As the Democratic party became more liberal, more conservatives joined the Republican party» and
more liberals left the GOP for the Democrats.
Not exact matches
And while some viewers — and her co-host — occasionally accuse Lang of having
left - leaning sympathies, she says it has
more to do with counterbalancing O'Leary's conservatism than growing up in a
Liberal household.
In their 2015 election platform, the Trudeau
Liberals identified a number of items related to Employment Insurance (EI) that they would change: reversing the Harper EI reforms defining «suitable work»; reducing the waiting period for EI benefits; reducing EI premiums; introducing
more flexible parental
leave; providing better access to compassionate care; and increasing funding for employment and training programs managed by provinces, territories and Aboriginal labour market organizations.
In my opinion, Edmonton - Centre MLA Laurie Blakeman was the only candidate who
left the impression that she would define the
Liberal Party as
more than just a softer version of the Progressive Conservatives.
The previous
Liberal government having increased spending 47 per cent in its last six years in office; the Conservatives having increased spending another 19 per cent in its first three years («good times»), and a further 20 per cent over the next two («bad times»); after doubling spending, in short, in the space of a decade, the government's notion of restraint is
more or less to
leave it there.
IMHO, there tends to be little electoral overlap between the provincial and federal levels, at least in this province, and in fact the vote splits between right,
left and centre are quite different with one unified Conservative party (
more aligned with Wildrose than with Alberta PC), and a not - quite - as - moribund
Liberal party in play.
His roll of the dice has cost the long esteemed
LIBERAL PARTY its position in parliament and brought to the fore a
more left - oriented NDP.
Additionally, the B.C.
Liberals are
leaving schools short on funding after hitting them with hikes to MSP premiums, hydro rates and
more operational expenses.
It's just that I have
more important things to do that argue with far
left liberals 24/7.
Although I'm not convinced that reporting on the incident reflects a
liberal bias as much as the
more practical «if it bleeds it leads» bias, it is clear that much of the rhetoric among
left - wing personalities like Keith Olberman has been infused with unfair generalities.
Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight,
liberal, or conservative, should be
left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right,
more of which are planned to be done soon enough.
If
liberals felt political constraints, then Sanders pushing Clinton to the
left would increase the risk of the election of a (
more conservative) Republican.
1) Block everything from the
left for 4 years 2) Prevent
liberals from doing any
more damage to this country 3) Get ready for the next election in 4 years
More fantasy from the
Liberal left.
The departure, according to a number of professors, is seen as Deneen
leaving the
more liberal Georgetown to teach at the
more conservative Notre Dame.
UPDATE: Pete has similar thoughts, ones a bit
more focused on
liberal pundit - dom, over at No
Left Turns.
I guess I want to see someone with
more liberal Christian views actually stay in the church at some point (most of us just
leave).
That argument has resonated with the
liberal side with evident satisfaction, but it may deliver
more than the
liberal justices or their allies on the
Left seem to recognize.
To my mind, the modern, «nonauthoritarian,» «take - us - or -
leave - us» style of pastoring owes
more to the
liberal world view — with its concept of the autonomous individual — than it does to any theological perspective.
The modern, «nonauthoritarian,» «take - us - or -
leave - us» style of pastoring owes
more to the
liberal world view — with its concept of the autonomous individual — than it does to any theological perspective.
Bob, I hate to break it to you, but Canada is far
more liberal than the US is (you could argue that Canada's far right party is to the
left of the democratic party in the US).
I'd have to say that was how I was pulled out of liberalism and after reading none Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, I kept reading
more and
more, None Dare Call It Treason, etc, and eventually had to face that my
liberal beliefs had no foundation (the Rockefellers are near the top of the pile and they buy everyone on both sides, right and
left).
With the «opening to the
left,» itself made possible by that incipient differentiation of the party and the church in the early 1960s, the possibility of an autonomous
liberal civil religion became
more real.
A course in music that
leaves the student free to study nothing but hip - hop is
more liberal, in one sense, than a course that insists on harmony, counterpoint, and a study of the classics.
But one thing that differentiated all the activists, D'Annunzio, Marinetti, and Mussolini from a
left - wing socialist like Gramsci and a conservative
liberal like Croce was their glorification of war and
more particularly their violent interventionism in the First World War.
The
liberal left is much larger, but the illiberal
left is much angrier and much
more vocal.
That some of us are crazy ass
liberals, who think that women should be able to make decisions for themselves, and some of us are
more conservative with our beliefs (that might be a lie, I think we're all
left - leaning hippies).
The tendency has been to bog down in fights between the Right and the
Left, where conservatives were worried that character education programs were all about teaching mushy diversity and general sort of tolerance, and
liberals were worried that character education was about teaching religion and
more conservative values.
Firmly on the
more liberal end of the Conservative spectrum, he caused consternation in Tory ranks and considerable bemusement in the media when he called on the party to pay less attention to Winston Churchill and
more to
left - wing Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee.
