Sentences with phrase «more lost profits»

We've tried that, bu the property just sits and doesn't rent out, which costs us more lost profits in the long run.

This means banks will now need to make up even more lost profits via their customers.

Not exact matches

Critics point to MDC's lack of overall profits and its huge amount of debt as signs of a company making more bets than it can afford to lose, (this, despite its increased revenues, organic growth and free cash flow).

Indeed, IE lives within the Windows division — Microsoft's core business, and a major source of revenue (about $ 19 billion a year) and profit (about $ 12 billion a year), while Microsoft Advertising is part of the Online group, which is on track to lose more than $ 2 billion this year.

Over the last three months, Apple grew its revenues by 33 %, saw its profits increase by 38 % to $ 10.7 billion, put away more than $ 202 billion in cash for a rainy day — and yet lost more than $ 60 billion in market value in just three minutes on Tuesday.

April 25 AT&T Inc reported lower - than - expected quarterly profit on Wednesday as the No. 2 U.S. wireless carrier lost subscribers from its pay TV business, sending its shares down more than 3 percent after the close of trading.

Meanwhile, business owners still profit more from lower labor costs than they lose from either lower sales or less robust productivity gains.

Because Nadex charges a flat fee per contract rather than reaping a profit when losing trades are made like a broker does, when you stay at Nadex, they make more money.

(Reuters)- AT&T Inc (T.N) reported lower - than - expected quarterly profit on Wednesday as the No. 2 U.S. wireless carrier lost subscribers from its pay TV business, sending its shares down more than 3 percent after the close of trading.

At this price, we believe the company is attractively valued even if it loses most of the Acthar profits to competition, which we think is possible, but not likely for several more years.

Food companies must add value to the original ingredients in order to turn a profit — but the more they add, the more consumers seem to lose.

When none of those things are available, those seeking personal profit in one or more of those areas lose interest quickly.

They may stand more to gain than to lose, if their creativity is subject to common good considerations rather than to corporate profit motives.

This is entirely down to the board AND Wenger, he's lost the plot and the board are more than happy because the profit margin stays up and the expenditure stays waaay low.

this is what Giroud profited from that's aside the many he still missed and the historic goal drought of the 2nd half of the season which made Ozil unable to to break Henry's assist - record and more importantly made us lose the title.

Parrots will always parrot, they absolutely can not adapt their thoughts or speech even in light of new information, they do not understand the difference between having influence and having power, they do not understand that as INFLUENTIAL as Wenger has been at Arsenal over the years, he ultimately does not have the POWER to sign the cheques that bring in players, not Fergie, not Mourinho, not Guardiola have such or ever had such far reaching powers, that a manager, no matter how popular, have to suck up to the guys at the top one way or another, Mourinho lost twice to the ego of the top hierarchy at Chelsea, at Madrid too... No manager can achieve anything tangible under the conditions that Wenger has been working, of course Wenger cares about the finances of the club but like Dein, it's more about a sustainable development and not just shortsighted profit making like Gazidis and Kroenke.

I am no accountant but from what I understand the difference between accounting profit and economic profit is that the latter also factors in costs related to lost opportunity had the capital been invested more wisely elsewhere.

For a start you're not questioning why working class socialist labour voters went Ukip in the first place, it wasn't some guardian reading, snobbery that the working class are think, therefore are bigoted, so they must vote UKIP as they're nasty right wingers who dint like immigration, the decrease in wages among blue collar workers, due to immigration, is by the bosses seeking immigration to pay lower wages to make themselves more profits, Appeasing implies going along with something through fear of something worse, to agree with controlling immigration, because ex labour voters are going UKIP isn't appeasing it, why would us being afraid of losing is our votes to.

The truth is that the first step to losing weight and getting fit is to constantly learn about fitness and health and I hate to admit that more than half of the blogs out there exist only to make profit, and in reality have nothing to do with health and nutrition knowledge.

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows lost a little more than half of its week one profits, leaving it with about $ 17.8 million while Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked saw a more modest drop of 42.7 % and took $ 13.3 million for weekend two.

In the capitol, the union won some accountability and transparency fights — prohibiting for - profit organizations from running charters, making charters adhere to state comptroller audits, and demanding they serve more special education and ELL students — but lost the bigger issues of saturation and the cap, which legislators agreed to raise from 200 to 460.

But while Edison, the New York City - based company whose educational program does include free computers, has lost hundreds of millions of dollars and fallen out of favor with investors, National Heritage last year turned a small profit managing more than two dozen...

