Sentences with phrase «more life argument»

Not exact matches

But recently it also turned up something unexpected — a rare argument against making space for more learning in your life.

In spite of this data, you could make an argument for people holding more stocks in their portfolios for the simple fact that people are living longer than ever, so maybe they need more stocks to grow their money in retirement:

Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, presented a more hopeful view of the case to Capital, and suggested that the Florida jury would be moved by their argument that Hogan had turned his own sex life into a public spectacle long before Gawker published this tape.

Opponents of Catholic moral teaching, whether inside or outside the Church, seldom give actual arguments; more often, they demonize the «harsh,» «obsessive,» «judgmental» Catholic who emphasizes dogma and wants to tell others how to live their lives.

By my reading of both the human condition and our current culture, a project like Hart's is more important to the status of religion in public life than, say, arguments for a natural law.

I'm sure you can type a long and boring argument that shows you think it is, but there is more to life than being rational.

We can go around the track once more on all the arguments about «right to life» and «right to death.»

The same argument applies to the life and medical insurance premiums people pay because there is no cheaper, more efficient public program for dealing with the costs of medical care and old - age security.

As the years went on, Richard seemed to grow ever more knowledgeable, poised, intellectually many - sided, and well informed about the vast array of conflicts, arguments, clashing ambitions, and hidden purposes that mark our national civic life.

More important, this would do away with that correspondence of the Lord's Resurrection with our own which was fundamental to Paul's argument about future life and is vitally important for our own belief about it.

To arrive at the God of Christian Theism, other evidences can be offered in addition to this more basic one (e.g. aspects of natural theology, historical arguments for the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, alleged special revelation, etc.).

Stronger than every obstacle and counter — argument is the instinct which tells us that, to be faithful to Life, we must know; we must know more and still more; we must tirelessly and unceasingly search for Something, we know not what, which will appear in the end to those who have penetrated to the very heart of reality.

I am a scientist, and more importantly for this argument, a mathematician, and I can say that even the largest statistics creationists manage to make up would still allow life to form naturally.

Even in its more sophisticated guise, such as the argument of Immanuel Kant that life in heaven is to be a due adjustment of affairs after the obvious evil known and experienced in mundane life, there is for many people little meaning.

If suffering is probable, says the quality of life argument, it is more merciful and just in some instances to terminate life rather than let it continue.

Likewise, some of the «unconverted,» perhaps particularly among those with strong religious convictions, may yet be moved by more idealistic arguments for a different sense of what human life as such deserves, the horror of a particular individual's behavior notwithstanding.

The improbability of intelligent life is not in doubt while the argument about the degree of improbability is more a matter of «philosophical» science.

Attempts have often been made to show that this man never lived, that he is entirely the product of early Christian imagination, but these attempts have at no time succeeded in convincing more than a few, and it is inconceivable that they would ever convince the Christian, for the event whose historicity is to him more than the conclusion of an argument but is witnessed to by his own being as a Christian — this event includes the appearance in history of this man.

Joy itself is evangelical, and people are more easily shocked by a happy, chaste Christian than they are by hearing about statistical studies of homosexuality or even philosophical arguments, such as sexual acts having intrinsic meaning and being open to new life.

In his more important argument Altizer says that God's dying to himself so as to become fully one with all men can have a ground in the very life of the Catholic Church in that the Church is not only not bound to any past images of herself, but her very goal and mission is to open up to and be incorporated into the entire world.

This is not an argument from design (in that case, it is not possible to find more than that what is given in nature itself); it is a true transcendental argument, looking for the conditions of possibility of those features that are truly exhibited by the world in which we live, and without which that world would not be conceivable.

Economists tend to promote economics as an ideology, partly by acts of omission in their teaching, but more often by explicit arguments that lead to the acceptance of economics as the first and most fundamental science of public life.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

To make the claim not only begins the argument but, more important, creates expectations in others that should help me live nonviolently.

You refute odds and say we don't have a clue through science the probability of life and further more the reason / occurrence of why we have life but your trying to build a argument against the idea of an intelligent designer through science.

