Sentences with phrase «more liberal society»

As society moves more and more from a conservative one into a more liberal society, people are starting to...

As a final point, in today's generally more liberal society in Florida, the idea of a sugar momma of any age actively seeking her sugar baby is far more acceptable then even, say, 10 years ago.

However, the Indian online dating scene has evolved to satisfy... based in the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, at IndianCupid you'd think a more liberal society...

In today's more liberal society nsa dating has become more accepted and the explosion of the internet and on - the - move browsing has made no strings dating more available to everybody, from horny young adults to the middle - aged looking to reinject some excitement into their sex life.

However, the Indian online dating scene has evolved to satisfy... based in the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, at IndianCupid you'd think a more liberal society awaits, instead the site asks, «Are you manglik?»

While India doesn't have an app to unite the politically inclined like the US with its «Trump.dating... Australia, at IndianCupid you'd think a more liberal society...

Not exact matches

They are communitarians, that is, «if philosophical liberals are those who believe that all our problems can be solved by autonomous individuals, a market economy, and a procedural state, whereas communitarians believe that more substantive ethical identities and a more active participation in a democratic polity are necessary for the functioning of any decent society.»

Dalahäst So, like I said, you are actually a product of our modern, more liberal, egalitarian society, but you are insisting on giving credit for this to «Christianity», as if Christianity has always lined up with your beliefs.

However, the more insecure the future of a liberal, secular society appears to be, the more confident I feel about the future of religion — not a future in relation to emancipation and economic and / or political liberation.

This entire article bases the «diversity» of a group that is not based on the whole of American Society which is much more moderate having both liberal and conservative tendencies.

Now, much more ambitious liberals hold that religion must be private in the extreme sense that it must not be allowed to engage, in its own way, with the society at large.

Given the latest medical data concerning the distinct characteristics of the fetus and its ability to survive outside the womb at a startlingly early age, it is little wonder that in the past few years several of the denominations that once took a more open position on abortion have retreated somewhat: the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is now studying the issue; in a 1980 statement on social principles, the UMC moved to a more qualified position; the Episcopal Church and the recently formed Evangelical Lutheran Church in America seem to be in the process of toning down their earlier positions (or those of a predecessor body) The Lutherans defeated a resolution in their 1989 Assembly which would have been consistent with the liberal position of the LCA predecessor body, and a 1988 Lutheran - Episcopal dialogue report refers to the fetus as «embryonic humanity» with claims on society.

In thus explaining and championing religious pluralism on affirmative theological grounds rather than on negative or concessionary ones, liberal Protestants could make one of the more important of their distinctive contributions to the moral coherence «and consensus that our sprawling society needs but has found it difficult to maintain.

The usual assertions are (1) that this kind of religion is today on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing of «conservative churches» (although the alleged liberal enervation is also seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and conservative churches is itself the result of widespread reaction against «secular humanist» values and against those who hold such values; (4) that our society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in moral consensus, a loss of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind of benchmark — as a time before the fall.

In 1925 the Protestant churches were much more liberal, relative to the society around them, than they are today.

Stirred by the steady stream of feminist literature which has caused a revolution in Western society, and prodded by the more liberal wing of the church which opened up the discussion on the ordination of women twenty or more years ago, contemporary evangelicals have become increasingly interested in reevaluating the role of women.

If the liberal type is less bound by the Bible, creed and tradition and more concerned with the demands of reason and contemporary society, the conservative type tends to be the opposite.

Is there nothing more here than an appeal for an aristocratic spirit of service to society in a bourgeois liberal world?

Religious privatism saps the liberal churches of their strength perhaps more than anything else in modern society.

Yet I can think of no more conformist message in liberal societies than the idea that students should learn to think for themselves.

It too has more or less liberal and conservative expressions, with the former leaning toward communitarianism (a kind of unlikely hybrid of socialism and capitalism that Alasdair MacIntyre once rather dryly called «going to bed with the phone company») and the latter stressing traditional morality and trying to resist the rationalizing trends of modern society.

Johnson, out of his own liberal roots, spoke boldly of building the Great Society, but the streets of this land were increasingly unsafe even for the president, who more and more found himself to be a virtual prisoner in the White House.

Within liberal churches we need movements stressing a more vital personal religious experience — so long as that experience is enriched by all the knowledge about nature, persons and society which God has more recently revealed through responsible science.