Some analysts have provided interesting evidence to suggest that online polls could be significantly overstating support for
Leave through the way they handle undecided voters and by failing to represent
more socially
liberal voters who are harder to reach.
The party is hesitant to come out with something that pleases one group and alienates the other as it attempts to hold together a shaky coalition of city - dwelling
liberals and comparatively socially conservative, but economically
left - leaning, voters who're
more likely to reside in smaller towns in Wales, the Midlands and the North.
That motion of conservative Democrats to the Republicans would have
left the Democratic party
more liberal.
This analysis confirms what we might have anticipated from the evidence of the polls — local authorities appear to contain
more Leave voters if there was a large vote for UKIP there in the 2014 European elections, if there was a small vote for parties of the «
left» (Labour,
Liberal Democrats, Scottish and Welsh Nationalists and Greens) on the same occasion, and in places with relatively low proportions of graduates, young people, and people from an ethnic minority background.
One thing to note is also that Scotland as a whole is far
more liberal and
left - wing (both socio - economically and in terms of global issues) than England is, especially under the leadership of David Cameron.
Matters are coming full circle today, as the military council appears to be encouraging the Muslim Brothers once
more, in a bid to neutralize the
liberal and
left - leaning forces of the new revolution.»
Some on the
liberal -
left might be alienated by any move towards a
left - wing populism that takes a
more critical stance towards the EU or immigration, but they might just hold their noses and take the plunge if it also meant a
more robust defence of the NHS and serious moves to rebalance and democratise the economy.
A surge in Ukip's support, combined with an expected bloodbath for the
Liberal Democrats, could
leave the eurosceptic party with
more seats than the coalition partner.
on the face of it the American
left are socially
liberal but the bottom line is the
more control they take over the economy and the redistribution of wealth, the
more power they will gain over society at large and the
more power they will have to implement social engineering projects.
The answer is for the
left to win arguments with real people and stop is time honoured Fabian strategy of, manipulating the system to vastly exaggerate the power held by a small minority whilst simultaneously complaining about their inability to concentrate even more power with Left Liberal courtiers via PR What the left hate and what they can not admit is that their leaders despise the views of many of their voters, perhaps a major
left to win arguments with real people and stop is time honoured Fabian strategy of, manipulating the system to vastly exaggerate the power held by a small minority whilst simultaneously complaining about their inability to concentrate even
more power with
Left Liberal courtiers via PR What the left hate and what they can not admit is that their leaders despise the views of many of their voters, perhaps a major
Left Liberal courtiers via PR What the
left hate and what they can not admit is that their leaders despise the views of many of their voters, perhaps a major
left hate and what they can not admit is that their leaders despise the views of many of their voters, perhaps a majority.
Liberal Republicans (Centre Republicans): Alan Milburn, Anthony Giddens (to a large extent), Richard Reeves, Philip Collins Democratic Republicans (
Left Republicans): Gordon Brown, Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Jim Knight, The Co-operative Party, Scientists for Labour, James Purnell has flirted with
Liberal Republicanism, but may well have shifted to Democratic republicanism, as he proved in his resignation letter in the Times, calling for a
more open democracy, a
more active state and greater regulation.
At the 2010 election
Liberal Democrat MPs, members and voters were all more social liberal than economic liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e. left rather than right of
Liberal Democrat MPs, members and voters were all
more social
liberal than economic liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e. left rather than right of
liberal than economic
liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e. left rather than right of
liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e.
left rather than right of centre.
With many
left leaning 2010
Liberal Democrat voters having switched to Labour, Greens and even UKIP, their voter base will also be much
more right wing.
Liberal Democrats after the election: a
left of centre party which should be able to work
more easily with Labour than the Conservatives
The best possible political use of opposition to cutting lone parent benefits was made because it was
left neither to enemies of the working class to cynically exploit — specifically the
Liberal Democrats — nor simply to those most affected or
more minority forces in the labour movement.
But for the 2015 general election, the
Liberal Democrats appear to have moved away from this approach, placing less emphasis on their
left - wing ideology and political change and
more on competence and common sense values.
But the problem is
more acute for Goldsmith because politically, London is a
left - leaning city, with
liberal values and a large ethnic minority population.
I have no doubt that Labour will oppose the coalition's cuts from the
left, but I don't see how there can be any hope that Labour takes a
more liberal position than the coalition, which will disappoint Sunny.
Many people know that that was my first instinct and would have been
more logical given the historic
Liberal position as a
left of centre party.
If they signalled they wouldn't do so, two immediate points of interest come to mind: 1) If Labour were the largest party, or even in a whole UK majority, but the Tories were the largest rump UK party, the
Liberal Democrats could
more easily claim a renewed coalition with the Conservatives was preferable to a centre -
left alliance, since a government that would lose its majority within a year would be unable to govern effectively; 2) A Labour or Labour - led government following a «yes» vote would have an incentive to push back the date of independence as far as possible.
but
more hospitals would be needed to hold all the
liberals,
left - wingers in the US.