Sentences with phrase «more money going out»

Is more money going out than is coming in?

Is there more money going out than coming in?

Do you have more money going out than coming in?

Not exact matches

If the company isn't «blowing up,» when the founder goes out to raise more money and the original VCs / Angels who invested don't lead or participate in the new round, it sends an very bad signal to other potential new investors.

(When they don't develop) a product or service that's more innovative and desirable than what your competitors are offering, and (when they don't) keep an eye on money coming in and going out so that you're not in a deficit, or if you are, coming up with a recovery plan and having the discipline to stay with it.»

When I moved to New York City two years ago on an intern's salary, my priority was staying afloat: making sure more money was coming in than going out, even if I was netting just $ 20 a month.

Here is a little secret: If there is something that you truly want next year — such as more money, more support or an amazing mentor — go out and give it away.

If you burn the money up, go out and raise more money.

So in practice, if you are young software developer or entrepreneur in San Francisco, you can choose to work at a start - up that will have a more than 50 percent chance of going out of business in the next 18 months without risking the embarrassment of running out of money and having to move back in with your parents.

Money is moving out of iron ore but where it goes next is the more interesting question, because it seems that some investors are developing a taste for agriculture — a shift that might prove to be a case of leaving the frying pan to land in the fire.

And if you have created the best, your figures will add up at the end of the year, and you'll have more money coming in than going out, and you can employ some accountants to work out the difference between net and gross.»

«Even though you're not exactly a tourist, you'll probably still spend more money on, say, going out to eat, than you would back home,» for instance.

It means that they've run out of the money they raised in their Series A, and they've either got to raise more or pack it up and go home.

In 1995, when Father Bernard McCoy moved in to the Cistercian Abbey of Our Lady of Spring Bank in rural Sparta, Wis., he had much more to do than pray for nearly five hours a day: He needed to figure out how to earn enough money to keep the abbey going.

Fredrick Petrie, author of «The End of Work: Financial Planning for People With Better Things To Do,» recommends «taxing» yourself in order to get more money out of your wallet and into the bank — this way you'll make savings a priority from the get - go, rather than budgeting everything else first and then seeing what is left over for savings.

So no one will give you more money and you go out of business.

From 1987 when Greenspan took over for Volcker, our economy went from 150 percent debt to GDP to 390 percent as we had these easy money policies moving people more and more out the risk curve.

The reason more people don't have high networths is because they don't want to cut out all the «little crap» they spend money on: coffee in the morning, going out to lunch, going out to dinner, going to a movie, buying that thing you will never use, letting your food spoil, having to pay interest on your credit card... congrats, there goes your earnings.

If they know Patreon isn't going to run out of money any time soon, they may be more enthusiastic about building a subscriber base for the long - run on the platform.

The operative notion of easy money is that you create $ 32 billion in bank reserves, the banks lend out the money, the money gets spent, more loans happen, and through the magic of the «money multiplier», the amount of loans in the economy goes up by many times that $ 32 billion.

Well, it will certainly lift the rate of return investors expect from stocks, but bulls insists that with earnings growing 20 percent this year, the expected return may be sufficiently high, so that there will not be any shift out of equities, that corporations are going to make enough money to more than compensate for higher rates.

My old puts expired safely out of the money and I'm going back for more.

«Graduates are being forced to shell out more money,» says Ramsay, and that means less going into savings.

The associated fees could more than cancel out the money that you're going to earn.

And all along, investors bought the argument: Even if the number of pay TV subscribers had stalled, the big media companies seemed as though they were going to wring more money out of the customers they did have — and could sell more stuff to Web TV entrants like Netflix and Amazon.

However, if your company is just starting out and won't be processing more than a couple thousand dollars per month, you should go with processors like Square or Stripe to save the most money.

You can spend lots of money to go out and find the right people via traditional channels — cold calling, print advertising or trade shows — but it's far more efficient to do things that help your customers find you.

Servicers left borrowers in the lurch — some went out of business, while others saw that they could make more money by foreclosing than by modifying loans.

Therefore, this has become a more viable alternative for companies to borrow money and go out and acquire these larger forms.

Since more money is going in than out, we've had a nice long run in the stock market, but it seems like it can't go on forever, and at some point we may look back and call this somewhat of a bubble.

