Sentences with phrase «more joint physical custody»

If you want a more joint physical custody you can give the parent with less parenting time more time with the child.

Not exact matches

While these side benefits should never be the primary reason to choose joint physical custody, they're worth considering if you're having trouble looking on the bright... MORE side of a court - ordered joint custody arrangement.

However, for parents who share joint physical custody, it's generally more common for them to also share joint legal custody, as well.

Joint physical custody is rarely a 50/50 time split, but it affords both parents considerable time with the child, more than if one of them merely had parenting time once a week or so.

This meant that, while not necessarily splitting their children's time equally — that arrangement, known as «joint physical custody,» is both more cumbersome and less common — they continued to fully share parental rights and responsibilities.

Below, you will find tips on the key differences among legal custody, physical custody, sole custody, joint custody, and more.

In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.

When parents have joint custody, they have equal decision making rights, although one parent may have physical custody of the child significantly more than the other parent.

If a parent awarded joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal custody is relocating the residence of the minor child to a location which is one hundred fifty miles or more from the residence of the minor child at the time that custody was awarded, the court may consider the relocation a substantial change in circumstances.

It is possible to have both physical and legal joint custody of children, though joint legal custody is more common.

Courts can award joint physical custody — meaning that the toddler lives with both parents in equal time shares — or, the court can award sole physical custody — also called primary physical custody, meaning the toddler lives with one parent more than the other.

In recent years, the label of shared / joint physical custody has become more commonly used in describing a parenting arrangement; however, actual 50 - 50 sharing of the child is still NOT the norm or most common parenting plan the court adopts or that parents choose.

«Two other studies similarly found joint physical custody to be more beneficial to children and adolescents than sole maternal custody along multiple dimensions when conflict was low, but these benefits were suppressed by high levels of conflict (Lee, 2002; Maccoby & Mnookin, 1992).»

When calculating child support by North Carolina standards, joint physical custody means the child spends approximately 123 or more nights annually with the non-residential parent.

This can also be called «joint physical custody,» even though one parent has more parenting time than the other.

The parents may also have court - ordered joint or shared physical custody, meaning that each parent spends 30 percent or more with the child, or greater than 109 overnights a year.

Parents with Joint physical custody share responsibility for the child's time within a more equitable schedule.

Depending upon the arrangements, physical custody may be sole or joint, but sole custody with the mother is more the norm.

It's difficult logistically to divide a child's time exactly 50/50 between households, so even when parents share joint physical custody, their child might live with one more often than the other.

Children in a joint physical custody arrangement suffered from fewer psychosomatic problems than those living mostly or only with one parent but reported more symptoms than those in non-broken families.

Perhaps one party has a more demanding job than the other so in this case joint custody by the physical definition may not make sense.

In joint physical custody situations, the child usually spends marginally more time with one parent, referred to as the «primary custodial parent.»

Fact: Fewer child support awards are ordered in joint physical custody cases; there is a greater income differential between fathers» households and mothers» households post-divorce in joint custody situations than in sole custody situations; and fathers with joint custody are more likely to have higher incomes relative to their ex-wives than fathers in situations of maternal custody.

Even with joint physical custody, the children usually spend a little more time with one parent.

Frequent visits and joint custody schedules led to more verbal and physical abuse.

Joint physical custody is rarely a 50/50 time split, but it affords both parents considerable time with the child, more than if one of them merely had parenting time once a week or so.

We now have more than 50 studies of joint physical custody.

Much more common than true joint custody arrangements (where both physical and legal custody are shared) is «joint legal custody,» in which both parents share the right to make long - term decisions about the raising of a child and key aspects of the child's welfare, with physical custody awarded to one parent.

In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.

Results showed negative effects for sole custody: «Single custody subjects evidenced greater self - hate and perceived more rejection from their fathers than joint physical custody subjects.»

[FN181] Nevertheless, the alternative of no access to this type of public benefit in one of their dwellings under a joint physical custody arrangement makes the lives of children living in poverty even more tenuous.

I read this as «the children who were in joint legal and joint physical custody (no difference) got along better with and spent more time with their fathers.

Parents with joint physical custody do not generally have significantly less conflict or more cooperative relationships than parents with sole physical custody.

While Courts recognize that a parent can not realistically be confined to one geographic location, the greater the distance between the parents, the more difficult it can be to effectively exercise a joint physical custody arrangement.

If there is joint physical custody but the child is living much more of the time with one parent than the other, would the parents need to change the child support arrangements to reflect the actual custody arrangements?