe the average life span of a
glacial period is 90,000 years and often features NYC under
more than a kilometer thick of
ice.
* It would take only a small further reduction in climate forcing (less long - lived GHGs or whatever) to yield
more ice during the
glacial phase of
glacial - interglacial oscillations.
The thing is, Antarctic land
ice loss will continue and accelerate as
glacial terminators erode
more and
more quickly.
DSL: «The thing is, Antarctic land
ice loss will continue and accelerate as
glacial terminators erode
more and
more quickly.
(William: Come on man, the sun is causing what is observed) Phenomena such as the Younger Dryas and Heinrich events might only occur in a «
glacial» world with much larger
ice sheets and
more extensive sea
ice cover.
Glacial periods during the 100,000 - year cycles have been characterised by a very slow build - up of
ice which took thousands of years, the result of
ice volume responding to orbital change far
more slowly than the ocean temperatures reacted.
Warm ocean water plays a significant role in melting
glacial ice from below, and a better mapping of Antarctica's and Greenland's landforms beneath the
ice suggests that ocean melting of the glacier fronts may play a
more significant role than previously thought as the
ice sheets retreat (under a global warming scenario).
An
ice sheet is a mass of
glacial land
ice extending
more than 50,000 square kilometers (20,000 square miles).
This
glacial melt heat conveyor is the kind of process we are seeing
more and
more frequently near the great
ice sheets as fossil fuel industry has continued its harmful emissions.
The vertical movements that occurred during retreat of the
ice sheets in late
glacial time are very much
more complex than during postglacial time.
Abrupt and severe temperature shifts have occurred on occasion in the past, typically separated by hundreds of years or
more, but shifts of this magnitude that are global in extent have almost always occurred during
glacial eras, when the extent of snow and
ice allowed for great changes in feedback in response to only modest signals.
The vulnerable nations declared that they are, «Alarmed at the pace of change to our Earth caused by human - induced climate change, including accelerating melting and loss of
ice from Greenland, the Himalayas and Antarctica, acidification of the world's oceans due to rising CO2 concentrations, increasingly intense tropical cyclones,
more damaging and intense drought and floods, including
Glacial Lakes Outburst Floods, in many regions and higher levels of sea - level rise than estimated just a few years ago, risks changing the face of the planet and threatening coastal cities, low lying areas, mountainous regions and vulnerable countries the world over...»
Let's put
more distance between ourselves and the last
glacial maximum, when great
ice sheets stretched over the USA and Europe.
Also, current understanding of
glacial ice melting due to global warming indicates that the Western Antarctic...... Read
more»
Since
glacial ice deforms like very slow putty, the steepening of the glacier would have caused the
more mobile, middle section to flow pick up speed.
Clouds modulate Earth's energy budget over millennia and
more — second only to runaway
ice sheet feedbacks leading to
glacials every 100,000 odd years.
A challenge for climate sleuths has been to find a place holding a series of corals dating back into and beyond the last
ice age, when sea levels were
more than 300 feet lower than they are now because so much water was locked up in
glacial ice.
We could, of course, hit some bifurcation in the system where we lose all the summer Arctic sea
ice or the Amazon forest, which is bad enough, and could possibly transition the climate to a different «solution» on a hysteresis diagram... this to me would represent
more of a step-wise jump (akin to a larger bifurcation that you get in a snowball Earth as you gradually reduce CO2 or the solar constant); but ultimately these represent different behavior than «the interannual variability of the large scale dynamics will increase» or that for some reason the climate should be susceptible to
more «flip flops» (as in the
glacial Heinrich / D - O events), of which I am aware of no observational or theoretical support.
Overall, when taking a look at these newly realized
ice - sheet weaknesses, it's worth noting that the total heat forcing impacting the world's ocean, air, and
glacial systems is now rising into a range that is much
more in line with Middle Miocene values.