A common feature of this minority is a desire, expressed in rhetoric that runs from liberal to leftist, to achieve a society that is more humanly fulfilling and which extends its benefits to all persons.

I view the rise of liberal societies more as usefully compensatory, but also as a kind of divine rod, a Joab bringing with him a (misplaced) order for a failed David.

It is at least conceivable that liberal societies such as West Germany, Great Britain, France, and the United States pay a more just respect to the rights of persons on the one hand and, on the other hand, to the building up of intermediate social bodies through reflection and choice than do some existing Catholic countries.

Yup, and the Liberals are more than happy to boast that they want to protect these murderers among our society.

So could we have any information about any existing democratic societies which have got close to that «more egalitarian liberal market» approach?

on the face of it the American left are socially liberal but the bottom line is the more control they take over the economy and the redistribution of wealth, the more power they will gain over society at large and the more power they will have to implement social engineering projects.

Robert Page asks: Instead of skirmishing with the Conservatives and Liberals over «ownership» of the «progressive» label do you think that that the Labour Party should define itself unambiguously as a socialist party which believes that the state has a positive and active role to play in creating a more equal society?

In a liberal society, people should be free to have the odd drink or two, but tackling binge drinking requires encouraging more people to do so responsibly and minimising the number who drink harmfully.

Isn't a justified liberal response to this that if you have evidence that gun liberalisation in your society would lead to more not less gun crime, than gun control is a legitimate liberal response?

In a society that has become ever more individualised and where people's social lives are no longer rooted in their local working men's clubs or liberal associations, that decline is unsurprising.

Instead of sticking our heads in the sand and burying Britain in more and more debt, I am proud that Liberal Democrats in Government remain committed to an agenda that is reducing the deficit, supporting those who work hard and want to get on in life and ensuring that we can deliver a stronger economy in a fairer society.»

Yet, gun control politics (and other related issues of weapon ownership, self - defense, etc) are the opposite of this; liberal beliefs are about lowering the amount of weapons available to the individual and in overall society, while the conservative stance is about granting more freedom of ownership.

Campaigners such as the Electoral Reform Society and the Liberal Democrats want a fully proportional system where the number of seats a party wins is more closely aligned with the number of votes they get.

Like all Liberals, he understood an enduring truth, that as the state becomes ever more powerful, society becomes less liberal.

«We are already the most watched society in the world and yet ministers want more snooping powers,» said Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne of reports that development of an advanced monitoring system is already underway.

His political brand was built on compromising with Republicans to get results, a government of action rather than a «debating society,» appealing to moderate voters who rated him more highly than liberals.

The more secure a society, the more liberal and tolerant its people.

Driving this change is a new generation of chief executives and chief marketing officers who have more liberal values than their predecessors and find themselves facing growing pressure to use their positions of power to do right by society.

And although religion continues to play a vital role in life and in the very conceptualization of marriage, today in a more liberal and tolerant society, the meaning of marriage is arguably more focused on the heart of the matter - love.

As society has become more liberal and gender roles have diversified, the meaning of marriage has also changed.

If you want to date Indian women, keep in mind that South India is still incredibly conservative whereas the North and West tend to be more liberal about Indian dating in society.

Depending on where you live, more than likely, society as a whole is far more liberal than it was when you first dated.

More proof that those in touch with Iceland's musical spirit animal are blessed with an ability to capture profound emotion through unusual means, American - born Alex Somers» work with the band Sigur Ros (and its essential continuation with its bandmate as Jonsi and Alex) now yields a score of singular spirituality as Somers tracks a family of ultra liberals who've have truly gone off society's reservation.

As many liberals and conservatives push for national academic standards and other centralizing education reforms, this situation brilliantly illustrates why government schooling is totally antithetical to a free society, and why the more centralized the power, the greater the danger.

Both policies, stagflation and financial repression, come about because the government and central bank are trying to force the economy to do more than it can do, leading to greater poverty on the low end of society, leaving aside the fine - sounding words of the liberals.

Now working days of Old English bulldog were numbered but the New World was a more liberal and open society for barbaric entertainment and new fashion.

Each project questions the formalist and invariable interpretations of the Qu» ran prevalent in the Saudi judicial systems that sit opposed to more liberal undercurrents within contemporary Saudi society.