Sentences with phrase «more lost policy»

The NAIC has more lost policy advice on its website.

Not exact matches

Despite (or more likely, because of) its simplified language and helpful explain - y graphics, Facebook's updated policy will likely do nothing to allay Americans fears that «they've lost control over the way their personal data is collected and used.»

In addition to the aforementioned reasons (to finance governmental spending and make up for lost tax revenue), the Treasury has wanted to hold a more robust cash - balance position as a matter of prudent policy in order to protect against a potential interruption in market access.

Stephen Poloz is going to get more questions on fiscal policy tomorrow than the NDP lost seats in Quebec.

To answer your second question, yes, you can not lose more than you have invested, IQ Option has negative balance protection policy (so it will automatically close the trade when the price goes too much in the opposite direction).

Reciprocal - solidarity policies would offer a deal to wage - earners: You will work more years, but if you take a less physically demanding job as you age, you won't lose your healthcare benefits or find that your earnings collapse just as your body starts breaking down.

Atinkut Mezgebu Wubneh representing the Ethiopian Region of Tigray accepts Gold Future Policy Award 2017 A third of the planet's land is severely degraded and fertile soil is being lost at the rate of 24bn tons a year, says the Global Land Outlook launched at the... more

but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer policy buying for the future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....

One might argue that the Democrats (in both houses) have more to lose, with several of their members who are running for Congress perhaps enjoying the insurance policy that two primaries brings — the option to run for their current seats if a bid for higher office doesn't work out.

«Until protectionist policies, currency manipulation and theft of intellectual property ends America will lose more jobs.

Unlike MPs elected more recently Watson and McDonnell, very different politicians, have decades of experience, years of mistakes to learn from, battles fought and lost, leadership crises, leadership bids, policies framed and re-framed.

You would have to establish that the total tax paid by the election winning voters was more than the total tax paid by the election losing voters to make any valid claim about taxes paid and policy preferences.

Ordinary voters will only be alarmed if they think Tory policy is actually more destructive rather than being worried if a few nurses and policemen lose their jobs (they're far more likely to worry about their own jobs and security than that of public sector workers).

Just because Carl Paladino lost doesn't make far more responsible fiscal policies any less urgent.

The Empire Center for Public Policy, a pro-free market think tank, estimates unions stand to lose more than $ 110 million — nearly 13 percent of their total collections — as agency fee payers who pay partial dues would be able to fully opt out of making any payments to the unions.

Staten Island is the only borough de Blasio lost in the 2013 mayoral election and locals haven't warmed to him or many of his more progressive policies since.

It seems they are more concerned with winning public support (or at least not losing it) than they are about their policies and their underlying political philosophy.

If Corbyn does lose then I think this will be down to how much people dislike Corbyn's leadership and his public perception rather than the ideas in this manifesto, but do you think that the more right - leaning aspects of the party will use this to attempt to sweep away all the Corbyn policies that are proposed in this manifesto in a bid to be seen as «more electable» when the next election comes around?

In more stable political times, at this point in the parliament, the opposition would be analysing why it lost a general election and reconsidering its policy offer in the light of defeat.

If middle class labour members continue to push progressive policies they may even lose even more of the traditional working class vote.

By the time he was replaced by Grayling, they seemed to have completely lost interest in it, or simply to have forsaken it in the name of other policy areas, like free school meals, where they thought there were more votes.

In my opinion, an opportunity for substantive policy reforms may have been lost - we refused to deregulate the downstream oil sector; we have not made new investments in our upstream more attractive to investors; we have not made any privatisations since 2015; NNPC remains opaque and indeed is now worse with evidently poor governance and low transparency!

«If Rangel loses there will be some personnel shifts and Dominicans will have more access to power, but they'll realize they still need to work with blacks and other Latinos,» said Angelo Falcón, president of the National Institute for Latino Policy.

They are among a number of the Windrush generation who have been threatened with deportation by the Home Office or have lost access to public services as a result of Tory changes to immigration policy - despite living legally in the UK for more than 50 years.

With the Tories having lost their overall majority it is somewhat moot whether any of the more distinctive policies in the Tory manifesto would command a majority.

59 % of people agreed that Labour had «seriously lost touch with ordinary working people» (including 30 % of Labour's own supporters), 70 % that «Labour need to make major changes to their policies and beliefs to be fit for government again» (including 50 % of Labour voters), 61 % agreed that «Labour still haven't faced up to the damage they did to the British economy» and 50 % agreed that «If Labour returned to government they would put the country into even more debt».

The reason the last three elections were lost was not due to the policies of the Conservative leader (though including some of the policies mentioned above would have helped enormously), but a combination of Blair's spin - based popularity, and electoral unfairness (the Conservatives gained more votes than Labour, at least in England).

Foreign policy in the limelight It was global affairs night in Bristol, bringing more media attention than at any time since Tony Benn lost his seat as an MP.