Or of the reality that with new life comes swollen breasts, dry heaves, dirty diapers, snotty noses, late - night arguments, and a whole army of new dangers and fears she never even considered before because life - giving isn't nearly as glamorous as it sounds, but it's a thousand times more beautiful.

I feel remarkably blessed to be faced with little more than petty arguments and silly resentments in my life... especially in a world of so much injustice.

Bernstein now joins with Marco Politi, veteran Vatican correspondent for La Repubblica, to expand the «Holy Alliance» argument and wed it to a more comprehensive account of John Paul II's life and papal ministry.

Certainly no argument against it can be based upon the fact that every year we are able to move faster from one point to another, and to destroy more human lives with less expenditure of time and trouble.

His first fourteen paragraphs make a chillingly accurate presentation of the arguments of the more articulate pro — life «shooters.»

He develops his argument against atypically atheistic Darwinism around the fact of evolutionary convergence: «The central point is that because organisms arrive repeatedly at the same biological solution... this provides not only a degree of predictability, but more intriguingly points to a deeper structure to life...» His viewpoint is quite clear: «Metric - sized animals that are the end - result of many billions of years of prior stellar and biological evolution may be the only way to allow at least one species to begin its encounter with God.

For him, civilization was the process of humans growing more civilized, the victory of persuasion, not just in the sense of rational arguments but as a manner of living, over brute force.

Second, I'd like to point you to a handful of books and studies that make compelling arguments for incorporating more vegan - centric meals into your life.

We're getting way off base into a semantics argument that is even more irrelevant to life than our actual conversation at hand (which is also still pretty irrelevant to life).

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

No argument here about life being more complicated with kids.

There is a generally a good argument and practicalities of living as a Catholic minimalist, but it could have used more depth as to the why.

Does Mr. Brownback not factor in the fact that most people still need to spend a minimum amount of money to live in modern society (food, shelter, etc.), and it is those people who can not afford to spend more than a minimum that consumption taxes affect the most (which, as you noted, has often been an argument for income tax)?

We find the suggestion that this is the real reason for the MPA far more compelling than we do the argument that our return would be detrimental to the island, particularly when 1,500 servicemen and 2,000 civilian workers currently live there.

Our inequality attitudes work suggests this broad «quality of life» case for fairness and greater equality has quite a lot of resonance across social groups, and often more than a «who's got what» argument about fairness.

But Stephen would expect to win the argument that «we should get the state out of people's lives a bit more».

Central to their argument is an understanding that the survival of all living creatures is limited by the concept of energy return on investment (EROI): that any living thing or living societies can survive only so long as they are capable of getting more net energy from any activity than they expend during the performance of that activity.

«That,» he says, «is a kind of new biology that I find a million times more interesting than these specious arguments over whether life begins at fertilization.»

One of the arguments for such a large federal investment in research is that it will lead to new and more effective treatments for diseases — leading to reduced healthcare costs, leading to more disposable income, leading to economic prosperity and the continued unbridled freedom of American citizens to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

By holding their limbs directly beneath their bodies, the argument went, dinosaurs would have moved faster and more efficiently than the cousins of crocodiles and relatives of early mammals that also lived at the time.

Weiss: To me, that's one of the most gratifying things that if we can make the argument that science is something everybody gets benefit from, not materially, but in their heads when they think about what the world is like and how comfortable or uncomfortable they are with the world, it gives you something to stew about and makes life a lot more interesting.

So one central argument against the existence of alien life — the «rare Earth» argument that environments to host it must be rare — has been more or less disproven.

Though always a complex decision medically and emotionally, she's past her childbearing and breastfeeding years, and the quality of life given by peace of mind that you'll more than likely be there for your kids is an argument winner for many women over keeping their breasts.

My friend, who I will leave unamed, just made the argument that wild game is healthier to eat than non-organic plants with all their pesticides, so it is healthier and more affordable for him to keep eating wild meat and some organic vegetables than it would be for him to switch to a vegan life style where he would have to consume more non-organics.