Sentences with phrase «more judicial control»

Not exact matches

Republicans need just a simple 51 - vote total to confirm a judicial nominee after the filibuster on lower - level court judicial nominees was killed by Democrats when they last controlled the Senate in an effort to help move along some of Obama's nominees more quickly.

The solution proposed to tackle those difficulties is nevertheless fundamentally different: the Court would intervene ex post to clarify the meaning and assess the legality of a standard as part of EU law, whereas the Parliament calls for more ex ante control mechanisms being put in place and seems to ignore the possibility of ex post judicial control in this particular context.

The sacred cows are: 1) that the administration of the courts must remain under the control of the executive of the government; 2) that unlimited judicial resources... [more]

The advantage is that English law is more predictable when the express words of the agreement will normally be enforced and there are tight controls on judicial interference when deals do not turn out as the parties expected.

In a repeat of efforts first started in 2014, legislators pressed to give more control to the governor and legislature over the state's Judicial Council which serves as the judicial nominating commission for thJudicial Council which serves as the judicial nominating commission for thjudicial nominating commission for the state.

Some solutions proposed are: rationing of judicial time for example by assigning a fixed number of motions to each proceeding; charging higher filing fees for additional motions; penalizing obstructionist conduct through multiples of indemnification costs; awarding priority dates to well - run litigation; more motions in writing; higher filing costs for longer hearings; more aggressive use by the Bench of rules that permit judges to control the court process such as time limits for evidence in chief and cross, and some outsourcing of judicative functions.

Unlike laws allowing legislatures to override court rules or giving politicians more control over judicial selection, recusal rules govern the ethics of judges, and they are only necessary in states in which the high courts have failed to respond adequately to the swelling tide of campaign cash.

We now have «judicial involvement» in the discredited control order regime which one judge has aptly dismissed as having no more than «a thin veneer of legality».