If prices went up, I wanted to be able to pull more money out of the REIT to buy a home and vice versa.

When he returned, he found that two of the servants went out, and worked to trade them to make more money.

They could point out that more money could be earned if some members of a family would go to the city to work in a factory.

@@@@@ WIMPY WASP explained it when earthquakes and floods and famine hit really hard then most crazy broke really religious people who don't have a job go crazy like you.you religious people don't give back in my last three years I given back too helping the poor more then $ 20,000 dallors of my own money how much you so called chicken heads crazy religious people given out of your own income wait you crazy religious people got ta pay your light bill.by the way I own my own commercial health base buisness in Arizona.you still working for a pay check I write employees paychecks.

It may be case, now more than ever, that if you're going to get old you'd better be rich, and we are entering an era when it's going to be harder than ever to figure out how to make your money last as long as you do.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Then after keeping the new bible out of the people hands claiming it was to important for any peasant to read or hold, they effectively usurped the mediator position between the people and God and started raking in the cash that position offers, for on one hand, what shows your faith more than giving of your money, and on the other hand, whats God going to do with all this coin?

If you take everything you spend on eating out, going to movies, taking trips, and «enjoying life» and it comes to more than 10 % of your annual income, you might actually want to cut back on the amount of money you are «tithing» to your family, and spend more on loving and serving others, helping the poor, taking care of orphans and widows, and showing others the love of Jesus.

Buying more because it is on sale and tossing it out later on because it has gone bad doesn't save any money at all!

As I'm still a student and working only part - time I've also made the decision to spend more money on food than other stuff like clothing or going out etc..

If you are like me, you probably have a base of 4 - 5 flours that you use regularly, and when you see a recipe with someone else's gluten free flour mix, you do your best to make do with what you own rather than going out to spend even more money at the store — cause let's face it — gluten free ingredients often bring a whole new definition to pricey groceries.

As he sees it, when people are desperate and out of work, crime goes up, liability litigation cases are filed more frequently and everyone does whatever they can to make a little money to survive.

Robert Dickman believes while families might not go out to eat as often these days, grocery shoppers will spend more money on meals at home.

And although we're not suggesting you go out and hit the dumpsters, these less, um, messy ways to cut down on food waste will help you become a smarter shopper, eat more of those groceries you diligently buy each week, and save money.

this kid had it all and could have been truly great but guess what, you can take the kid out of the hood but you can't always take the hood out of the kid, sterling hangs around with a bunch of idiots who think posting their mate online doing laughing gas is clever and there all living in London, bringing him in would be a huge mistake in my opinion and those of you suggesting to offer theo and money, Im so glad you don't run the club, theo is the best r winger in the league when fit, we also have Wellington silva coming back, not to mention ox to cover or Sanchez if we want to play Danny or mezut on the left, let city have Raheem and let their already volatile dressing room implode, let's get Cech, lacazette and a solid dm to compete with le coq, sell Chesney to inter for good money podolski could be used as make weight for Morgan or the like release flamini let arteta and Roz have there last season if they choose or let them go if they want more first team football, Rio to have one more loan Diaby pay as you play and last promote chuba who clearly is going to be an animal, with this I believe the title is ours and if the new 3 settle a real tilt at the cl is possible but please gooners get behind theo he is absolutely essential COYG

Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.

also sell campbell with him signing a new contract we should get good money for him and spanish teams seem to like him, poldoski also out, theo if he is not happy with being a team player he can also go i think he is paying the price for holding us to ransom in his last deal he wanted more money and assurances he, ll be playing as a CF not good enough also sanogo should be sold for his own good and do a chamack will be playing better & regularly for a smaller team (palace, newcasttle aka neufchateau:) freeing places for class players!!

It makes me wonder though, if the NHL had taken less money and gone over to ESPN after the lockout instead of Versus (now NBC Sports Network), would the league be making more money and would more teams be out of the red?

And while neither make a lot of money (comparatively to professional hockey players, not you and me) if one of them goes, that's a little bit more Cap Room we clear out.

We've got Wilshire and Theo, we don't need Sterling when we are Ox & Gnabry waiting in the wings.m for Sterling level of money we should go balls out after Reus who's much more finished product than Sterling and he's more consistent.