Despite that we do not cherry pick books and we do not limit ourselves to already established authors C) We're sensible enough to realize that a win - win - win relationship / partnership where authors profit, where we profit, and where readers profit will benefit all parties much more than some arrangement where one party gets greedy and ends up losing its partners.

It has often sounded like there might be more than a few over-the-road shipping companies gunning to not lose out on the current profit that Amazon's current shipping methods generate.

That decline in profits you describe is also basic economics: When a market becomes more competitive, the legacy players usually * do * lose some of their original marketshare.

End result, publishers slit their own throat as more profit is lost as people are forced to go the free route to see if something's worth buying.

My money management rules were as follows: (1) Never risk more than half as much as the reasonable potential reward (e.g., don't risk more than 10 pips if your reasonable take profit point is less than 20 pips), and (2) never risk on any one trade an amount that would draw down your total trading capital by more than 10 % (that's my «make sure you don't blow out your account» rule — I'm fairly confident of my ability to avoid putting on 10 losing trades in a row, trading as I do as a scalper and short term swing trader).

Now, instead of a losing trade you potentially have a winning trade, and instead of losing 1R you've profited 2 or 3R or even more... that's a major difference in your trading account value.

You might invest only in profitable companies (ones that make money and probably pay regular dividends), thus excluding something like an oil exploration company, which will just lose money, and lose it, and lose some more, forever... unless it hits the jackpot, in which case you might suddenly find yourself sitting on a huge profit.

If I find sources of sugar that I can resell and make a profit, I haven't «lost» anything simply because another guy who buys it from me can make more money by selling it further down the supply chain.

In fact, according to New America, since the change in the credit standard went into effect, for - profit colleges have lost about $ 790 million more in PLUS loan disbursements than HBCUs.

Always take enough profit to pay for your trade, and never risk more than you can afford to lose.

Take your profits when your targets get hit, don't change targets in an effort to try and get «just a little bit more» profit... These attempts to get a «little more profit» are usually in vain, and they usually lead to you letting a winning trade turn into a losing trade.

The more volatile something is the more you stand to profit, or lose from fluctuation.

If the intraday trader is affected by fear, he may book the profits too early and lose the potential to earn more; however, if he books the profit too late, affected by greed, he may lose all that he earned.

It is a continuous process of making more profits and cutting down loses which might not ensure a win every time, but it wins the war.

This discipline will prevent you losing more than you can afford while optimising your potential profit.

Take note that while it is possible to increase your profit potential with leverage trading, the risk of losing more than what you invested also increases when you use leverage.

The fear of bankruptcy and the fear of losing assets will often lead people to the clutches of lenders that care more for their profits than they do about you as a customer.

It can make a profit on its sales activities, or it might lose money by spending more than it brings in from sales.

You need to lose the belief that more opportunities equals more profits, because in trading this is not the case.

This is more difficult to achieve because a reduction would mean the creditor loses profit.

However, by choosing a Wall Street insider, Steven Mnuchin, as his Treasury secretary appointee, Mr. Trump has shown that he prioritizes the profits of the big banks and their executives» outrageous salaries more than he does the average American who is simply struggling to pay their mortgage - or, even worse, who has already lost their home.

Yup, over-confident and even «cocky» after making some profits that leads out the trading plan and risk is more scary than losing under controlled - trades.

Obviously, this is not a real track record, but the point still stands; when you take more trades you are naturally going to have to endure more losing trades which will need to be offset by more winning trades just to achieve the same profit factor.

Courageous capital owners who hunker down and fight against the natural human instinct to eliminate whatever inflicts pain and loss (and to seek more of what gives joy and profit) are rewarded both by keeping current yield and regaining lost capital as prices rebound to fair value.

That's good enough profit than losing more.

While two of my naked puts finished with a full profit, the third contract lost more than I gained on the first two.

-- Experts say they're a headache, issuers rarely offer it, yet the co-signed credit card may be making a comeback as a more - regulated industry searches for lost profits... (more) 4 questions to ask before you co-sign on a credit card — Explore alternatives and find out what you're in for with these questions for anyone who asks you to be a co-signer on a credit car or other loan... (more) Issuer of 79.9 percent interest rate credit card defends its product — Subprime credit card marketers are looking for ways around new restrictions on sky - high fees for bad credit cards.

Perhaps more importantly, if the market reversed back higher, a trader did not lose the opportunity to profit on the initial long position (see «Facing the gap,» above).