Sentences with phrase «more liberal judges»

Judges Judith Rogers and Harry Edwards, two of the more liberal judges on the D.C. Circuit, said no.

But neither governor was able to shift the balance of the court, which remains at four conservative judges and three more liberal judges.

Not exact matches

One more factor is very powerful in shielding technology from examination: liberal democratic individualism — the notion that the individual is to be the judge of what is the good life for him or her.

Both views are embedded in our national history — the republican view more in the Declaration of Independence, where Jefferson in its opening lines refers to «the laws of nature and of nature «s God» that stand above and judge the laws of men; and the liberal view more in the Constitution, where there is no reference to God at all, and the emphasis is upon the balancing of powers.6.

Fair enough, though we need to see a lot more details of Red Tory policy before we can really judge how liberal / illiberal it is in this sense.

Match found that 91 percent of liberals say they judge potential dates negatively for having voted for Trump, and more than half said they're more likely to ask about their political views since the election.

This set him apart from his more - liberal colleagues, who viewed Brown v. Board of Education (1954) not as a prohibition on the use of racial classifications in education, but rather as a mandate for judges to do whatever they could to promote «equal educational opportunity.»

The court's conservative justices said they were inclined to reverse a 9th Circuit Court decision requiring immigration judges to give a bond hearing and consider possible release for noncitizens who have been jailed for more than six months, while the liberal justices sounded unsure as to whether a specific time limit can be upheld.

In the six years ending in 1998, for instance, more than two - thirds of the clerks for three liberal justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David H. Souter and John Paul Stevens — had first clerked for appeals court judges appointed by Democratic presidents.

While Lord Carnwath in Marks and Spencer considered that Lord Hoffmann's approach had not diluted the requirements for an implied term, Lord Neuberger's concern that Belize Telecom could be interpreted in that way was well - founded: as Lord Neuberger pointed out, both academic lawyers and judges had treated Belize Telecom as changing the law; and the tenant in Marks and Spencer contended that it had led to a more liberal approach.

At worst, torturing the sports metaphors still further, some judges might have an «expanded strike zone,» allowing for a liberal interpretation and others a more restrictive «narrow strike zone» but even in those cases, the judge / umpire equally applies that zone to both teams.

Suffice it to say that my political positions are closer to his than those of the most liberal justices, and that's why I wouldn't want to suggest that conservative judges would be more likely to defend unreasonable outcomes such as the damages award in this Apple v. Samsung case.

In recent years a marked division has arisen in the court between liberals and conservatives, usually with a few judges having a more flexible approach which may place them in one camp or the other depending on the particular issue at stake.

That is, if interveners are shifting judges in a more conservative or more liberal direction, it appears that interveners are shifting the members of the Court as a bloc or, alternatively, not so far or so differentially as to cause judges to occupy a different ranking in policy space vis - à - vis his or her colleagues on the Court.

The clearest example is that judges with high liberal voting percentages (such as Justices Arbour and Fish) tended to vote more conservatively in the presence of conservative interveners.

In a post where he appears to reveal more than his opinion of the numbers, Volokh writes, «This isn't some liberal judge on the Ninth Circuit slamming the immigration bureaucracy — it's a moderate conservative, citing many opinions from the Seventh Circuit (which has a reputation as being pretty sane).

The Mediated Parenting Agreement that these parents made for the benefit of their child was much more detailed and better for the child than the «liberal, flexible visitation» that a judge would be likely to order after a 20 - minute court hearing.

Even if the judge takes a more liberal view about you moving in with someone else before your divorce is over, doing that still inserts a total stranger into your children's lives.