While that policy could put increased pressure on journalism outlets to use the information they glean from FOIL requests in stories more quickly, to avoid losing the competitive edge, good government groups said it could also help the larger public.

According to a 2014 analysis by the National Committee of Scientific Research (CoNRS), which advises the CNRS on science policy issues and participates in the recruitment of young researchers, the CNRS alone has lost more than 800 permanent positions between 2002 and 2012.

Split Decision: Two Incumbents Losing in Denver School Board Elections, Two Supporters of District Policies Prevail (Chalkbeat) Quotes Martin West: «There are signs in the national election results this week that Democrats may make significant headway at the state and local level next year when many more seats are in play, and that typically makes it harder to pursue the traditional reform agenda.

Often lost in the debate over these policies is a more basic question: do they benefit the students who receive automatic admissions?

Washington — The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling that legislative vetoes are unconstitutional may force legislators to be more precise in drafting bills, but the Congress is unlikely to lose much authority over key education policy issues, according to knowledgeable observers.

Bought this truck with 7800 miles on it and had 4 recalls in less than a year the factory bedliner in it is separating from the steel and everytiei take it to the shop and its supposed to be a work truck made tough that's a joke due to the manufacturer defects I have to miss using it on jobs to haul and if you ask for a loaner that is not included in the warranty so I have a ram that is causing me to lose money and the company wont give me a truck to use while its getting manufacturer defects fixed makes sense and well trading it in is a joke after you buy a ram they depreciate dramatically so trading it in will cost you so thought since they changed names maybe they would b better but 2 hours on the hotline about why no loaner for a working man and all I get is there is no loaner policy when your vehicle is in the shop even when it is their flaws!And what really ticked me off they wanted to patch the factory sprayed bedliner so I took it in and dropped it off we had a big hail storm and they left my truck out in it and they aren't responsible for that either and you pay 600 for a factory sprayed bedliner and its peeling up and they want to patch that spot instead of respraying the whole thing can u say cheap but they were more than happy to take my money when I bought it but they don't stand very tough in my opinion never had this many issues with my fords

To learn more about whether filing a claim means losing your policy, contact the renters insurance experts at Effective Coverage at [phone].

Since an MEC can not be reversed, you need to understand that you are losing the tax advantages associated with a life insurance policy and that you will be left with, essentially, a life insurance policy that functions more as a non-qualified retirement account than a life insurance contract.

That's because there's more of an opportunity to settle the loss within the policy limit and make everyone happy by giving them some portion of what was lost.

For example, some policies state that if the policyholder does not die as a result of the accident and instead loses a limb, he / she will only receive a 50 % benefit payout, while losing two or more limbs would result in a full benefit payment.

Benefits from life insurance policies are designed to replace «lost» income; they usually provide significantly more than you've paid into the policy.

The more you have to lose, the more you may need extra insurance in the form of a Texas umbrella insurance policy.

You'll get higher Kingston insurance quotes if you want replacement cost coverage on your homeowner's policy, but it might be worth it knowing that you'd have more cash to replace any lost items.

«More frequent job changes place policy holders at risk for losing their life insurance coverage.»

PLEASE NOTE, because dogs are more likely to be reunited with their owner when they are brought to a shelter in their own neighborhood, the Quebec Street Shelter in Denver does not take in lost dogs (see our Lost & Found pet admission policies below for more informatilost dogs (see our Lost & Found pet admission policies below for more informatiLost & Found pet admission policies below for more information).

More than 10 million pets are lost each year, and one in three pets will be lost at some point in its lifetime, according to the National Council of Pet Population Study & Policy and the National Humane Society.

Over the weekend, American Express Platinum members lost lounge access to American Airlines Admirals Clubs and US Airways Clubs.This policy change was announced in the beginning of December... [Read more...] about AmEx Platinum Statement Credit for Losing AA / US Lounges

With just three super airlines now ruling the US Aviation industry, policies which use to be somewhat consumer friendly are lost as the three major airlines are positioned to make more money than ever before and competition dwindles.

It also makes for disastrous policy — if we'd had a more sustainable, independent energy mix in the the years since Jimmy Carter lost to Ronald Reagan, we'd be much better off in the world today.

But — in the political battles to come — Labor has much more to lose than it will ever hope to gain in taking a policy position that is nothing more than a naked attempt to prop up its mates running Union Super funds and near - bankrupt cowboys like Infigen — at the expense of the poorest and most vulnerable; struggling businesses; and cash - strapped families.

So if you are losing the science and policy wars, create a strawman of an entity that can be more easily made into a charicature (sp?).

Rudge, a member of Lord Lawson's climate denial think tank the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), accepts that he must pay up the # 1,000 he lost when he bet Chris Hope, a Cambridge University researcher, in 2011 that 2015 would be more than 0.1 C cooler than 2008.